Rank: Super forum user
|
Can anyone point me to the definition of "close supervision" in a pre-school nursery context?
I've trawled the Care Commission website and Googled exhaustively without success.
Much obliged.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I presume you mean the number of adults against number of kids, if thats the case I believe its 4/5 kids per adult maximum
SB
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Also the NSPCC may be able to help
Its interesting to note that many children situations are not covered by any particular law
1 funny aspect is that until 18:00 hours a professional child minder is subject to all kinds of controls but after 18:00 hours all the controls vanish [I may be out of date so please correct me?] but I am lead to believe that was the case ~5 years ago when a friend looked into becoming an official child minder. She pulled out because she could not get her head around such gaping holes in an otherwise good system
Additionally she was expected to be a first aider where the first aid regs do not apply to the children and as she was working on her own she may not have been able to give first aid to herself if she really needed it in any case!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
No idea myself but I wonder if either ofsted or kidrapt may be able to point you in the right direction?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
When I was in the coal mining industry we regarded 'close personal supervision' to mean that the superviser could touch the person they were supervising e.g. within arms length.
In relation to the educational environment there is guidance somewhere which specifies teacher/pupil ratios. I only know the ones that I have already come across and am not sure where it is written down. In schools where the pupils have additional needs some of the subject areas (e.g. craft, design and technology) the maximum number of pupils the teacher can supervise is 6, whereas in mainstream schools it is 20.
In relation to excursions and trips there is a Scottish Executive publication which recommends a maximum of 15 pupils to one teacher/adult supervisor, with an expectation that the risk assessment will further define this.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
P: TA for your input but neither ofsted or kidrapt nor any part of social services etc have made any comments!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thanks for the coal industry parallel Bob.
We can of course define 'close supervision' from obvious dictionary definition and a fair amount of case law (and the recent tragedy at Whitby may also qualify in the coming months). Just to be clear though, I'm looking for definition of "close supervision" from the perspective & context of the governing body, if indeed the term has been defined by them.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I did some risk assessments for a small charity I am part of, for a procession. I was told that outdoors it's 1 teacher to 8 for tinies and 1 to 15 for seniors,
John
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.