Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 13 August 2004 13:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By dave@swindon Age Diversity: I have been involved with Health & Safety for over 15 years, for the last 7½ I have been a part time Health and Safety Officer in my present job, earlier this year I requested that it be made full time, I had no joy so I decided to look for a full time Health and Safety Job. I qualified Nebosh in 2000 @ the age of 54. I have been lucky enough to have been invited for interviews for all 4 of the jobs I applied for. They were all High profile Jobs; - Regional H&S Adviser for the Police, Fire Brigade, Major Charity, and an International Retail Company who told me I was one of 7 selected from 100 applicants. Unfortunately each one came back “Sorry……….” No. 5 went off Wednesday, after sending it decided to look on their web site and low and behold in their Q&A section I found that they do not accept applications from anyone over 60 as their retirement age is at present 60years. However it is under review in view of the impending legislation on age diversity (I think that’s age discrimination) due to come out in October 2006. If I am successful in number 5 and decide to take it I would have to retire 7 months before the legislation. I am all for youngsters joining the next generation of H&S professionals, but is their life still in the oldies? Or are we past it @ 50. Regards Dave
Admin  
#2 Posted : 13 August 2004 13:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James365 I suspect age discrimination is something that prevails in many organisations, where the perception may be for someone "young and thrusting" as opposed to someone seeing out the remainder of their working life. Which is a mistake in my opinion. With your maturity and experience, you may find youself more appreciated by smaller consultants, perhaps as an associate. Have you considered this approach?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 13 August 2004 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By dave@swindon James, Thanks for the reply, it is worth thinking about as I am a qualified teacher. I am wary about going self employed just in case it goes " pear-shaped ", what job is'nt safe now days? Dave
Admin  
#4 Posted : 13 August 2004 14:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Dave Perhaps a more fruitful line of approach is to dwell on what your years of experience enables you to bring that can't be easily learned otherwise. In this month's issue of SHP, I've outlined an approach to coaching. To what extent does your experience enable you to offer a coaching service? Not simply about S & H technicalities but also about other areas of organisational and management behaviour?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 13 August 2004 17:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Pigg Age discrimination is a massive, very complicated issue. I always believed that there was a problem but also felt that Age was often used as an excuse for not getting the job - younger candidates would accept that someone else could possibly have more relevant skills for a position, whilst the over 50's would think they did not get the job because of age. The was until I studied the history of our candidates at an agency I used to work for. The same percentage of candidates we spoke to were getting interviews regardless of the age, but of those who did get an interview the under 45's were 6 times more likely to get an offer. There are obviously a number of reasons for this - Seniority obviously being one, the Recruitment process is much slower and more convoluted at the more senior levels (that the over 45's are more likely to be at). However I far more frequently get really negative feedback about my more ‘mature’ candidates. Common complaints are unprofessional dress, poor interview technique, arrogance and inability to answer the question given. An interview is a 2 way process, to ascertain whether there is a match between the candidates skills, experience and personality and the requirements of the company. If you bear this mind throughout the duration of the interview you stand a far better chance of getting a job. Regards, Richard Pigg Options Health & Safety Ps. 0 offers from 5 interviews is not a bad result, in Recruitment we expect an offer for every 5 – 7 interviews we arrange.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 13 August 2004 18:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Thomas Dave "Everyone" is telling us that there is no such thing as age discrimination, but we all know in our hearts there is. We apply for jobs where the specn is written around our own cv's - and we don't get called for interview. Then a few months later we have dealings with that organisation to find the job went to someone much much younger than ourselves, but they only stay for 18-24 months and the job is being re-advertised. In my experience the older employee offers experience (of life, not just a jumble of letters after their name), of people and most importantly a work ethic that includes commitment to stay the course. For all of us keep trying, I'm sure there is someone out there who will appreciate your experience of life as well as H&S. best regards Dave
Admin  
#7 Posted : 15 August 2004 17:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Miller I agree that ageism is alive and thriving in the UK. There I said it! To add more fuel to the fire, younger people are more likely to get the jobs because they can be employed more cheaply. Someone 50 or over with a jumble of letters after their name with over 30 years experience will come at a price tag. Also experience and confidence will probably be mistaken for arrogance by the less experienced who are interviewing them. There are those who can feel intimidated by someone’s past experience especially if they themselves are under performers. Don't forget they ( us old f…s that is) still need to earn a living given that they have probably put one or two kids through school/university and still have a remainder of a mortgage to pay off. They will still have a need to earn living to take them through to retirement and a pension, Something the government of today is trying to eliminate’ A Pension' that is. As for the younger generation Just look around you, Retail, Catering, Fast food outlets Flight attendants etc, etc, the majority are all under 25. Why? Cheap labour! Not so very long ago many job adverts in the newspapers often said quote' ideally you will be under?? Years old blah, blah, blah, I myself experienced such discrimination when I was turned down for a post at 38 because they thought that I was too old. When questioned they openly said that in there opinion people over 35 are likely to suffer more ailments and lost time. I wondered then what the world of work was heading for. these adverts don't appear now do they? why? Because of past equal opportunities legislation and corporate image. Ageism still happens though; they just interview you anyway then say no. If anyone thinks that age is not a barrier! Just wait until you’re over 40 thats all I can say. Even with new legislation it will still prevail. As you all know if you wish to avoid legislation in this country all you have to do is take your business abroad and pay 12 year olds 3 shillings a week. No one will ask any questions. No health and safety laws to worry about either. Good luck to all who are 40 something and trying to secure employment whilst proving that age is experience and experience cannot be substituted. Mike
Admin  
#8 Posted : 16 August 2004 16:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly To the previous respondent - we all need need to earn a living regardless of what age we are. You may be needing to put your child through university; I need to get half a foot onto the property ladder. On this particular issue I have sympathies on both sides of the fence. I am young enough to have parents still working but who have both recently been back in the job market with varying levels of response. I am also old enough to have a few jobs by now and worked with various types and levels of people. 'Older colleagues' have occasionally in the past tended to have low levels of IT literacy, reluctance to adapt to a new situation, poor general fitness and a habit of over using the line: "30 (+/-) experience in this job have taught me a/b/c," often accompanied by the world weary "you're young but you'll learn" statement. On the positive side I have learnt many tricks of the trade from these colleagues and once we got to know each other I politely point out that not knowing how to use email in todays' workplace is unacceptable. On a final note my parents have both now found work due in part, I think, to excellent IT skills, the ability to adapt and excellent fitness levels. My Dad thrashed me in the squash court the other day. Jennifer
Admin  
#9 Posted : 16 August 2004 18:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By dave@swindon jennifer, I agree with you, that there is an argument on both sides, it is niether black or white but grey, just like our hair! By the way, my other part time job is IT.. since '83 when they first built the da** things. take care Dave
Admin  
#10 Posted : 17 August 2004 14:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Take heart fellow wrinklies. With the current improvements in Maternity (and now paternity) rights, the tide is turning. Some minor politician said the other week what many think - any small business man will not consider employing women of child bearing age (nor their spouses). Very politically uncorrect, but you can see the point. Those of us who have " been there, done that, nearly got rid of the little darlings" are a far better bet.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 17 August 2004 17:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly "Any woman of child bearing age..." "You can see their point." Oh please, get back to your cave and stay there. And you wonder why you're not getting the jobs!
Admin  
#12 Posted : 18 August 2004 09:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James Goodstadt Jennifer, First of all, as my wife is both of child bearing age and in the process of bearing child, I do not agree that women should not be considered due to being of child bearing age, but are you really saying you cannot see the logic behind the small businesses thinking? Employing someone who may need to be paid for maternity leave, time off for dealing with their children, offering flexible hours (which possibly cost more) etc will cost them money and hence if there is someone who is not child bearing age who is equally qualified and experienced etc, there will surely be the temptation to employ the one perceived to cost less in the long run (even if a bit wrinkly!) Regards James
Admin  
#13 Posted : 18 August 2004 10:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Jennifer, I knew there would be a knee jerk howl from somewhere. I have to admit I was just having a bit of fun. I'm not saying I agree, mearly that I'm open minded enough to see other points of view. Also the world is a nasty place. Please note, I did not make a distinction between male & female with paternity rights blokes are in there as well. Sorry I highjacked the thread.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 18 August 2004 10:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karen Todd Hi Dave, I have a problem with ageism also. I am 28 and think I look 28, but others think I look much younger. In my present job, when I had just started, people said, "So, is this your first job after uni?" and were a bit shocked when I said, "No, I left 5 years ago". I've also been called "kiddo". I have moved around quite a lot in my career, but I think this is a good thing as it has let me see lots of different industries. However, a problem I frequently come across is people who've only ever worked for the one company all their life, or who have been with the company for 25 years and always think they know better than you. Often they have experienced the same problems as you are encountering and can quickly help you identify solutions; but at other times they are just so rigid and set in their ways and don't want to change things or listen to new ideas. These are the kind of people who say, "That wouldn't work because..." or "No, we couldn't possibly do that because..." or even just "No". For example, in a previous job I had only started I was shadowing a senior process engineer and he took me along to one of his meetings. They had a problem with a component that was needed at the start of the process, and without it they couldn't make any product. It had arrived in the UK but was stuck in Customs and they reckoned it might be another week before they could get it. I said, "Why don't you just pay the money for special customs clearance?". After a few people fell off their seat the shocked response was, "You can do that?". They then went and investigated this, but I didn't get to go to any more of those meetings, and I'm sure someone else took the credit for my suggestion. I frequently feel as if people think I need dumbed down, or if I have an idea that they do like the sound of the response is, "Great idea. You go and do that". Another thing I hate is getting rubbish feedback from interviews. I had feedback recently where I apparently came across as "quiet" and they "weren't sure how I'd cope with being in male dominated environments or dealing with difficult situations". As an engineer I've spent my entire working life in male dominated environments, and at one time was a project manager for a structural steel company with 25 men under my direct control! I'm also anything but quiet. The real reason I think I didn't get the job - I looked too young. In fact, at one time I was told to take my age/date of birth off my CV... Karen
Admin  
#15 Posted : 18 August 2004 11:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Hi Karen, To continue my highjack........ I think these attitudes are slowly dissappearing. Certainly where I am, we encourage fresh thinking (I've only been in my current job 14 months). I would agree some folks are stuck in ruts due to lack of exposure to different employers. Also women are an asset to H&S - I've just identified a female operative and encouraged her to move into my dept. A first in the highly macho world my company operate in. Like you I've been in engineering for some considerable time. I don't want to be patronising, but some of the best engineers I've met have been female. With my sexist pig hat on - I've never heard a woman complain she looks too young before - you complain too much methinks!
Admin  
#16 Posted : 18 August 2004 14:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jennifer Kelly Knee jerk reaction moi?! No seriously I understand what you were saying Jim and whats more, agree with what you are saying. To describe the world as a 'nasty' place is a little over the top in this context, what you mean is that many companies always look at the bottom dollar rather than do the right thing in terms of their legal and moral duty. Sound familiar? In terms of women being better or more professional then men, whilst it is very nice of you to say that, you miss the point. The ability to do a job is not dependent on your gender, colour, orientation or age. It is down to the right qualifications and experience. A proper interview must use these principles when deciding upon the best candidate. That way we are ALL protected regardless of our gender, colour, orientation or age. Regards Jennifer
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.