Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Citizen Smith  
#1 Posted : 01 October 2010 17:35:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Citizen Smith

Recently my son had an accident at his nursery school that resulted in a head injury and him being taken to hospital (He's fine now). Point is I considered this to be RIDDOR reportable under R3, persons not at work (see quoted extract below). However the nursery says they have asked the RIDDOR helpline and been told it is not reportable. As the accident occured because he tripped over "stuff" lying on the floor in a walkway I believe it occured arisng out of work i.e the condition of the premises. However, before I go in next week (I'm overseas at the moment so my wife ha had to deal with it all) I'd be interested in any views here as to whether you consider this a RIDDOR or not? Thanks "45 Any injury to a person who is not at work (eg a hotel or care home resident, pupil or student, or a customer in a shop) must be reported if it: (a) results from an accident arising out of or in connection with work; and (b) results in them being taken from the premises where the accident occurred to a hospital, by whatever means (for example by taxi, private car or ambulance)."
Clairel  
#2 Posted : 01 October 2010 18:03:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

I'm a little curious as to what you're trying to achieve with this. I appreciate that you're upset by you little one being taken to hospital but that doesn't mean that someone is responsible or that is it RIDDOR reportable. We have public sites and if we reported everyone taken to hopsital from site it would be a joke. We report where it may be down to site conditions (ie not just they didn;t look where they were going and tripped on the stairs but something was wrong with the stairs or they were wet). Being taken to hospstal in itself does not make it reportable it is whether it was as a result of work related conditions. If your lad tripped over toys that were lying about well I would say that is to be expected in a nursery. If you lad tripped over cables or other work related stuff then I would say that was different. You obviously don't believe what the nursery have told you so in that case call us the HSE yourself and raise your concerns as a complaint, they are duty bound to investigate. Just try and be clear whether this is you thinking as a concerned parent or wheteer you are just looking to lash out becuase you're are worried about your son. Hope he's ok by the way.
Juan Carlos Arias  
#3 Posted : 01 October 2010 20:30:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Juan Carlos Arias

IMO it is a RIDDOR reportable accident, yet again it is for the nursery to worry about. It would not make any difference to you or your little one if they report it or not.
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 02 October 2010 00:14:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

HSE have specific guidance: Education Information Sheet No 1(rev1) (free from HSE website) which suggests incident not-reportable, and this is no doubt what the contact centre are referencing. There is of course still scope for interpretation, dependent on the exact circumstances of the incident - i.e. what the "stuff" was.
Citizen Smith  
#5 Posted : 02 October 2010 11:05:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Citizen Smith

Hmm; an interesting response from Clairel to what I thought was a pretty straightforward request for other professional opinions on a situation I had encountered. I’m actually interested in this from a number of angles. First, as a parent I’m clearly interested to ensure that my son is being looked after safely and effectively. The running of the nursery has recently given myself and others cause for concern on a number of fronts and this incident has identified that safety may be a concern. I plan to discuss the matter with them on my return to the UK next week and want to be sure of my facts before doing so. The document referred to by Ron is one that I have seen and the reason for not being certain is that in the 1998 guide the document is referenced but does not appear to be so in the 2008 guide. I therefore wondered if it had been withdrawn. In “Education Information Sheet No 1(rev1)” it states that the hospital stay should be greater than 24 hours but this is not stated in Regulation 3. Therefore I was seeking clarification from other H&S professionals. Second, I don’t believe my responsibilities end when I stop work. I may not be able to solve all the H&S problems I see but I do believe, as a safety professional, I have a duty to help where it is appropriate and possible and I believe this to be an instance where it is totally appropriate and possible for me to provide some helpful advice and support to the nursery. Third, as a safety professional, this is an opportunity for me to develop my knowledge in an area I would not usually work. From the information I have, it does appear to be that the room they were using as a walkthrough was exceptionally untidy and even give the fact that this is a children’s nursery, this is not an excuse to never tidy up anything. Therefore the statement in the regs regarding “(a) results from an accident arising out of or in connection with work;” I believe is appropriate and probably applies in this instance. There is clearly a balance to be gained between children being allowed the freedom to express themselves and enjoy being children and the need to look after them. I encourage my son to be active and adventurous and he needs to learn to understand risk and the consequences of getting it wrong. Hopefully, he will achieve this without suffering any serious injury. As you suggest, I could report direct to the HSE but I would prefer to work with the Nursery to improve the situation not just for my son, but for all the other children that attend. If this can be achieved this would be a better result for all concerned. I am very clear about what my role in this event is and what I believe is appropriate action.
johnld  
#6 Posted : 02 October 2010 16:27:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
johnld

Given the circumstance you describe had the incident occurred in the nursery I was associated with it would have been reported as a RIDDOR. The staff in the nursery had very clear instructions that walkways and corridors were to be kept clear of all obstructions. Had a similar incident occurred in a play room then it would not have been reported.
Clairel  
#7 Posted : 02 October 2010 18:52:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

My reposnse was base don the fact that: a) As an involved parent it would be impossible for anyone to emotionally remove themselves from the situation and so I wanttd you to consider that as a factor in your thinking b) Your post did not mention wanting to rectify problems at the nursery it purely was asking whether we felt it should have been reported. We all give different answers becuase you haven't given us enough information about the 'stuff' or the circumstances. Like I said the nursery have phoned the HSE and they have said it's not reportable and so of course I am going to query where you are heading with this. Sorry if my post offended you, that was not my intention, but I still can;t see where you are heading with this. If, as you now say, it is about working with the nursery to improve conditons then wheteher the accident to your son was reportable or not in some ways is irrelevant.
m  
#8 Posted : 04 October 2010 13:04:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

In my opinion the answer lies in the interpretation of the Education Information Sheet No 1(rev1), see link below to assist other posters. Only witnesses to the event are going to be able to help on this issue Education Information Sheet No 1(rev1): http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/edis1.pdf The relevant text in the document is copied below: How do I decide whether an accident ‘arises out of or is in connection with work’? An accident will be reportable if it is attributable to: ● work organisation (eg the supervision of a field trip); ● plant or substances (eg lifts, machinery, experiments etc); ● the condition of the premises. What about sports activities? Accidents and incidents that happen in relation to curriculum sports activities and result in pupils being killed or taken to hospital for treatment are reportable. Playground accidents Playground accidents due to collisions, slips, trips and falls are not normally reportable unless they happen out of work or in connection with work, eg because of: ● the condition of the premises or equipment; ● inadequate supervision.
Jim Tassell  
#9 Posted : 04 October 2010 15:25:14(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jim Tassell

There are various grey areas at the edge of RIDDOR, as anyone involved in public-facing organisations will confirm. The HSE are trying to stop it spreading too far away from the original intention of alerting Inspectors to cases that they (or EHOs) need to follow up. In this case, I'd be tempted to enquire what information they have collected in line with their Ofsted registration. That'll put the cat amongst the pigeons.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.