Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 25 March 2009 19:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brenda H Anyone watch this? It's on now, Weds eve 7.30-8pm on BBC1 talking about asbestos in schools. Sorry, i'm about to vent... It really annoys me when people blame the HSE for saying that it's better to leave asbestos where it is under certain circumstances, those which most of us are aware of. However, apparently the death of teachers due to asbestos related diseases are on the up and people are now asking why the HSE say it's ok to leave the asbestos blah blah blah... Why don't they start with looking at the schools and asking why head teachers and senior school staff refuse to educate themselves and deal with such H&S issues and why they will not see themselves as 'managers' of the establishments? Having worked with schools before, the majority of teachers will not take the responsibility they should for these issues. Even the head teacher on this programme said the TV programme had been an 'eye opener' for him and gave him a better understanding that amosite dust in the schools storage cupboards wasn't acceptable and needed dealing with. D'oh!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 25 March 2009 19:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By dave marshall you arent on your own with the rant the media strikes again eh??? i totaly agree with you. ignorant.... yet again
Admin  
#3 Posted : 26 March 2009 08:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Warren Fothergill Didn't see it, but I too can see the issues. Most (not all) schools come under Local Authority control, which encompasses H&S. Why these schools aren't advised of the issues by the LA's is beyond me too, but don't know if this was addressed in the programme. In my dealings with LA's their safety personnel are not too hot and the quality of work is well, shall we say, no we shan't its not right. But I'm sure you get my point. Agree, its a management issue, from the top down, including LA's. Regards Warren
Admin  
#4 Posted : 26 March 2009 09:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stephen d clarke Hi, I didn't see the programme but guessed it would be as described above full of hype. The fact of the matter is any building domestic or work pre 2001 could and probably does contain asbestos, if you have put a shelf up you've probably been exposed, what about all the increasing DIY/home refurbishment TV progs over the last 10 years how many exposed people, most of the population. I agree about the difficulties of providing training to teaching staff, although I would in no way blame them, being married to a teacher and having worked as a teacher 20 years ago I know the immense pressures such staff are under. I do not agree with the comments about all LAs, from my personnel experience working for a county council they have very robust asbestos management arrangements. In fact the council I worked for had excellent control of asbestos back in 1986 as I found out when I had to investigate concerns staff raised about an asbestos incident from then. A search in the archives revealed just how good the control had been. Steve
Admin  
#5 Posted : 26 March 2009 09:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brenda H I used to work for a LA and we had lots of schools and believe me, they used to get all the advice and support they needed, but there was this absolute refusal to seem themselves in the management/employee role that H&S legislation refers to. I agree they are under enormous pressures and budgets are tight, however they are for a lot of businesses.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 26 March 2009 10:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter If you haven't seen the programme, go here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ipl...Out_England_25_03_2009/. It is the first 10 minute item. Paul
Admin  
#7 Posted : 26 March 2009 13:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PhilP I've had the fall out from this programme already. As the programme suggested to those watching a concerned parent phoned me at 9.30 this morning, asking what arrangements were in place for managing asbestos in her child’s school. The conversation lasted for 25 minutes as I ran through the types of asbestos, where they were likely to be in the building, how they were used and what form they would take. This then led onto how the issue was managed and being dealt with. I also explained how the school in question was a lower risk than CLASP or system built schools which contained asbestos throughout most of the structure. But that also we do not have any of these types of schools in our area. The lady in question went from being very concerned, to being confident that the issue wasn’t as bad as made out in programme and was being properly managed. I have since been on-line and down loaded an outline of the programme from the Look East website; it did seem to be more aimed at problems with CLASP schools. However the programme doesn’t seem to have differentiated between system built and standard construction schools. It’s always dangerous when the media take a subject like this include peoples children and then say they’re all being exposed to a substance like asbestos (what ever happened to dangerous dogs and mobile phone radiation?). Phil
Admin  
#8 Posted : 26 March 2009 14:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Herring I find Warren's comment quite offensive. He deems fit to comment on a programme he hasn't watched, question LA's safety advisers competence and service they provide schools, all in one misguided paragraph. The whole problem with programmes like these is that they do not research fully the issues and come up with sensationalist headlines. Perhaps Warren should take note.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 26 March 2009 23:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter Thanks for the i-player link. This programme didn't air outside England. Clear evidence that Asbestos isn't being managed effectively. I was alarmed at the commentary saying that AIB in the cupboard which was liberating fibres had now been "safely taped-up". Pardon? Since when was tape an effective encapsulation for a material previously capable of damage by frequent abrasion or impact (a resources cupboard in a classroom)? Should the material not have been overclad with plywood at least?
Admin  
#10 Posted : 27 March 2009 00:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Garry Mcglaid Thanks for the link Paul, It was much appreciated. And thanks Brenda for highlighting the programme not aired in Scotland (We can only handle so much Matthew Wright) I was about to mention the comment about the taped up asbestos, in fact i sat open mouthed at the comment, however Ron has voiced the concerns very eloquently. I shall attempt "probably without success" now to play devils advocate. I come from a Construction Management background, and dealt with all the major local authorities. First thing i wish to express, from my own experiences, Warren does indeed have a point. I have found the local authorities Health and Safety advisory employees to not be as stringent. Indeed many years ago when i sat my Nebosh general it mostly consisted of LA health & Safety advisors who did not wish to be there. And if i may be Frank, it spoiled my enjoyment and my experience on the course. In further roles dealing with major LAs, i found the asbestos reports i requested were nothing more than a paper chase, whenever i asked for further information i was met with a vacant expression. I have indeed instructed some of our teams to leave jobs as i was not comfortable with the plans in place. Indeed it cost my company work and future tenders much to my MDs distress, however i could sleep at night, and he knew it was the right thing to do (a good employer). Thats just an observation from experience and situations, i do not infer all LA professionals to be of that ilk, so please dont shoot me down. As stated earlier, i come from a construction background, and i know for a fact i have been exposed to asbestos, i know this for a fact. I left construction management about 10 years ago as i had found a new vocation, Health & Safety, (Well no one goes to school and tells teacher they want to be a H&S advisor) In my opinion, managing asbestos is the best policy, if managed properly, However, within most situations of the situations that were highlighted, and in most other sectors, in reality its total bunkum. I am now employed within a different sector from construction, the lack of knowledge is disturbing. I have highlighted my concerns On every level, but it is still open to abuse on a daily basis. I have now enforced an asbestos management policy with excellent support from my management, but i still find the asbestos knowledge outwith construction to be almost negligent My wife is a teacher, i have bored her till she can take no more on the exposure of asbestos in schools, indeed she is now the asbestos police in her school. But i do believe it is indeed a huge problem. I was about to thank Matthew Wright for highlighting the problem, but i shant go that far. I shall thank Brenda instead, many thanks Garry
Admin  
#11 Posted : 27 March 2009 13:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter Garry, Sorry to hear you had such a negative experience of LA H&S Advisers. I am one. Perhaps this is just another example of the great disparity of 'competency' out there?
Admin  
#12 Posted : 29 March 2009 19:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Durkin Hi All, Having now seen the programme which seems a repeat of something I have seen before, obviously like ‘The Fun Police’, the media sensationalises H&S, showing our profession in as bad a light as possible. So why do we attack ourselves? Like Bill, I found the derogatory comments about our colleagues quite offensive and unnecessary.I have worked both in industry and LAs for over 20 years each The asbestos question will always test us, however, having worked in the analysis, sampling, clearance and inspection of the material for many years, I agree with the HSEs policy of where possible manage rather than remove. The remove brigade should remember that even the best removal techniques could replace a 0.01 fibres/ml with 0.01 fibres/ml of asbestos fibres. A simple calculation of how many ml in a room of 10cum estimates how many potential asbestos fibres that represents. Having said that, there is an undoubted problem in CLASP ,system built schools without the hysteria of drawing pin asbestos fibre extraction. Regards,Paul.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.