IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
COSHH - Emergency procedures in a laboratory
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Helen
Hi guys,
what are people doing to comply with Reg 13 in COSHH which states you should foresee what emergencies might occur within your work area, and then put in place appropriate emergency plans.
We are looking at this currently and would be interested to know what other labs do.
We have already identified our high hazard liquids and have a calculation tool (which takes into account the vapour pressure of a material and airflow through the lab to work out rate of evaporation, approximate concentration of vapour above the spill and time taken to mop up the spill) We compare this to the WEL and decide if it is safe for staff to clean up themselves or if they have to evacuate their work area.
However it is not so easy to do for solids as we do not always know the particle size, rate of settling etc so it is difficult to estimate the concentration of dust that might be generated from a spillage and hence if it is safe to clean up with /without appropriate RPE or if evacuation is necessary.
What are you people doing?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Helen
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Helen
What sort of powders are your employees handling?
Paul
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Helen
Paul,
it can be a number of things eg. carbon black pigment, ammonium persulphate, cyanuric chloride, potassium cyanide.
Some are fluffy powders, some are quite large particle sizes - but for most we dont have particle size analysis.
Helen
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
Helen
You could rate the substances by acute toxicity, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, etc. Those high on the scale would require RPE and skin protection, those lower on the scale probably skin protection only. It is difficult to be prescriptive and you may need to use your scientific intuition up to a point.
Of course, if any of the substances are reproductive toxins, you should also take into account the gender of the person cleaning up the spillage. Even if the risk of harm is low, women may be reluctant to do the cleaning if there is a risk to their reproductive health. Of course, some substances affect males and the same issue may apply to them.
Paul
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By PL
Helen,
Assuming that these are products you buy in rather than are formed in the laboratories, you should get some of the data you need off the suppliers Product Data Sheet, not off the MSDS.
Particle size and relative densities should be quoted.
PL
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adam Worth
hmm this post has got me thinking :) I'm not going to provide a useful answer I'm affraid but some thoughts that might help...
I would say you are probably doing much more than other labs by the sound of it already :)
What level of toxicity do these powders present and how much is likely to be spilt? I would say working out exposure limits post spillage is going to be really difficult.
I would work on worst case for my calcs - i.e. all powder in the air?
Then again if you have emergency response teams to clean this type of spillage do they have BA / chem suits etc? if so as spillage of this magnitude is rare (i assume?) then overkill PPE may be the best option.
I guess you are looking for away to decide when it should be left to teh fire brigade?
As well as exposure don't forget if these dusts are oxidisable they may present an explosion risk too!
What happens if you spill one two of these dusts together? or any other mixture... I dropped a bottle of Nitric acid - luckily the HCL I dropped too was in a safe-break bottle!!
Again this all depends on quantities. Are you looking for COMAH level repsonse, or are we talknig a man with vaccumn cleaner?
Use the manufactures!! They will have spillage procedures of their own and can probable provide more information.
if you let us know a bit more about the situaton you might get more relevant information.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Helen
Guys, thanks for the info so far. A few things to note.
I am prioritising very high hazard solids first - which have WEL's of between 0.01 and 0.1 mg/m3.
The calcs I have done so far assume that we spill 500g of material, of which 20% has a particle size of 100 microns, so is inhalable and of that 20% becomes airborne on spillage filling a 10M3 volume to which the operator is exposed for 10 mins whilst cleaning up.
It is scary to find that using this data we can obtain 260 times the WEL for most of the solids, so NO RPE would be suitable !
I have been challenged on my assumptions for the calc, which is wht I am asking what does everyone else out there do.
I am looking at high hazard materials alone for now, so oxidisables and mixtures have not yet been thought about.
For info the fire brigade have told us that they will NOT be used as a chemical clean up service (new to us !) and we have no BA currently in place.
If there is no easy answer to this we may have to say evacuate the lab and bring in a BA Team to clean up the spillage of any powder. AS you say it should be an infrequent event.
Helen
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adam Worth
Good to see you;ve thought about it tho!
What is the make up of the lab? could a sprinkler type system be used to wash away / suppress powders? (A chemical plant i worked on used to do this for some gases)
Can the high risk ones be limited to a confined area?
Can quanties be limited to smaller containers? i.e. 250g max.
I would try asking a PPE supplier such as 3M for help on RPE options.
Hopefully Paul can help further :)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By D H
May I suggest that you have identified your own problem? The clean up is caused as a result of the spill. So target the spill causation first.
I would suggest that the chemicals are also expensive so a double win in the offing.
Dave
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By D. Hilton
Helen
There was a suggestion in an earlier reply that you may have to consider explosion risk.Based on your conservative estimate of 20g airborne particles and taking into account the typical LEL for particulates are in the order of 100-500g/m3, an explosion risk is not presented in this scenario.
As for settling velocities, for 100 micron particles and having a density similar to carbon black i.e 2.25g/cm3, the approximate settling velocity is 0.63 cm/sec.
Given the above,I would expect the particles in a typical spill/release to settle in approx 30-60 seconds.
I would not agree that the release would result in the dispersion and homogeneous mixing throughout the entire 10 m3 volume of the enclosure and would be surprised if the release were to have a volume of upto 1 m3.
Provided the containers are kept sealed during transfer to and from storage and point of dispensary I would find it unlikely that these PE containers would fail on impact from a normal carrying height above the floor or above a bench.
Again, I would reasonably expect a release to occur from the spatula during dispensing or toppling/dropping open container from a modest height above a bench/fume cupboard.
I would also take a look at the spillage history within the department and frequency of handling of these particulates. It also may be worth considering the provision of LEV or other containment at the dispensary/point of use.
Regards
D
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Helen
Mant thanks D for your help - most useful !!
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
COSHH - Emergency procedures in a laboratory
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.