Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error
CDM Appointments
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
fscott  
#1 Posted : 11 May 2015 15:11:25(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
fscott
We are due to have some roof repairs carried out in the next couple of months and I am working to ensure everything is in place in relation to CDM Regs. This is the first time I've been involved in a project like this as a client and I'm wondering if anyone has templates (or suggested wording) that they wouldn't mind sharing for appointing Principal Designer and Principal Contractors as required under Regulation 5? There will only be one contractor who will be undertaking both these roles so no need for any additional appointments.
Back to top
Alfasev  
#2 Posted : 11 May 2015 15:35:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alfasev
You do not really need a template. Most templates just duplicate the regulations and can be full of waffle. I would just keep it brief, using emails and a headed letter, and get them to reply.

If you are entering a formal contract check it has been amended to show dual roles. This will also act as confirmation they have accepted the both roles.
Back to top
ashleywillson  
#3 Posted : 11 May 2015 15:42:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ashleywillson
I agree with Alfasev.

Your contract should state who the duty holders are and it is generally good practice (IMO) to get the PC to name the duty holders in their CPP.

Again I am in agreement with Alfasev, make sure you have a clear contract which clearly states that the one contractor will be PC and PD
Back to top
fscott  
#4 Posted : 11 May 2015 16:14:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
fscott
Thanks guys I wasn't sure how in depth the appointments should be but I will go with keeping it simple.
Back to top
fscott  
#5 Posted : 12 May 2015 11:29:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
fscott
Where the appointments letters are purely for that purpose (i.e. don't contain any other contractual details) would you normally ask the organisation being appointed to sign in acceptance of the appointment?
Back to top
Alfasev  
#6 Posted : 12 May 2015 12:11:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alfasev
It’s good practice to get something back from them. Trust me if it all goes wrong they will try and worm their way out in court.
Back to top
fscott  
#7 Posted : 13 May 2015 09:19:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
fscott
Thanks Alfasev that's what I was thinking
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET