Rank: New forum user
|
I read John Holden's complaint to the BBC and their reply with interest (News and Reviews - Nov 13).
This morning, as I drove to work, I listened to some of Terry's show, he described his 'near miss' on Friday night when 200-weight of chain landed 2 feet away from where he was standing during the live Children in need broadcast. Needless to say, Terry didn't make any jokes about the incident, or about Health and Safety 'officials' in general, perhaps this has helped him realise that health and safety professionals are working extremely hard to protect us all from the everyday dangers to our safety and our health and have a little more respect for them in future.
Ian.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Perhaps Wake up to Wogan has finally Woken up to Safety!?!
Badger
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Did it fall?
Or was it pushed...
;-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Well done for coming out and saying that Alan, We were all thinking it!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Now theres a way to raise money for children in need!!!!
would the mods allow a top 10 list of "victims" perhaps?
i think not.
:)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
What comes round goes round - eventually.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Now then - the near miss did happen and could have resulted in a really serious accident, even a fatality!
I just wonder of Sir Terry might just have an even worse opinion of us H&S professionals, because, if the BBC safety person had done the risk assessments properly, if at all, the equipment would not have fallen?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Chris, I guess it's a case of damned if you do...either way Sir Terry wins. The moral of the story is get a job as a critic or even better, working for the Client - they're never wrong either!
Ray
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The H&S person does not do the risk assessment.
They put systems in place and training in place to allow the competent person, who is going to undertake the activity, to perform and document foreseeable hazards and assign risk values. This then should feed into the operating procedure to make it a safe operating procedure.
Maybe they did not consider that potentially killing Wogan was a big hazard. They may have performed a hazard v's benefit analysis. Was the potential benefit worth the risk?!?!?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
They may have performed a hazard v's benefit analysis. Was the potential benefit worth the risk?!?!?
More likely they could up the tv raings and as it was that charity show perhaps SirT was doing a sponsored 'Try and hit me' gig.
Badger
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.