Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 04 September 2008 11:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Decimomal
Me again - with my metaphorical hard hat and flack jacket on ready for the volley!!

Anyway here goes.........

Internal fire doors are routinely wedged open from the beginning of the working day until the cleaning staff go early evening. These doors are clearly marked 'Fire Door keep Closed'.

I guess most of us have been in this situation and our initial reaction is to remove the wedges and make a fuss etc. I appreciate there may be a dispensation to allow ths practice for a short time to enable deliveries to take place but I am looking for a definitive pointer to the potential breach of the RRO or other statute. I have had a look under section 14 of the RRO but cannot specifically find any reference that states such things as fire doors must not be wedged or held open.

Workplace is a standard office environment over 3 floors.

The query has come up in the past but I don't know whether there was a definite answer.

I look forward to all practical and pragmatic responses (is that the right terminology?)

Regards,

Decimo.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 September 2008 11:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
Hi Decimo,
You could also brouse sect 4. general fire precuations. (a) reduce the risk of fire and reduce the risk of spread of the fire
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 September 2008 11:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
I think that it is a straight breach of HASAWA Sec 8 "No person shall recklessly or intentionally interfere with anything provided in the interests of health, safety and welfare".

Therefore, a criminal act for which the individual, (or the person permitting it?) can be prosecuted.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 04 September 2008 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jan Rowney
http://www.dorgard.com/

Have you thought of installing something like the Dorgard on the internal fire doors that works in conjunction with the fire alarm?

Admin  
#5 Posted : 04 September 2008 12:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DP
Decimomal - Don’t know of any - however, there have been prosecutions under the RRO were propping open fire doors formed part of the charges and I know of one case where it cost 25k.

If they need to be open for periods of time link them into the alarm system and put on automatic closers.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 04 September 2008 12:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
I go with the "reckless interference" approach.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 04 September 2008 12:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Decimomal
Thank you for the responses, I guess it is a quiet day for all the comedians out there!

It looks like Section 8 is the answer. Door stops etc are not really an option as there is no need for the doors to be left open in the first place.

Decimo.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 04 September 2008 13:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jervis
Have you not herd of the British Standard Door Wedge we have lots in the NHS [WELL THATS WHAT OUR ESTATES TEND TO CALL THEM]
On a more serious noter dorgards or magnetic catches attached to the wall conacted to fire alarm.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 04 September 2008 13:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
The best fire door wedges are metal red things about 2 feet tall, 8 inches in diameter and have a trigger and hose.........
Admin  
#10 Posted : 04 September 2008 14:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
ohhhh so that's what they are for!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 04 September 2008 14:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer
You say the doors are being wedged open but give no reason for this. Is there a reason why such action is undertaken like moving heavy equipment in and out? If there is try fitting automatic door controls, if not try taking someone to task with the sack, that should do the trick.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 04 September 2008 14:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Decimomal
Bob,

There is no reason as far as I can see, it has just become custom and practice. I am not the HS role in the scenario so cannot do anything about it. My advice was to just keep removing the wedges and somebody would soon get fed up!

I believe the health and safety rep records it on a monthy report but nothing happens hence the initial query about the legal aspect.

Decimo
Admin  
#13 Posted : 04 September 2008 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
Habitual practices can be problematic in many cases.

Maybe show the film as to how fast and how easy for fire/smoke is able to spread without being checked as a wake up call ?

Admin  
#14 Posted : 04 September 2008 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anthony Edwards
Decimo,

Get the safety rep to take them away on amonthly basis instead of recording them.

Nutty
Admin  
#15 Posted : 04 September 2008 16:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi
Have you investigated the reasons why the doors are wedged open? Are these automatic doors? Is it done to permit movement of materials, trolleys etc on a very frequent basis. Or is it sheer laziness?
Admin  
#16 Posted : 04 September 2008 16:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lulu
I encounter this problem a lot too. It is normally connected with trying to increase airflow in warm and stuffy offices.

I agree that should find out the reason behind it as if you can fix the root cause its better all round.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 04 September 2008 17:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ClaireL
Internal fire doors do not fall under H&S legislation so I am not sure if technically HSWA can be applied.Just a thought.

How about fitting devices that allow the doors to remain open unless the fire alarm goes off and then they automatically close (can't remember what they are called!)
Admin  
#18 Posted : 04 September 2008 21:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Messy Shaw
As a fire service inspecting officer, I often have to issue notices under the RR(FS)O2005 on this matter.

Article 14(2)b is used, as it states:

"in the event of danger, it must be possible for persons to evacuate the premises as quickly and as safely as possible;"


The argument is that open fire doors spread fire & smoke more rapidly and prevent persons escaping as quickly and safely as possible

The FS guides issued by the dept of communities give info about managing fire doors
Admin  
#19 Posted : 04 September 2008 21:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Messy Shaw
As a fire service inspecting officer, I often have to issue notices under the RR(FS)O2005 on this matter.

Article 14(2)b is used, as it states:

"in the event of danger, it must be possible for persons to evacuate the premises as quickly and as safely as possible;"


The argument is that open fire doors spread fire & smoke more rapidly and prevent persons escaping as quickly and safely as possible

The FS guides issued by the dept of communities give info about managing fire doors
Admin  
#20 Posted : 04 September 2008 22:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Clark
I think you will find that dorgard is fitted to the IOSH premises at The Grange.

Whilst this system was [i assume] deployed following a thorough risk assessment, i was taught that any wedging of doors (apart from electromagnetic restraint of the top of a door e.g. as per many NHS and hotel premises) was a bad idea as there was the potential for the door to warp (wooden door, air moisture, door closer pulling the top, wedge applying oposite force etc) and therefore no longer properly fitting the door frame. As we all know, the door AND frame and the fit between the two are critical to the performance in a fire.

We have fitted [to some premises] electric door closers that energise when the fire alarm is activated. They work very well and i always recommend them on new builds - retro fit is a bit costly but not impossible.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 05 September 2008 11:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian J B
We use DorGuards on some doors although these are retro-fit as on the rest of the site we have magnetic holders on fire doors.

I went through a stage of having our maintenance team cut all door wedges into quarters whenever they found any, the supply soon dried up and people began asking for retro fit door holders. I've got round the issue of distortion of the doors by making sure they are regularly checked and only held on the doorguards when it's necessary to do so (movement of goods etc)
Admin  
#22 Posted : 05 September 2008 12:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton
Deci:

you wrote: "My advice was to just keep removing the wedges and somebody would soon get fed up!"

My experience (1980/81 - a long time ago!) was, after spending about six months patiently removing the wooden wedges which I found on a daily basis - I discovered that one of the site chippies spent about two hours a week making the damn things! His output was higher than my input (I ended up with two filing cabinets full), so I don't know whether people were taking them home or what... I stopped him, and the problem went away.

Good luck

Steve
Admin  
#23 Posted : 05 September 2008 14:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Hugo
Sorry i cannot remember the quotation from the old Fire Safety red book bible but it was something like this -

A fire door is a door; when closed, together with its frame and furniture meet the necessary stability, integrity and insulation qualities to prevent the passage of fire, smoke and the unburned products of combustion to a minimum specified duration.

I used to issue improvement notices for this and make a record (note for file) in the fire certificate folder, these were signed by the building owner / manager and held in case the building caught fire and then used in evidence if an open door spread or accelerated fire.

I also requested they remove the wedge and close the door in my presence.

These people are removing the protection of a means of escape (corridor or staircase) there will probably be self closing devices on the door and also vision panels. The other doors along the corridor will probably not have this protection and wedgeing them open removes the compartmentation of the corridor and creates a dead end and denies a means of escape...

I would not be amused with this practice as I have seen the difference between an area protected by a 30 min egg box typr door and open doors during a fire.
Is life really that difficult?????????? Request advice from your local Fire & Rescue Service "Fire Safety Department"
Admin  
#24 Posted : 05 September 2008 14:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Renny Thomson
If I collect the wedges, I use them as kindling!
Admin  
#25 Posted : 05 September 2008 14:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fornhelper
Decimomal

I got round the problem of door wedges being used in one of our establishments by placing an offending door wedge on the 'wrong side' of the manager's door then asking someone to call her to come through to the main office whilst I stood close by and observed.

The door duly jammed when the manager tried to open it and I think I made the point that in the event of a fire, door wedges could result in doors jamming closed and trapping people on the wrong side.

In fairness she took my point on board and has now retro fitted Dorguards and there is not a door wedge to be seen!!! Added bonus was that she mentioned it at the next managers meeting and I must admit hearing a H & S message coming from someone else rather than me did gladden the heart!!!

Regards
FH
Admin  
#26 Posted : 08 September 2008 09:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By water67.
Hi, a difficult one to answer. i recall as a new keen H&S officer going around our HQ office (5 floors) where I am located, and removing wedges and put them in the bin. Next day the doors were wedged open with boxes of copy paper. Thus things were worse not better. We continually hammer home the point that it says fire door keep shut for a reason and also wedging the doors open plays havoc with the hydrolic system in the self closures. But I don't go around removing wedges, and anyway we all know these have the ability to breed over night, At the end of the day local managers should be monitoring H&S including fire afety in their areas. The law says so, our H&S policy says so and common sense says so.. if you ever crack it give me the recipe.

Cheers
Admin  
#27 Posted : 08 September 2008 10:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Decimomal
I think this thread has reached it's conclusion now, thank you all for your input.

My initial query about the legalities has been answered and I guess the final say would be on the back of an enforcement visit.

Ciao 4 now.

Decimo
Admin  
#28 Posted : 08 September 2008 13:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By B Jolly
We recently had an inspection from the Fire Authority, they gave us an improvement notice one of the items clearly stated: Fire Doors must not be held open unless a suitable device is used which will close the door when the alarm is initiated. Are the doors fire doors because they are protecting an escape route, or just ordinary internal doors which should be closed to restrict a fire. I have seen lots of doors which have "Fire Door" signs when the door is quite clearly not a fire door. If they are continually being held open then why not get a "hold open device" which is linked to the alarm and will free thus closing the door on the sound of the alarm.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.