Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 March 2009 08:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jackie Good morning everyone, I need some advice or should i say ammo to argue against yet another classic NHS internal restructure. The problem is i have been line managed and responsible for reporting H&S at Directorate level and now with this new restructure of my Directorate I will be operating health & safety within the Intergrated Governance Team which sits below executive level. In other words i have no direct link to the executive level where many of the decisions are made. I feel this move will only further dilute health & safety from the Trust board. Equally, by joining the Integrated Governance Team, which is heavily patient focused and not staff focused as is my role, i feel slightly thwarted in my capacity to function in my Health & Safety role as there could be a conflict of interest if i join the Intergrated Governance Team - as how can i audit my own team without causing conflict should i need to report the IG Team are underperformimng in H&S? Oh the joy! Any advice as to what my arguments could be or what my angle should be when i face my Director on Monday would be so so appreciated? Is there anyone else in a similar position? God bless the ole NHS eh?!? Kind regards, Jackie
Admin  
#2 Posted : 26 March 2009 09:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Warren Fothergill Are the NHS not fulfilling their duty to their employees then under the HASAWetc Act '74? Can't wait for the first incident to happen within your trust which involves an employee at work. Emphasis needs to be on the protection of the Trust's staff and obviously to the patients, but the direct risks are to employees. Look at costs of injuries through lost time, reportable (RIDDOR) accidents and ill-health (e.g. stress, fatigue is a good one too). That may give you some significant info which to work from? Regards Warren
Admin  
#3 Posted : 26 March 2009 10:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham To add to Warren's comments, are your senior managers aware of the Corporate Manslaughter Act? How would they respond if a failure of the health and safety system resulted in an employee being killed? Perhaps this might make them think again Chris
Admin  
#4 Posted : 26 March 2009 10:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By justgossip given the level of oustanding court cases, previous history of various trusts failing in their H&S duties,You should not need to be knocking on the door to get in. If climate warming does not get you then hospital trusts will. Scary thought. I would communicate with the board detailing how they might end up being prosecuted. I might also point out that it is most likely completely contary to the H&S statement of intent they have posted all over the county. After keeping the public alive it is most likely published as the number one priority. The new system will mpact on safety so I would raise a risk assessment to record its effects. garry
Admin  
#5 Posted : 26 March 2009 11:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Jackie There is also the small matter of Directors' Duties, which is being promulgated via the IOD/HSE 'Leading health and safety at work' document. Although at present a voluntary code the HSE have implied it may be enforced through legislation in the near future. Ray
Admin  
#6 Posted : 26 March 2009 12:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Blenkharn God bless the NHS indeed. Are you sure that you are not just unhappy with your new management structure and the idea that you might have lost some autonomy? Do you not trust your Directorate manager to take your reports, discuss them with you if necessary, and then to report relevant issues to the Board as appropriate? Do you believe that the Board have no intrerest in your part of their H&S responsibilities, and will forget all about it if they do not hear from you directly? The title of your message was "Getting H&S on NHS Board Agenda". I bet it is there already, and that it will stay there, though now you might not be able to send your reports directly to them. In all probability, nothing else may have changed, except perhaps that their workload will be better managed by filtering the vast amount of data they have to oversee through the the new Intergrated Governance Team. PS - that's why its called Integrated!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 27 March 2009 09:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Jackie In stating 'I need some advice or should i say ammo to argue against yet another classic NHS internal restructure', you indicate you are assuming that the proposed restructure will have a net adverse set of outcomes. Adopting a military metaphor appears to be an indication of a choice on your part of a relatively limited range of options. Whatever the structure of an organisation, the cultural issues are open to influence by those who chose appropriate metaphors and tools. So, my 'advice' is that you replace metaphors of 'ammo' with more creative tools of intervention and learn to operate at an equal or higher level of cultural competence than those you wish to influence. The history of organisational change indicates how much more fruitful influencing the cultural agenda is than investing your energy in structural battles or turf wars. As the IIRSM now appears to be leading the safety profession on the frontlines of cultural influence, you might find it useful to study the behaviour of some IIRSM members of Council - Dr. Peter Griffin in particular, who has been a model of influencing as an OSH leader and practitioner and choosing battles very, very carefully (without being reluctant to stand by employees of one of the organsations he worked for against their and his own employer in accordance with his professional ethics). RAther than misdirect time and energy on structural small print, he concentrated on cultivating a fertile network to draw on and contribute to.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 27 March 2009 12:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By justgossip the above reply to the posting, blew me away, Garry
Admin  
#9 Posted : 27 March 2009 13:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jervis First thing Kieran in english please blimey! Jackie i work for the nhs as a union safety rep for UNITE . I totally understand where you are coming from where i work is very patient only for health and safety . They just done a huge programme on slips and falls all patient based. Wnen i mentioned about staff they said thats a different issue we are an NHS trust so patients first . For non believers i have minutes of the meeting. You mention a conflict of interest well stick to your guns as they have a duty of care for staff as well as patients.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 27 March 2009 13:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan Jervis To influence policy makers, you are free to speak and listen to their English - or not. I am simply replying by offering my advice,as requested, based on my experiences of influencing policy makers instead of being repeatedly defeated by failing to respect their understanding and their responsibilities. The key to your cultural cage lies between your own ears and in Element 4 of the NEBOSH General Certificate. You remain, of course, free to stay caged and pay the price of ignorance and lack of influence.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 27 March 2009 14:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By jervis I consider my self told of.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 27 March 2009 14:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By justgossip As it is friday, I view all this stuff about culture, lets influence as a bit OTT. I am all for the driving / highway code approach to many things within my work. If you do not drive according to the rules then expect to be prosecuted. In work, this is how we work safely and if you do not comply then I will prosecute you to the point at which you will comply or take a hike. it was a shock to the work force when I inflicted this policy on them nine months ago. they now work do things a lot safer and have grown used to working this way. Going up the chain I still keep it black and white. I inform and I advise and I do not beat about the bush. The management are free to do as they like but come the day of judgement they will not plead ignorance or did not compute the significance. Its about safety and if i cannot get it politely then I will take any other action that delivers. HaHa, reads a bit harsh but in practise it works great, the lads give me coffe and fags so that end seems to be working. the boss gave a big bonus so he must be happy when I stomp in his office. So whilst a bit of politics, a bit of culture, a please and thank you, did'nt they do well has its place, do as your told gets speedy results Garry
Admin  
#13 Posted : 27 March 2009 15:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ColinPink hello, Having been in health and safety and risk management in the nhs i think the Governance team is probably the best place to be as long as Health and SAfety has a good Exec Lead to highlight things to the board. if you look at the NHSLA acute risk managment standard its clear that the vast majority of risks are clinical which is why the governance team focusses on that and i would be surprissed if you get 1/5 of the incident reports that patient safety incidents generate Keep playing the game make sure your high level risks are on the risk register, make sure you refer to the effect on "standards for better health submission" and compliance. You should still have a direct report to an exec, make sure they chair the H+S committee. work hard with the front line nurse managers thats where most of the staff are, get them raising concerns too. If you can get the Governance Manager worried about a risk to compliance the board will notice. Hope that helps
Admin  
#14 Posted : 28 March 2009 18:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stephen smith Jackie, Good thread on influencing senior managemnt behaviour, have you thought about ensuring that there is a proper organogram and where you sit in it, you will see who is above you and who reports the H&S issues into the board. This person is key and you should hold regular meetings with them, there should be specifc responsibilities and these should be reflected in the senior persons reports into the board. You should have access to the board reports. Precise and concise information from you will work to great effects if you network the issue through the verious committees. You also need to ensure that the board signs off on a proper constructive improvement plan. I had a good friend who worked for the NHS, very bureaucratic, it took 12 months to improve a simple policy and when she went off with a heart attack the consultant said it was directly linked to the frustrating system within her organisation, may i say he worked their too. Good luck, I suppose a little change is a win in your organisation regard stephen
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.