Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
kojo  
#1 Posted : 29 January 2011 10:47:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
kojo

Dear All, I wish not to bore you with this topic which has been discussed on a number of times. I took over from a guy who claim to have over 35 years health and safety, yet even basic things like Risk Assessment was poorly done and nothing seems right. Can we really say the more experienced you are, the more competent you are ? When can we say a Health and Safety proffessional is competent to carry out his?her role. Thanks
Jane Blunt  
#2 Posted : 29 January 2011 12:00:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

Clearly not. Consider two extreme experiences: A) There are people whose 25 years experience consists of 1 year's experience repeated 25 times. B) Others use their 25 years to study, reflect, grow and develop their skills. They really do have 25 years experience. Time is important, those at the beginning of their careers have not had enough time to become fully competent, but clearly what you do with your time is just as important as having it! CPD is a worthy attempt to sort out A from B.
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#3 Posted : 29 January 2011 14:50:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Be careful apau77 You assume it is you who is right, and that your predecessor was wrong. Are you sure of that? It may be the other way around. It might be a bit of both, or it may just be a matter of perception and you are both right (or for that matter both wrong). I have just been asked to step in at short notice and teach on another degree course. Don't worry, I was told, the previous lecturer had great slides and handouts and all the work is done for you, just turn up and talk. But its not like that. I know the previous lecturer and how good she is. The slides look great. But for a 15 week year 3 module they are not what I would expect. Lots of important topics omitted completely, others glossed over at the expense of some padding elsewhere. But step back and, of course, the work is of an excellent standard - its just that she took a different approach to mine. Get a third person in and they might say we are both wrong and that the course needs a still different structure and content that neither of us had considered. And the same may happen to you. So do think twice about your criticisms. And perhaps keep them to yourself unless you are so sure that you would gamble your job on it as your employer might see things differently from you.
BenjaminA  
#4 Posted : 29 January 2011 19:09:19(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
BenjaminA

It is about the perception you make and approach you take about a given circumstance. Both could be right when viewed from different angles. My Manager a much more experienced person than myself likes to manage health and safety from the field himself. He likes to make corrective action in the field itself rather than make structured procedures and implement it through the higher management. He could be right when viewed through his eyes or similar pairs of eyes.
Plant trainer  
#5 Posted : 30 January 2011 12:51:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Plant trainer

You judge competence and experience as though they are one and the same, a mistake often made. Competence is a marriage of knowledge experience and prcatical application. Like any marriage, for it to be successful each individual has to play their part. It's no good having years of experience if you haven't learned from the bad, just as it is no use having the knowledge if you don't learn how to apply it from the experiences of others. Just like everything else in life it's about putting the right team together if you want to succede. Using myself as an example, I have thirty years experience in my field but have only recently gained any formal qulification in the field of health and safety, I have a number of colleagues who are very qualified as safety advisors, no one in the team believes thay are better than anyone else and we all freely seek out advice from each other. Halth ans Safety is not a field to be in if you have an inflated ego....
kevbell  
#6 Posted : 30 January 2011 17:52:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
kevbell

Spot on Plant trainer things have a habit of biting ones back side
kojo  
#7 Posted : 30 January 2011 20:34:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
kojo

That is what I do not get from the rest of SHE Advisors, they think competency is how about experience.
kojo  
#8 Posted : 30 January 2011 20:42:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
kojo

I believe that Competence is of knowledge experience and prcatical application and as you rightly said, we always for to consult each other but I get frustrated we other make me feel that is only about how long you have been in the job only.
Fletcher  
#9 Posted : 31 January 2011 14:13:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Fletcher

Apau, I would add qualifications into your mix of competence. I cannot comment on your predecessor but I would ask, a) were the risk assessments and/or safe systems of work read and understood by those doing the job? b) were they followed? c) did the company have a high rate of incidents and/or a high rate of harm? d) was c) above following a decreasing trend year on year? If the answers are Yes, Yes, No, Yes then your predecessor may have been using their 35 years experience effectively without overburdening documentation. If the answers are No, No, Yes, No then I would say that things need to change. Take Care
Phil Grace  
#10 Posted : 06 February 2011 20:40:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Phil Grace

Apau, Can not remember the exact case off the top of my head but competence was defined by a judge. He said that it involved a mix of technical expertise and practical knowledge. Thus a newly qualfied graduate is NOT competent. Equally a time served electrician of many years experience may not be fully competent (since they may not have the technical expertise to suport their obvious practical knowledge.) If I can track down the citation I'll let you know. Phil
Phil Grace  
#11 Posted : 06 February 2011 20:53:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Phil Grace

Apau, Silly me...!! It is also set down in the Management Regs where there is a reference to "...sufficient knowledge, experience and skills..." There is no mention of time...... The Case Law is Skips v Gibson 1964 Phil
Blair McFarlane  
#12 Posted : 08 February 2011 11:49:33(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Blair McFarlane

I believe, that an accepted definition of Competent, is - Someone who has "Knowledge, Training, Experience and understanding of the process being undertaken." Read from that what you may, I personally think that a balance of all of the aforementioned traits can in certain circumstances equate to competence, however that will entirely depend on whether you work in a specific field or in a generic field. The old saying still rings true today, " Jack of all trades, Master of none".
DHM  
#13 Posted : 08 February 2011 17:19:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DHM

Ok What about.... Skills, Knowledge, Attitude, Experience. A CMIOSH once explained that to me on a course.
DHM  
#14 Posted : 08 February 2011 17:21:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DHM

Ok that should have read, Skills, Knowledge, Attitude, Training, and Experience (aagh where's the edit button).
Plant trainer  
#15 Posted : 08 February 2011 17:42:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Plant trainer

No one on here ever had a bad experience? I have known a few people over the years who could claim 30 years experience but struggled when it came to proving competence.For example it's very rare a new enployee fresh out of novice training will remove a guard of thier own volition, whereas old Fred who worked here for years knows better and will leave a guard off if he thinks it's in his way, after all we ran the plant for years with no guards on.......every coin has two sides. Experience can teach bad practice as well as good, if it ever changes we can stop providing refresher training on a 3-5 year cycle as per the HSE recommendations.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (6)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.