Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 January 2009 21:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GaryC40 Whats the big fascination with Nebosh? I did NGC last year and found it nothing more than a memory exercise! The Dip seems to follow the same route. ok i admit that it holds some standing in HS land but surely Nebosh is not the way forward. The vocabulary used is alien to normal working practice and to be honest, i suggest its just a conditioning exercise. I have went down the postgrad route following some 20 years on a learning curve in the real world. The course 'Safety and Risk Management' at Strathclyde is extremely challenging, however it really expands ones thought process and encourages you to come up with real solutions for every day problems. I have attended many courses and achieved modest success, however through this type of course work it is only now i feel real confidence. It worries me that there is to many people with 'photographic' memories out there thinking that they are experts. When in fact all they can really do is recite regulations and Acts. The Nebosh formula is extremely flawed. We should be encouraging training programmes that challenge our problem solving abilities not reading past papers, copying, plagiarism and speaking in fork tongues! just an opinion based on my experience. GC
Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 January 2009 21:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Fraser Gary C40 I disagree with everything you say. If NEBOSH is so bad, then can you tell me why hundreds of safety people all over the UK are doing NEBOSH Courses from Cert to diploma. The reason why I have went down the NEBOSH route is purely driven by Job descriptions on what potential employers expect from candidates.It is the gold standard of H & S Quals - everyone in the safety world is aware of its standing and hence willing to spend time gaining the qualification. Thus anyone with the NEBOSH Dip backed up with experience is in the driving seat as far I am concerned, due to fierce competition from other candidates with similar quals. I thought about doing the Postgraduate Cert at Strathclyde Uni - but decided against it. I think a wise choice . John
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 January 2009 23:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GaryC40 I respect your decision Jim, however believe your view to be misguided. Your are correct in stating that Nebosh is considered the 'gold qual' but thats only because the tern 'Nebosh' is to HS as 'Hoover' is too vacuum cleaners. Both the PGC and Nebosh Dip qualifies for GradIosh, so in actual fact there is no real difference in acedemic standing. I have went down the Nebosh road, successfully i may add (NGC & construction) and found them to be of 'restrictive help' when it actually came down to the nitty gritty of practising HS. Yes, by all means Nebosh might get you through a job interview, however it does not prepare you how to think and problem solve. Competence is defined as a blend of ability, experience, formal qualification etc, the PGC (and similar) offers all three, therefore i conclude that it should be considered the 'platinum' HS Qual. I am passionate about improving HS, and vehemently feel that prescriptive learning is not the way forward. NGC, yes to get your foot in, but give the Dip the boot once your there! Gary
Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 January 2009 08:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Fraser As I said before, if NEBOSH is so bad then why so many people / safety professionals are doing it in the uk and beyond ?. John
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 January 2009 08:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony abc jprhdnMurphy "I have went down the postgrad route" NEBOSH may have been easy, English may be more beneficial.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 22 January 2009 08:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David McGuire Hi all, I am currently going through the post graduate certificate in risk and safety management at strathclyde university. So thought I would join in this discussion. I have done the NEBOSH route as well, i.e. general cert, construction cert, and envrionmental dip. I found NEBOSH to prescritive in way they want you to answer questions. Yes it is a very good qualification, but it is not the be all and end all, the PG cert, NVQ 4 etc are just as good and have the same standing in IOSH i.e. grad IOSH.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 January 2009 10:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Cartwright Gary C40 You have a very strong opinion on NEBOSH even though you only did the NGC and the Construction Certificate. I did the old NEBOSH Dip 1 & 2, and I can assure you we were also taught how to do problem solving. When doing the 10 assignments we were given a problem to solve. We then had to go away and put into words how we would go about solving these problems. As for it being a memory exercise, is it not true that life is a memory exercise. Steve
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 January 2009 10:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David McGuire John, I disagree with your comment on "a person having a NEBOSH dip and experiance will be in the drivng seat with respects to gaining a job". Although I do agree that the NEBOSH dip is a good qualification to have as a safety professional, I think having a MSC in risk and safety management would be a better advantage/ qualification than the diploma! The MSC in risk and safety management is a higher qual than the dip in both IOSH terms and the national qualifications structure.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 22 January 2009 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kirsty Davies2 I quite agree with GC. (Myth & stereotype) NEBOSH is widely taken as the only suitable route towards appropriate H&S Qualifications. There are other courses available which are equally good if not better than NEBOSH courses. Unfortunately, the problem arises when employers mention words like NEBOSH qualifications and/or IOSH membership in their advertisements as the main requirements for the job. This is noting more than a lack of their knowledge and ignorance in this field. A person can be a competent H&S professional without both. Kirsty
Admin  
#10 Posted : 22 January 2009 10:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By justgossip In my experience, i worked as H&S for a firm for about 5 years and all was well ( external audit indicated ). Then i was made redundant. I could not get a job without getting a NEBOSH cert so off I went and acquired my cert. the course was not a waste of time. The one thing it did not do was develope my ability to convert legislation into action within the workplace. I now meet up with H&S people in the construction sector who have NEBOSH and more. I judge such people by the actions of their employees. I would conclude that NEBOSH is requirement to do the job. On the sites i visit, the qualified people seem to have serious problem in converting the knowledge into a positive action by all employees of a company structure. Some companies are using a lot of resources for not a lot of results. I will not be going further down the academic line as this would be boring. If they bring out a qualification that was evidence of competence then I would go for it. So I would conclude NEBOSH is a good academic qualification that should be held by all safety practitioners but we need something that addresses real life. however I could be wrong as i have only met up with about 20 H&S bods garry
Admin  
#11 Posted : 22 January 2009 10:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adam Worth Kirsty - I agree! I saw a police position requesting "IOSHH Certificate" I would also add to Gary "many people with 'photographic' memories out there thinking that they are experts." Is this not the case for lots of degrees and courses?
Admin  
#12 Posted : 22 January 2009 11:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anne Mageean The first question on the A paper on Tuesday referred to "developing and evolving yourself as a health and safety practionner" I certainly could not rote learn an answer to that one!! Anne
Admin  
#13 Posted : 22 January 2009 11:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AMelrose I think a lot of the problem is that most courses don't offer a "practical" session whereby the student can apply what they have learned in a "real" situation [and judging from the number of pleas for help gaining "experience" this seems to be across the board..]. An MSc can provide some experience if you are lucky enough to get a placement with a company that wants to help your development (rather than getting a free datacruncher / general office help etc). I personally believe a stint "shadowing" a few individuals would be more useful [with a log book approach showing what you've done in that time]. Given once you attain the magical status of CMIOSH you have to do CPD and complete a logbook of activities, this would get students into the way of completing them...I know this would be difficult to implement initially but would effectively be an "apprenticeship" in H&S. BTW, I completed both the Nebosh Certificate (didn't help with my career one bit) and PG Cert from Strathclyde (helped me get CMIOSH status which ultimately got me the job I'm in)....
Admin  
#14 Posted : 22 January 2009 12:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Fraser David Mc Guire In my experience, anyone who has a MSC in H & S but no practical experience to back it up is struggling to find H & S work. In my last place, several people went for a h & s advisor advisor position , but they all got knocked back because they were over qualified academically, but no practical experience / CMIOSH status to back it up. Ir also didn't help that the two people interviewing them ( h & s manager & h & s director )had only a level four qualification ( NEBOSH Dip ). The quote at the time was that they are over qualified with no experience to back it up. As I have stated previously, match the experience to the qualification = better chance of being successful at interview stage. John
Admin  
#15 Posted : 22 January 2009 12:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David McGuire John, I was not really talking about "experiance" I assumed that anyone with a NEBOSH dip or MSC in risk and safety management would be experianced in their field! I was just trying to show that the NEBOSH diploma is not the 'be all and end all' of qualifications. Ok, if you were a hiring manager and you had two potential employees to interview for a role. Both potential employees have a equal amount of experiance(several years), one holds a NEBOSH diploma and the other holds a MSC in Risk and Safety Management, who would you hire? and who do you think is in the "driving seat" regarding getting the role? Answers on a post card please, and do try to answer honestly!
Admin  
#16 Posted : 22 January 2009 12:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JasonGould Doing the cert and then claiming the whole NEBOSH thing is just a silly photographic memory route is just ridiculous IMHO and smells of sour grapes. If I recall correctly based on rough memory from start to finish, = total of 6 exams ranging from 2 to 3.5 hrs each. Well over a 800 hrs study time discounting home study and background reading which raises to 1000's hrs. 35,000 (50,000 before you trim them down) word based assignments on scenarios that are not a simple case of black and white. Yeah go on, tell me it was all a waste of time (ROFL) or that I just walk around quoting this and that. Whilst there are plenty of alternative routes out there, NEBOSH route still stands as one of the best routes in my book although I would never rule out other persons with different quals because at the end of the day quals just mean quals and experience means experience. I have met a variety of persons whom hold very little in terms of paper quals but you can bet your life I would rather them looking after a construction site than myself. Equaly so, I have met people with the whole lot and I would never let them get anywhere on a site :) I don't have a photographic memory (whats this subject about again?) I never did any exams at all previous to the NEBOSH ones so strongly refute any claims it is only for academics or the photographic memory type of person. Quite simply this is just not the case at all and some people whom fail, fail because they simply never did the work or understood what was being asked in the first place. I don't quote rules and regs unless it is required (trust me there are times when it is required both on site and in the boardroom)Anyone with any real experience in H&S will know this is true. GC are you from the club of CMIOSH members are geeks and elitist and NEBOSH qualified persons have no perspective of the real world?
Admin  
#17 Posted : 22 January 2009 13:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter Gary, like you I would sing the praises of the Strathclyde pgc course, it suited my learning preferences and as you say is designed to stretch and challenge the way you currently think and go about the job - it is also very hard work! That said, I don't agree this gives any justification for knocking the NEBOSH Dip route. Some people prefer to study that way.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 22 January 2009 13:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi In my view, this is because both the employers and surprisingly, recruitment agencies do not know better. My post is to do with all the qualifications including the NEBOSH Diploma accredited by IOSH to meet the graduate membership grade We have had a lot of anecdotal comments regarding the quality of prospective job candidates with University Graduate/Post Graduate -Certificate/Diploma/Degree routes to qualification. We cannot make reasonable conclusions as they are not based on a proper scientific survey and the sample size of the personal comments is very small When we are discussing the merits of only the qualification, we should leave experience out of it as it is blindingly obvious that anyone qualifying with more experience is most likely to have an advantage! It is rare that you will have a NEBOSH Diploma qualified person without experience as this particular route in context of cost, time etc is not practicable for those without experience. Another factor is that as NEBOSH is one of the oldest "qualifications", this is being mentioned etc, by the employers, the recruitment agencies etc, although many more now include "equivalent". I have contributed to similar threads previously, and let there no doubt that when it comes to the broad equivalency of various routes to "academic" qualifications, the University Graduate/Post Graduate -Certificate/Diploma/Degree are at a higher level than the NEBOSH/BSC Diploma Refer to the most recent guidance from IOSH titled “Setting standards in health and safety - raising performance through training and competence development”. Appendix B on page 13 titled “How the different qualification levels relate to each other” . http://www.iosh.co.uk/fi...ARDS101108%20%282%29.pdf The most important clarification is on Page 4 of the same guidance. This clarifies having an “academic” qualification in health and safety , i.e. from the higher education sector or nationally accredited awarding bodies such as the National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health (NEBOSH) doesn’t make one competent to practise health and safety. It only demonstrates is that the person has carried out a programme of academic work leading to the development of knowledge and some skills, and that they’ve been formally assessed in an examination and/or by some other method. The “knowledge” the person gained can form the basis of competence, as long as that person then acquires suitable experience and skills in the workplace. An NVQ/SVQ in occupational health and safety which demonstrates competence in the knowledge and skills needed in the particular workplace setting the person undertook the NVQ, requires the person to gain more work experience/knowledge in the wider context to become competent.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 22 January 2009 14:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GaryC40 Well Good afternoon everyone! I must say that i am delighted at the response to my suggestions regarding the Nebosh route Vs alternative. To be honest i have no real gripe against NEBOSH, however do feel that the powers that be should refresh the format of the Certificate level. The reason i went down the road of PGC / MSc was in actual fact due to comments by the tutor of the NGC cert course i attended a few years back. The view of the tutor (A Nebosh Dip Question Contributor!) was that the DiP route was not the only route, and that we should research all available course before committing. They are quite expensive after all. The PGC is £2850, which i think is similar to the DiP. To complete the MSc is around £9000. I discussed the NEBOSH dip with quite a few others students/colleagues and was extremely surprised by the negative responses received, whether this was all down to 'sour grapes' or not, i do not know. I do know however the format of both courses are extremely different, and this was what i was trying to get across! Every time i log onto to this forum there is generally people asking about which course to do, the majority of replies (opinion) seem to suggest NEBOSH, well i suggest this. Research Research Research base your decision, not only on what employers may or may not advertise for, but also on your gut instinct and what YOU will get out of the coursework. I am certainly not an elitist, however i may be a geek (I'll ask the girlfriend)The postgrad cert can be an absolute nightmare at times, and i may not complete on schedule due to external work pressures, however i do know this. it has certainly given me back the enthusiasm for HS which was nearly destroyed by the NGC. Whatever you decide, good luck! Gary
Admin  
#20 Posted : 22 January 2009 14:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John A Wright GaryC40 wrote "The vocabulary used is alien to normal working practice and to be honest, i suggest its just a conditioning exercise". and then "I have went down ..." Well if you use THAT sort of vocabulary or grammar I would expect NEBOSH Cert. classes to improve your skills significantly! :o)) Seriously though, I attended a 12 x Friday course at Warwickshire College for my Cert. and with 16 pupils in the class and a very good tutor I learned a lot new H&S subjects, learned a lot about interacting with people of different professions, and learned about problem-solving in various work environements with H&S issues. What you put into it is what you get out of it - I was developing a new career and I put effort into the classes and into passing the exams. I appreciate there was a necessary skill required in interpreting NEBOSH-speak questions but even THAT is still useful now when getting definitions across to customers/operatives who need to grasp some fundamentals in safe systems of work. John W
Admin  
#21 Posted : 22 January 2009 16:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barrie (Badger) Etter GC Totally agree regarding the ailien wording NEBOSH use. Fluffed the main part- on alien wording, of the 3 exams but put in Credit results for the other 2 . From there went onto and have completed a NVQ4 which I romped through thanks to the NEBOSH I feel. So use the NEBOSH for the training and the NVQ for the qualifier. What say you?
Admin  
#22 Posted : 22 January 2009 17:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Suffolkman Folks "stop the world I want to get off", why does it matter to anyone whether NOBOSH is the "gold standard" or not surely what is important is the every H&S professional is competent and effective. There are a variety of routes to IOSH membership grades which in my opinion are all equally valid and a matter of personal choice. Personally I took the old NEBOSH Cert and thought it was great, did the Nebosh part 1 diploma and passed (but thought the project was to restrictive)then completed my NVQ4 and obtained CMIOSH, did IEMA Cert, and recently passed PgC and am going on to PgD/MSc.... a mix that suited me on cost/ availability/ support etc... grounds Lets all show some respect for anyone however they get to professional status please
Admin  
#23 Posted : 22 January 2009 18:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By William I myself am planning the Strathclyde way, I gained an HNC in occupational safety, health and environmental management in Edinburgh years ago and to be honest the snobbery experienced if you do not have the NEBOSH is quite alarming. My qualification was equivalent to part 1 of the nebosh dip at the time and many employers did not recognise it and only wanted nebosh, even though the general cert was below the standard of the HNC, as well as health and safety, i gained a good grounding in environmental management, communications, IT, statistics and math, and the main 4 science which subjects to give me an underpinning knowledge of the science associated with health, safety and environmental management. I still do not work full time in health and safety and work offshore as a rigger, and to be honest most of the people who i have came across with nebosh general certificates both offshore and onshore are not very impressive and it does not take much to baffle them, they maybe good at cramming information before an exam, but not very good at applying it. The nebosh system is like the old exams in at secondary school where your whole future depended on a couple of exams and took no account of course work done throughout the year, the educational system has modernised and moved on so why hasn't nebosh?
Admin  
#24 Posted : 22 January 2009 19:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GaryC40 Just to clarify a few things. I am not a snob, elitist, geek, respectful, right or wrong, but i do have an opinion, which is shared (in some respects) with other forum users. I do not agree with the Nebosh method, but that does not mean i disrespect persons who have achieved NGC and/or DiP status. Its bloody hard work! It is obvious through reading this thread that there is a great deal of passion regarding formal qualification methods used in the pursuit of academic competence. Where there is passion there is also pride, a good sign! It will be interesting to see how Nebosh and alternatives courses evolve over the next 5 years. Only tome will tell. Good luck and good night.
Admin  
#25 Posted : 22 January 2009 19:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GaryC40 Sorry - Disrespectful! speaking of this JasonGould. The reason i started my HS career was because my father died of an occupational disease. I have worked in the motor industry for 9 years (panel beater)Builders merchant supervisor (7 Years) PPE sales manager (5 years)HSEQ/security Manager (3 years) in the Port industry. In 3 years...lead auditor course, IOSH Managing Safely, NGC, Construction Cert, Postgrad S & R and implemnted 9001 and 14001 at work. The only port in Scotland to do so. So when it comes to real life experience, i think i just may qualify! xx
Admin  
#26 Posted : 22 January 2009 19:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Allan Curran I respect your point of view but to say that all you need is a photographic memory and the ability to regurgitate is flawed. There is far too much to memorize and regurgitate-aside from that photographic memories are extremely rare - understanding and achieving a depth of knowledge is not.
Admin  
#27 Posted : 22 January 2009 22:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Emma Forbes Hi Gary, as you know, I too am doing the PgC and after doing the Nebosh diploma, in my opinion, is so much better! I would agree that it allows you to be creative and encourages individual writing and understanding styles, where I found Nebosh to be far too restrictive. Both good courses in their own right, but I far prefer the PgC and would highly recommend it to anyone.
Admin  
#28 Posted : 23 January 2009 08:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pete Longworth William, you are spot on to say that there is more than an element of snobbery here. I remember when I did my diploma. It was the first year of the new diploma and the attitude of those taking dip2 at the same time was very much "That's a Mickey Mouse diploma compared to ours" It reminds me of the old "that was the week that was " sketch. " "I've got the new diploma so I can look down on him because he only has the NVQ4, but I must look up to him because he has Dip2" "I've got dip2 so I can look down on them" "I know my place, I've only got NVQ4 and must look up to them, funny thing is we are all CMIOSH" All a bit pathetic really.
Admin  
#29 Posted : 23 January 2009 08:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Lochlyn Ure I've done both. Diploma (1989-1991) MSc (1993-1996) Both were completely appropriate within the context of my own development at the time I did them. So it's subjective innit? And in response to David McGuire's hypothetical question earlier in the thread: " .. if you were a hiring manager and you had two potential employees to interview for a role. Both potential employees have a equal amount of experiance(several years), one holds a NEBOSH diploma and the other holds a MSC in Risk and Safety Management, who would you hire?" Neither, until I'd met them. And then I'd choose the best candidate for the job, regardless of the paperwork.
Admin  
#30 Posted : 23 January 2009 09:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David McGuire Pah cop out I think!
Admin  
#31 Posted : 23 January 2009 09:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT For what its worth I like the lot of em; and I have nothing but respect for Nebosh who helped put the qualifying aspect of our profession firmly on the map to a wider mass. Degrees? Absolutely, if it is right for you. NVQ? Spot on again and completely suitable for many already holding an exam based qualification. For many I frequently read that the NGC has been achieved by mature students who never thought they would take another exam in their life; this then led to a genuine interest in our profession and on that alone I applaud Nebosh for bringing this level of qualification for anyone to have a go at; (BSC not withstanding of course). There is right and wrong in most qualifications, as is there with some end results (as mentioned earlier on); when all is said and done; they all have a place, and long may they all continue; especially Nebosh, and again (at the risk of sounding boring I respect anyone who has achieved a qualification, especially to gain chartered status, for I know just how hard I worked to become CMIOSH, nor should it stop there either (CPD for example). The above response is just my opinion and is not intended to cause offence, disrespect etc to anyone. However if I have,I'll apologise in advance :-) Chow fer now CFT
Admin  
#32 Posted : 23 January 2009 09:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JasonGould Oh Please This is getting a little off topic now, Original Poster stated that Nebosh route is pretty much nothing more than a memory exercises and is flawed from his own experience. I can fully understand why some people whom had taken the Nebosh route would be in full disagreement with that statement and others will agree but I don't think the post was not meant to be a us V them type. I can appreciate why people do not necessarily agree with the Nebosh route (It is expensive, it does have a sense of classroom tactics and examination technique and overall it is nothing but another foundation course when you take out experience) I always thought the whole purpose of these varying routes to CMIOSH is to assist people to becoming competent in the work they do by what ever means is best for them for gaining that competence. Also note that I am in full agreement with the original poster if he is getting satisfaction out of the route he has taken no matter what route and this in no way makes him or anyone else for that matter any less better at H&S than myself (Only real life actions and achievements do that, not courses). All this said, lets be clear here Anyone claiming other routes are flawed without having actually done the other route in full is bound to stir up a bit of a hornets nest in a place where there are a diversity of course takers. Snobbery in the H&S field is a totally unjustified viewpoint from anyone because the field is so damn large, it is blatantly obvious there is no single expert or expert course out there. There are people out there that even the most in-depth courses and practical exercises won't help and they will still be a useful as a ashtray on a motorbike in some areas. Equally so there are people out there whom only need a short H&S course and whom actually have a much larger effect on H&S than any of us can ever hope to achieve. And finally, there are people out there whom do abuse the different routes resulting in bad names etc but we all must understand that this in no way undermines the intentions of the routes and equally so there are people out there whom have poured there hearts and minds and money into the learning they do. Should the industry (especially recruitment) do more to recognise other routes? Absolutely. Is one route any better than the other? Absolutely not. Am I better than you because I did this and I did than? Aint even gonna go there Will I stand up for the route I had taken? Course I will Is there sometimes an elitist viewpoint and anti elitist view point that all so often comes across on here? bah hum dum Is there often sour grapes out in the field of H&S when Nebosh is mentioned? bah hum dum again
Admin  
#33 Posted : 23 January 2009 10:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anderson8 Hi, I can only speak for myself, as everyone is different and chooses different learning methods. I took the NEBOSH cert and Diploma route and learnt a massive amount from it, in application, practice and law. I must admit, there are some course providers, in particular at certificate level who provide crash course over a short period, and maybe that could be as much as learning how to pass the exam as learning the syllabus. The tuition i received over the 12 weeks for cert and 2 years Diploma was excellent and i owe a lot to my tutors, i appreciate the knowledge i received far more the piece of paper at the end of it. What i am saying is whether you choose Dip, post grad, NVQ or whatever, if you have good tutors you will benefit. And it's knowledge we are after at the end of the day, not the badge (well, almost :-) ) Sean
Admin  
#34 Posted : 23 January 2009 20:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GaryC40 What a monstrous thread! As the original poster may i be permitted to put a lid on this? Conclusions If your interested in HS and have no formal qualifications then start with a recognised qual such as the IOSH managing safety, leading to NEBOSH Cert level...agreed? After this the world is yours. There are several routes to take all of which will ultimately lead you to your goal. I think what i have learned from posting my original comment is that there are a great number of people out there who are hard at work trying to better themselves and making a living out of trying to create a better life for themselves and others? I was surprised by the snobbery factor, this is something that i have not experienced and in NO way did i intend to look down on anyone (read my comments) To the people that commented on the fact that i have only sat NGc and Construction... fair play, i based my opinion on NGC format and feedback from colleagues and other associates. Perhaps after the PGC i will target the Nebosh Dip, then comment. In summary, i personally did not enjoy doing the NGC and do not think that learning should involve significant levels of stress. The route i have taken reduced that stress, maybe that is more about me that Nebosh. In my view learning should be an enjoyable experience not painful. Anyway guys and gals lets just get on with it and make a difference, no matter what qual we decide to target! Good luck to all new students and thanks for all the comments. Now back to the real work of passing the bloody course! Cheers everyone. Can we be pals now? Gary :)
Admin  
#35 Posted : 26 January 2009 02:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By james2000 Gary I have done 4 Nebosh qualifications,(2 Diploma,2 certificates)and just started MSc.Nebosh became Money Maker now!!!The standard is going down and a lot issues is not covered in NEBOSH courses and you need to find another course to cover that....But in other side,you will see that OHS is not complicated issue and evey where in the world is same!!! james
Admin  
#36 Posted : 26 January 2009 08:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F Gary, I did agree with you until you backed down. NEBOSH and IOSH are both based on regurgitating legislation and regulations and have no real merit in improving health and safety. I have been involved in health and safety for over 10 years and like most I pick up a book and read. I do however have strong problem solving and negotiating skills which serve me well in this background. The problem stems from companies advertising and asking for qualifications or memberships they don't understand, i.e. membership of NEBOSH with a IOSH cert. The unfortunate part is that qualifications have always been the way companies judge people, that's why we always encourage our kids to do well at school.
Admin  
#37 Posted : 26 January 2009 12:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GaryC40 I don't think i have backed down - i still strongly believe that Nebosh is way too prescriptive. However i also have respect other peoples views. As far as I'm concerned that all i have to say on the matter. Gary
Admin  
#38 Posted : 26 January 2009 13:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F Well there there then!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.