Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 19 November 2008 13:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By May Warley Hi All, Thought I better confirm with you guys on this first. My boss decided to have a heater fixed to the smoke shelter. My question is, if a trespasser was to try stealing this heater and maybe gets electrocuted, are we liable for his injury? Not sure if I have gone too far here. Thanks in advance May
Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 November 2008 13:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Bywater May, Personally I'd be more concerned with the wasted energy. Smoking shelters are designed to give protection from rain and offer only limited side protection. Thus any benefit given by the heater is negligible and thus a complete waste of energy. So put your environmental head on and tell the staff to wear coats if necessary and save the boss some money...he'll love you for it. Mark
Admin  
#3 Posted : 19 November 2008 13:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By May Warley Hi Mark, Too late, as he didn't consult with me at all. I only found this out this morning when I greeted the Engineer and was told he planned to put it up today. Thanks May
Admin  
#4 Posted : 19 November 2008 14:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barrie (Badger) Etter Re orignal posting the answer is yes ref HSWA s3 I think it is - protection of non employees. Its one of those situations the wrong person gets hammered for some thing they haven't done. Badger
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 November 2008 15:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fornhelper Sounds to me as if the shelter is 'non compliant'- putting a heater in (or should I say 'alongside') any of the smoking shelters I've seen would - as Baldric would say - be as daft as the daftest man doing the daftest thing at a party for daft people!! :-) Seriously though I would agree with Badger re liability FH
Admin  
#6 Posted : 19 November 2008 16:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Barrie I would disagree if a trespasser rips an electrical appliance of a wall and get electrocuted - unlucky - what do you expect. If you leave live electrical cables hanging out and he gets a jolt - that's a different matter
Admin  
#7 Posted : 19 November 2008 16:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By water67. Hi agree with dave Wilson.. if you follow the strict liability line sugested here..there would be no public accessable electrical, powered utilities, appliances, services etc. Cheers
Admin  
#8 Posted : 19 November 2008 16:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fornhelper Dave I see where your coming from but we've had action taken against us because a 12 year old climbed on to a roof and fell after pulling an adjacent wheelie bin over to assist him getting on to the roof!! I don't agree that the 'person' who put up the heater should be liable but I could envisage a similar scenario in this case. Remember the good old days when it was OK to have broken bottles cemented on to the top of a wall - I've still got a scar but never got any compensation - time barred by now I suppose :-) FH
Admin  
#9 Posted : 19 November 2008 16:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi Points to consider:- 1) Location of the shelter--is it accessible to members of public easily. Not clear from your thread. 2) Is this heater designed for "external" use that can potentially be exposed to the elements-if so, you are OK 3) Are the electrics installed suitable for external use -if so you are OK If you are OK for points 2 & 3 (which in any case you need to consider, irrespective of trespassers), you have taken due diligence. You could have some form of additional protection, such as a "cage", if there was reasonable foreseeability of members of public having legal access.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 19 November 2008 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson People Occupiers Liability / Defective premises etc. You cannot do anything or make your building unsafe so that it could affect the H&S of people who are likely to come on to your premises, including the young & trespassers etc. However you have to do everything which is reasonable in all the circumstances etc. Leaving things around which scallywags can get on so they can access your roof is different from wanton theft and vadalism and the person then gets injured in carrying out the criminal act - cut the artery in my neck when I broke your window to burgle your property is different from leaving barbed wire behind the window to injure any burglar and he suffers a bleeding femoral artery. H&S at work has got nothing to do with it.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 19 November 2008 17:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jervis Yep think you would same if a trespasser falls through a damaged roof you are held responsible good old British Law.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 19 November 2008 20:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MP Grayson Having a heater in the tabber's shelter? What next? In order for this to work I suspect that it will be on all of the time. So don't worry about a tea-leaf stealing it. It will be too hot and they will drop it when they burn themselves ;-) Crackin
Admin  
#13 Posted : 20 November 2008 10:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer It sounds as if you are left with a poor decision, but, there are things you can do both to protect people from harm when using the shelter properly and when doing daft things. Cage the heater in and ensure the power supply is protected. And then hope nothing goes wrong but protect yourself.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 20 November 2008 10:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By NJS a limited knowledge of the area in concern here but......... I thought a smoking shelter was not to be fully enclosed on 3 or more of the faces? i essence it is supposed to no more thasn a roof to shelter from the elements. Putting a heater in an open space is fairly unnecessary surely. as others have pointed out think environmentaly, what a waste of energy trying to heat up Outside, surely a contributory factor to global warming? Also as it is open and exposed to the elements, there seems little the organisastion can do to make it secure, therefore the risk of some little bleeder trying to half inch it is hugely increased as is the risk if electrocution. I would speak to your boss and remind him of his statutory duties to employees and others! if you remind him of "HIS" duties and the fact he cannot delegate responsibility he may reconsider. it would be interesting to hear what the outcome is. NJS
Admin  
#15 Posted : 20 November 2008 10:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kirsty Davies2 I am impressed by the management's commitment towards their employees. However, it is totally unnecessary step. It's like giving them comfort to stay there for longer, encouraging them to harm themselves even more with the cigs. Also there's no point of providing heater in an open shelter. Coming to the question - Employer WILL be responsible for any injury caused to the 'thief'. because TRESPASERS are given rights too. There was an example recently, where a thief sued the owner of house for not providing a safe access whilst he got trapped in a garage.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 20 November 2008 11:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By May Warley Hi All, Our smoke shelter is located just outside the locker room, so the engineer cut off the corner of the window to get the cables through to the power supply. I have also found out the two heaters are for outdoor use and I have been requested to come up with a sign 'last one out, turn heaters off' just now. I spoke to the mgr of my concern on the waste of energy and what I got from him is there are a lot of smoke shelters out there using the heaters, so what else can I say... sigh...
Admin  
#17 Posted : 20 November 2008 11:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sen Sar Surely this happens all the time.... Many Pubs now have smoking shelters with heaters..well they do where I live!
Admin  
#18 Posted : 20 November 2008 11:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sen Sar Maybe a chat to a brewery/pub might help as it must be something they have overcome.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 20 November 2008 12:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barrie (Badger) Etter May As a matter of curiosity does the manger concerned smoke? As for the energy wastage get your sparky to wire in a timer and set it to come on 30 mins after work starts and ditto before work ends. Badger
Admin  
#20 Posted : 20 November 2008 13:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike DF Or get the sparky to set the timer 20 minutes before the breaktimes... It sounds like you have pampered smokers. I did not know that there was an obligation to provide shelters, never mind heating them. Look out in the spring when the air conditioner arrives.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 20 November 2008 14:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By May Warley Nope, unsurprisingly he's a nonsmoker. And yup, I agree with everybody else, the smokers at our place are too pampered.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 20 November 2008 16:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Kirsty. I agree with your comments, however if a trespasser vandalises electrical equipment on your premises I cannot see how you could be held liable if they get a belt from it. If this was the case then every single person in the Uk would have to lock up / remove / switch off ALL the equipment before they shut the offices to go home every day.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 20 November 2008 16:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kirsty Davies2 Dave, I understand your point. But Sadly this is the law. There're a list of case laws.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 20 November 2008 16:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kirsty Davies2 Just to make things a bit more Clearer. Please note that Occupier's Liability Act 1984 states that; "An occupier of premises owes a duty to another in respect of any such risk if he is aware of the danger or has reasonable grounds to believe that it exists; Now as mentioned earlier, the owner do know that there is a possiblity of theft attempt, hence risk of injury, therefore, responsible for not take appropriate steps in the case of injury.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.