Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 May 2009 10:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fornhelper
I am a bit concerned that the HSE have advocated that employers 'should carry out a risk assessment' with regard to swine flu - see: 2009http://www.hse.gov.uk/news/2009/swineflu.htm

Surely undertaking a risk assessment is a pointless exercise when everyone knows the precautions that should be taken and every household already has a copy of the 'control measures'.

If we undertake a risk assessment we also have a duty to ensure its findings are communicated to all employees - a case of reinventing the wheel if ever I heard one!!!

I am also concerned that we are advised to "send employees displaying flu like symptoms home" and "Advise staff to stay at home if they have flu like symptoms". Surely this is the role of the medical profession and any decision on this should be made between an employee and their GP.

I have just heard someone sneeze a couple of times along the office corridor.....do I have a responsibility to go and investigate this? :-)

What do others think?

Regards
FH
Admin  
#2 Posted : 07 May 2009 10:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Some interesting observations. I did ask our Project Manager if he had considered any interventions - "no". I also asked a senior h&s person from head office, "no, waiting for Government to advise". Job done as far as I am concerned.

Off to Portugal tomorrow for a week, sun, sea and golf!
Admin  
#3 Posted : 07 May 2009 10:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
I expect the HSE are wishing to communicate in line with every other goverment department!

Most larger organisations will have some type of business continuity plans drawn up for such events.
In addition you may wish to review this area within your H&S policy in order to ensure you are taking 'reasonable practical' steps to safeguard the H&S& Well being of your employees and others?

The leaflets being distributed to every household is plain sound advice... for even seasonal flu also! Although you may wish to look at other measures to minimise the risk of spread of such virus in your workplace, such as cleaning of hard surfaces, telephones, contact with the public etc.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 07 May 2009 11:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By paulw71
I suppose there could be other issues associated with the swine flu that may neccessitate undertaking a risk assessment at some point though.
Large scale abscences could place unneccessary stresses or cause increased workloads for staff, loss due to sickness of skilled workers, supervisors, first aiders or (god forbid) health and safety managers.
Just a thought
Admin  
#5 Posted : 07 May 2009 11:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Just had a thought, some companies have contingency planning, which may include a pandemic flu outbreak. However, there is no legal requirement to have one in place as far as I am aware.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 07 May 2009 11:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
Raymond...
Correct but many insurance companies tend to ask larger organisations what they have in place and may actually request them to have a BCP
Admin  
#7 Posted : 07 May 2009 11:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fornhelper
We do have contingency plans in place (and have had these for a number of years awaiting an expected flu pandemic) - I just feel that the HSE advice doesn't really reflect the 'sensible H & S' approach that it advocates.

Raymond enjoy Portugal & golf - was there this time last year doing same - superb!!!

FH
Admin  
#8 Posted : 07 May 2009 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuff4blokes
I am also concerned that we are advised to "send employees displaying flu like symptoms home" and "Advise staff to stay at home if they have flu like symptoms". Surely this is the role of the medical profession and any decision on this should be made between an employee and their GP.

I disagree. If a sick employee is presenting a health risk to the remainder of the workforce/public then the risk must be controlled by the employer. Removal of the risk is a reasonably practicable step. This surely applies whether the employee has flu or any other contagious or infectious disease. That is quite apart from any other sensible risk management arrangements that an employer may decide to adopt in order to protect his business from mass absenteeism.

Of course, once someone is displaying symptoms they are already likely to have passed the infection to close contacts.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 07 May 2009 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
Stuff...
I may also add the point of close cooperation with HR departments as they well place a policy with regards how they wish to manage absence from such people staying at home.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 07 May 2009 13:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fornhelper
Stuff..
My point is are employers qualified to diagnose when someone is suffering from flu, contagious, infectious disease?

How do we know if someone has one of these conditions or is maybe just 'under the weather'.

Heat rash / contagious condition / minor allergy....can you in all honesty tell the difference?

FH
Admin  
#11 Posted : 07 May 2009 13:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuff4blokes
Whilst acknowledging that I am in danger of banging the drum too often and loudly there is a tendency for H&S practitioners to avoid dealing with health issues whilst embracing the "easier" safety aspects of our role.

A Campbell has correctly pointed out that it is often a HR function to manage absence and I certainly accept that medics are much more likely to be able to recognise and diagnose disease than most of us. However, in the absence of either of these services it must be up to health and safety people to advise, manage or implement, according to our job function, suitable measures to prevent the spread of any disease in the workplace. This will include hygiene, education, instruction and removal of the sources of infection.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 08 May 2009 01:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GaryC40
IMO - Employers certainly should send employees home (or advise visit to GP) if they are displaying signs of ill health.

To clarify - yes, most people are qualified to make this decision.

They are in work to WORK not to cough and splatter all over colleagues.

omg!

Admin  
#13 Posted : 08 May 2009 11:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham
How will the non-specialist know if it is swine flu or ordinary flu? This is a relevant question in one sense, since ordinary flu is still vastly more common in this country than swine flu. It take a laboratory test to establish that it is swine flu.

As a sensible precaution I would recommend sending anyone home who appears to be suffering from flu, if only to reduce the risk that they will infect others.

Chris
Admin  
#14 Posted : 08 May 2009 11:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Coshh Assessor
Why would you need to know what sort of flu it is? (Other than man flu of course.)
Admin  
#15 Posted : 08 May 2009 11:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jem
I am currently indentifying certain areas of our business that may be at higher risk of exposure due to the nature of their roles.

During a pandemic scenario our employees who are accessing the Care Sector will be at higher risk of infection than others.

My findings will form part of our controls and business continuity plans, it seems like good practice to me.

Jem
Admin  
#16 Posted : 08 May 2009 12:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
Hi Jem,

Planning is always a good thing... Although during a pandemic scenario i would expect your risk levels to rise throughout, but if exposed in the care sector (e.g. hospitals) I would also expect you would also be required to adopt the authority measures also?
Admin  
#17 Posted : 08 May 2009 14:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin J Morley
Fornhelper,

My reading of this HSE page was that the advice to carry out a risk assessment is only in respect of the use of face masks in higher risk situations.

It's certainly no use waiting until staff are facing sick people to think about what mask is required and whether it fits, etc.

This would then form a part of the larger risk assessment and provide the basis for staff training.

martin

Admin  
#18 Posted : 08 May 2009 21:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Durkin
Hi All,
The advice regards face masks is now getting contradictory.The leaflet given to the public quotes"the available scientific evidence shows that these basic face masks DON'T protect people from becoming infected" ok fair enough, the simple face masks at PF1 are probably useless.I thought surgical masks were used to protect the patient from the surgeon.Hence probably of some use if worn in this case by the infected person, although limited.However the HA are now starting to advocate the use of these masks for carers in care homes ??
What has spun this?
Regards,Paul
Admin  
#19 Posted : 09 May 2009 08:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham
Paul

I have to agree with your comments! IMO the whole swine flu thing is getting out of proportion.

Consider that apparently in 2008 30,000 people died in the USA from ordinary flu.

I would like answers to two questions:

1. Is swine flu more infectious that ordinary flu?
2. Is swine flu more lethal than ordinary flu?

Perhaps someone out there can provide the answers, but I have failed to find them so far.

When we have the answers to these questions, then perhaps we can do a risk assessment and decide what precautions we should take that we are not taking already with regard to ordinary flu.

Chris
Admin  
#20 Posted : 11 May 2009 13:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin J Morley
There was a link, http://www.timesonline.c...tors/article6236170.ece, an article by David Spiegelhalter, Winton Professor of the Public Understanding of Risk at the University of Cambridge.
He says that the 'reproductive number' seems quite low, but really gave up on assigning risk.
How can we do better?
martin
Admin  
#21 Posted : 11 May 2009 14:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By harrison1
Emergency planning for any organisation has to be good idea & in terms of the flu pandemic then a Risk Assessment may seem a bit over the top to the H&s practitioner but don't forget that in a pandemic you may find key staff are off work not only with flu but may also have child care issues as well as a host of issues that come to light in the course of a pandemic.
Health & safety in a flu pandemic would need planning for as their is information needed for staff ,training of staff & the implications of job swapping to keep services maintained.
If a flu pandemic does come our way there is no doubt that time is not on our side.
sending people home may seem difficult at the onset of a pandemic but i think you may change your mind if it does become a killer strain.

Steve
Admin  
#22 Posted : 11 May 2009 16:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Son of SkyWalker
Stuff4blokes

I don't agree with the part of your posting as follows:

"it must be up to health and safety people to advise, manage or implement, according to our job function, suitable measures to prevent the spread of any disease in the workplace"

I think this would come under occupational health professionals, in the workplace, who are trained and competent to make these decisions.

Lets not get Health and Safety mixed up with Occupational Health.

I also believe the whole outbreak whilst worrying has been blown totally out of proportion.

Son of Skywalker
Admin  
#23 Posted : 11 May 2009 16:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kenneth Patrick
"Surely undertaking a risk assessment is a pointless exercise when everyone knows the precautions that should be taken "

I agree but that does usually stop us H&S folk, we seem to feel the need to get RA into everything.

Ken
Admin  
#24 Posted : 11 May 2009 16:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
Fact is... unless other legislation is rushed through... As an employer you will still need to take 'reasonably practical' measures to protect your employees and others.

I'm sure some legal beagles will be rubbing their hand in anticipation of potential litigation and civil claims if such a scenario emerges?

And that is without the Business Continuity element a large employer may wish to look at in order to keep their business running as uninterrupted as possible!
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.