Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Tim Eldridge  
#1 Posted : 11 August 2011 14:22:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Tim Eldridge

An underground car park under our control has an air extraction system to remove exhaust fumes etc. I'm unclear as to whether this system would be defined as LEV - it's not really very "local" as it's a large car park. We will be having it serviced, inspected and tested annually anyway, so will meet the thorough examination and test requirements for LEV, but am just curious as to whether any of you would deem this to be LEV?
descarte8  
#2 Posted : 11 August 2011 14:33:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
descarte8

the definition I have (cant queote source) is: "LEV can be defined as any fixed or portable powered air extraction system, whose function is to control, or contribute to the control of, harmful airborne substances, by drawing them away from the worker's breathing zone. The definition of LEV does not include room extractor fans, open vents providing passive air changes, or removing heat from ovens, nor vacuum cleaners (except where the vacuum cleaner is a dedicated engineering control measure stipulated under a COSHH assessment)." So question - is it being used to control exposures, rather than to aid natural / general ventilation? From what you said above I think it is.
PH2  
#3 Posted : 11 August 2011 15:05:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PH2

Tim, with respect to the previous poster, I disagree that it is LEV. The components of an LEV system include a hood and ducting at the point where contaminants / fumes etc are generated (see HSG 258) and where they may be breathed in by a worker. However enclosed Car Park ventilation is specifically covered by the Building Regulations, Part B, Fire Safety, Section 11.6. This requires six air changes per hour and ten in the event of a fire.
Tim Eldridge  
#4 Posted : 11 August 2011 15:12:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Tim Eldridge

Thanks PH2 - that would have been my conclusion, too. Do you know if there is any standards that cover the ongoing maintenance/test etc of such extraction units?
PH2  
#5 Posted : 11 August 2011 16:56:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PH2

Tim, I'm not aware of any specific requirement, as there could be so many variables, (frequency of use, volume throughput, size and type of units etc.) but would of course recommend maintenance and testing per manufacturers recommendations. PH2
PH2  
#6 Posted : 11 August 2011 17:08:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PH2

Tim, I have managed to locate a possible British Standard - BS 7346 part 7 Components for smoke and heat control systems for covered car parks. I don't have access to the document, but a main library / university usually has access to the full set of standards. Good luck! PH2
Tim Eldridge  
#7 Posted : 11 August 2011 17:30:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Tim Eldridge

Thanks PH2 - I'll dig out the BS
chris.packham  
#8 Posted : 12 August 2011 08:41:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

I think that this is what my old mentor on LEV would have called 'dilution ventilation'. Chris
bob youel  
#9 Posted : 12 August 2011 10:19:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

If U evaluate COSHH properly U will see that it applies
kenty  
#10 Posted : 12 August 2011 10:55:47(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
kenty

BS7346-7 basically states the system should be "maintained and tested in accordance with BS5588-12 (Fire precautions in the design, construction and use of buildings) as well as in accordance with the suppliers documentation".
broadvalley  
#11 Posted : 12 August 2011 10:59:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
broadvalley

I think that this is what my old mentor on LEV would have called 'dilution ventilation'. Or as my old LEV mentor would have said "dilution is no solution" Not sure COSHH applies - surely parking your car is not a direct at work activity
HSSnail  
#12 Posted : 12 August 2011 13:13:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Broadvalley But what about the car park attendant (if there is one) etc? Brian
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.