Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
m  
#1 Posted : 26 August 2011 15:53:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

I want to put together an A5 giude to office stairwell safety to remind users of good practice. I have the following list, can you add any more? I am keen to make it a 'level' message and not get any 'elf & safety' feedback from the staff: No drinks in open containers; One hand free for the handrail; No running; No skipping steps; Not using the phone; Report the following: Defective lighting, lifting carpets, loose nosings and hand rails
Clairel  
#2 Posted : 26 August 2011 16:00:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

You're kidding right? 'elf n safety'.
MB1  
#3 Posted : 26 August 2011 16:01:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

So many No's may come back with No to too many elf & signs? How about please take care when going up & down the stairs? No drinks in open containers.... rule for canteen point No running... general rule anywhere Skipping steps....Not using phone... is this especially significant on stairs historically? All these and more can be covered in the induction day and toolbox/reminder days??
MB1  
#4 Posted : 26 August 2011 16:01:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

oops elf & safety signs
Graham Bullough  
#5 Posted : 26 August 2011 16:57:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Crikey - I'd be in breach of two of the bits of the advice as I sometimes run up or down the stairs in the 6 storey building where I'm based, and on some occasions use only alternative steps. A minor part in trying to maintain my sylph-like (?) figure plus fitness for hillwalking. Also, if I can ascend all the stairs in one go without feeling too tired at the top I know I'm reasonably fit. However, in my defence about running and/or skipping steps, I also tend to keep one hand on a handrail during ascents and descents. A suggested addition to the notice is "Avoid stairs if wearing high heeled shoes". This is guaranteed to provoke some reaction. In fact, consider replacing the notice with "for your safety's sake, use the lift!" (if there is one!) or even make people make a decision with "Stairs are healthier while lifts are safer!" Okay, that's been partly in jest, especially as today is Friday for some frivolity on this forum. On a more serious note, the advice about not using the phone is especially apt. Increasing numbers of people in all sorts of situations, including on stairways, seem intent on using their phones to read or compose text messages, and are therefore oblivious of where they're walking or what's happening around them. Also, people carrying drinks on stairways and other smooth impervious surfaces is another of my pet hates because some spillage tends to occur and the people involved don't bother to do anything about the increased slip risk they've caused. To echo MB1's comments, any sign should try and avoid the word "no". Also, is such a sign with only text an effective way of trying to influence people's behaviour? How about cartoons instead? Well designed cartoons may be far more effective than words if they are likely to be retained as mental images in people's minds. In addition or alternatively, advice/reminders during inductions and team meetings/toolbox talks may be more effective.
messyshaw  
#6 Posted : 26 August 2011 17:15:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

It can't be just me who thinks this sounds like a mandate from the 'Ministry of Stating The Bleeding Obvious' (Located next to The Ministry of Silly Walks). I hate over-signage and elf & safetyesque patronising messages (such as this hot coffee might be hot etc). This proposed sign sounds like my worst nightmare! Please assure me this is a Friday post an not a serious proposal!!!!!!!!
Chris c  
#7 Posted : 26 August 2011 18:07:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Chris c

Is it mad Friday what ever happened to common sense ! I am sure there are greater risks to address within your business? Chris
Ron Hunter  
#8 Posted : 26 August 2011 23:32:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Well intentioned m, but the A5 booklet probably isn't the best way. Others have been quick to mock, which for me is of some concern. 'Slips ands trips' is up there as one of the leading causes of accident and injury, HSE's "shattered lives" campaign has a fairly high profile and this is a high priority topic for the HSE Inspectorate should they come a-calling. Cover these issues at Induction by all means. Check your own accident stats. Conduct some observations and take the issue back to your employee consultation forum. Get some serious buy-in from your people and your management. Maybe a few posters downloaded from HSE site. You need to consider people tracking in with wet feet when it's raining too. Make sure all the physical aspects you mention (not forgetting the state of the handrails) is captured in pro-forma for your regular formal workplace inspection regime. You have to keep things real, otherwise your employees will desert the stairs in favour of the lifts for fear of being caught by the "stair police"!
Zimmy  
#9 Posted : 27 August 2011 07:40:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

I sometimes wonder what the point is in being here. Am I back in the school yard or what? Is this topic for real? I promise not to use my space hopper, skateboard, stilts and micro light on the stairs. Some folks need to get a grip on life and do some real work instead of thinking up some sort of justification for the post they hold.
pete48  
#10 Posted : 27 August 2011 20:11:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

Perhaps those who feel this is a wind up topic might find a read of the following research report from 2005 of some interest? http://www.hse.gov.uk/re...hsl_pdf/2005/hsl0510.pdf A couple of copy-text from the report are “Awareness campaigns to implement behavioural changes for stair behaviour is an avenue which deserves further exploration. Lessons can be learnt from private companies who have successfully implemented behavioural changes relating to stair use in their employees.” “To fall down stairs is not only to fall off a cliff, but to fall on rocks below, for the nosing of steps presents a succession of sharp edges” (Templer et al, 1978). This quote depicts how a fall on a staircase may be likened to falling from a great height, but also that injuries may be made more serious by virtue of the bumpy landing that follows.” I also remember the stair rules given by a well known multi-national many years ago and these are also quoted in the report. “There are five stair rules within the organisation, these are: 1. Use lifts if your hands are full 2. Always hold handrails 3. Do not read documents 4. Do not use mobile phones 5. Do not run. I think your proposal to put something together to cover this area is a very sensible approach. Only you can know whether it would need a different method to introduce it because that depends entirely on the H&S culture that you have in the company. I would expect it to be covered by your induction as has been said. However, as with all other matters in the induction that doesn’t mean it can then be forgotten altogether. So I would go ahead using the best means to suit your organisation, P48
m  
#11 Posted : 28 August 2011 09:37:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

This is a 'real' thread' and not a Friday one so thanks for the range of feedback provided, both positive and negative. There are bigger fish to fry here and this is a low priority but I do have ex oil & gas industry people who expect stair behaviour to be dictated. There are instances of overloaded employees complete with cups of coffee spilling their way between stairs and not clearing up after themselves. Also people texting as they use the stairs. My issues is how to approach this without giving the wrong impression but creating the right balance of priority. An A5 poster campaign is what I want, not a booklet (sorry - guide was ambiguous in original post). Thanks
Ron Hunter  
#12 Posted : 28 August 2011 23:29:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

A5? More of a stamp than a poster!!
David M Stewart  
#13 Posted : 29 August 2011 12:16:04(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
David M Stewart

Stairway safety is paramount, when you look at statistics they show that there a considerable amount of injuries, incidents, near misses that occur on stairs. I agree with the cartoon posters rather than the "you must do" approach as this approach sometimes works negatively as most people don't like the being told what to do approach. The subject of stairway safety maybe highlighted at any safety meetings that your company may have, meaning mass coverage of people in the workplace then an introduction to expectations for new personnel or visitors, it also could be a good subject for the safety committee to highlight on any awareness campaigns.
Clairel  
#14 Posted : 29 August 2011 15:32:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

David M Stewart wrote:
Stairway safety is paramount, when you look at statistics they show that there a considerable amount of injuries, incidents, near misses that occur on stairs.
Paramount? Really? Paramount means it's the most important thing. You must work in a very low risk industry. You lot can continue to give health and safety a bad name by telling people how to walk up and down stairs and I'll just stick to the real health and safety stuff thank you.
RayRapp  
#15 Posted : 29 August 2011 18:44:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Hmmm I notice that no one has mentioned about wearing high heels...perhaps this is just a bit too 'safe' for some people.
pete48  
#16 Posted : 29 August 2011 20:28:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

Claire, if I may assume that you are saying “don’t do this first. there may be other more important things to have sorted and controlled first” then I agree. However your later comments about real H&S suggest something different. I have a long experience of working in very mature H&S cultures where the topic is seen as just another part of risk control. I will accept that in other less mature cultures it needs to be carefully managed but that doesn’t mean it can be ignored. It is misleading to suggest that only those in very low risk sectors can or should concern themselves with such matters. Wherever one trips and or falls on a stairway then the outcomes and any consequences can be and often are no different. For example, some of the most serious injuries I recorded whilst working on an oil refinery resulted from slips and falls on stairways. As to whether one has to “tell people how to walk up or down stairs”. In order to establish any positive culture one has to set out standards and behaviours. As one can see from simple observation in any public or work environment most people do not use stairways in a safe manner. They have learnt that they can get away with doing all sorts of things and not get hurt until........... Thus a change in task method and behaviour may well be needed in order to ensure they behave in a proper manner whilst working for their employer. In fact, in just the same way as they do for many other everyday tasks they undertake. How one achieves that change is dependent on the specific circumstances of the individual employer. I am not suggesting for one moment that this is likely to be “paramount” in a generic sense. I am suggesting that labelling any discussion and management of the topic as “elf n safety” does an equal disservice to H&S.
srichards  
#17 Posted : 29 August 2011 20:54:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
srichards

A cartoon type poster is probably better - think how many times you look at the poster by the side of pools while you are swimming. I would probably add "not carrying large/heavy items up/down stairs" and "reporting of spills" so that they can be cleared up quickly. Can you find some accident stats to put in the posters relating to all the points you raise ? That might help staff understand the concerns you are raising - I know people that have tripped from the bottom stair at their homes and made a pretty big mess of their ankles.
Clairel  
#18 Posted : 29 August 2011 21:08:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

In all my years I have only once had to investigate a stair accident in the workplace and that was due to faulty edging strips in a public place. I do not consider walking up and down a stairwell (in the context of stairs between floors of a building) as being part of a work activity. Whilst I am fully aware of accident stats of people using stairs (in domestic scenarios too) I do not believe that it is the responsibility of the employer unless related to the condition and suitability of that stairwell. If there are lots of accidents on those stairs I would suggest that it is more down to the inherent properties of that stairwell, or condition of that stairwell. EG, inapproporiate surface, poor edging, poor lighting, poor maintenance or poor cleaning regime. Occasional one off accidents due to human carelessness maybe but lots of accidents then something else is happening IMO. So if you're at the point of having to tell people how to use the stairs because you have so many accidents then you're coming at it from the wrong angle. If someone tries to tell me not to carry a coffee up a flight of stairs, or not to take two stairs at a time and that I must use the handrail provided....well they wouldn't get a pleasant response. Try and treat me like a child and I'll behave like a child.
messyshaw  
#19 Posted : 29 August 2011 21:53:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

Clairel - I couldn't agree more with your last two posts 98.9% of my job is about 'selling' the concept of H&S (In my case fire safety)in order to get people to take the matter seriously. You ain't ever going to get 100% of staff on board, but faced with the constant barrage of 'elf and safety' DM type press, I try to come across as pragmatic, sensible and proportionate - mainly in attempt to smother the assumption that I (& H&S) is all about jobsworths & pathetic rules. I strongly believe that those who insist on pushing the obvious 'the hot apple filling in this pie may be hot' type messages are doing a disservice to the H&S profession (regardless of their most professional intentions of reducing risk). I am not criticising anyone who posts here (or their professionalism & motivation), but I just want to suggest an alternative H&S communication strategy which I believe can be more successful than messages which could be interpreted as patronising. Let's keep it real eh?
Guru  
#20 Posted : 29 August 2011 22:30:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Guru

I came across an old HSE study on stairwell safety that some looking into this area may find useful. www.hse.gov.uk/research/hsl_pdf/2005/hsl0510.pdf
Ron Hunter  
#21 Posted : 29 August 2011 23:02:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Thanks for that Guru. Whilst the stats are a bit old, it's notable that stairs are second only to ladders w.r.t. falls. Presumably there are those who don't think that important either...............
RayRapp  
#22 Posted : 29 August 2011 23:16:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

There are two issues here as I see it. First, some things in life are inherently risky and there is little one can do about it ie walking up and down stairs. Second, in all the working environments I have worked in (nuclear, construction, rail, etc) I have never had any concerns or dealings with people falling down stairs. God forbid I ever have to put in controls for people using stairways, I would hang up my hard hat tomorrow. On lighter but similar note, some while ago someone posted an enquiry from an accident claims solicitor regarding a personal injury at work - a person falling down the stairs. The solicitor asked for a RA and evidence of training. The response was 'we do not provide RAs and as for training, you will need to speak with their parents or guardians'.
Clairel  
#23 Posted : 30 August 2011 08:11:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

ron hunter wrote:
Thanks for that Guru. Whilst the stats are a bit old, it's notable that stairs are second only to ladders w.r.t. falls. Presumably there are those who don't think that important either...............
For a start ladders are work equipment, stairwells are not. Did you actually read the report? It's notable that the majority of accidents on stairs happen in domestic properties. It's notable that the majority of accidents are deemed to be due to poor design of steps, poor maintenance and unfamiliarity with the steps. It's is also notable that the elderly are most susceptable to falls down stairs. The report actually reinforces what I said about the environment being the most important factor not the person on the stairs. Like Ray if someone asked me to put in stairway behaviour controls then I'm hanging up my hat and boots too.
Alan Haynes  
#24 Posted : 30 August 2011 09:15:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alan Haynes

RayRapp wrote:
......... God forbid I ever have to put in controls for people using stairways, I would hang up my hard hat tomorrow.
Whilst in 'general' agreement with Ray's comment, two things immediately spring to mind Firstly, there was some lengthy discussion some time ago on these forums about accidents on stairs involving people having their hands full [with trays of cups of tea] when using stairs and the accidents that had resulted Secondly, from personal experience a few years ago, when a member of staff slipped on the stairs and bounced down half a flight to the landing where he was found sitting somewhat dazed. He was relatively uninjured - backside and ego bruised, [mainly ego!] After the general office hilarity at his expense had subsided, several other people admitted that, over the last few years, they had also slipped on the stairs - but had been too embarrassed to admit it. Whilst we did not 'put controls in place', we did look at whether there were any reasons why the stairs were 'dangerous' [there weren't], and we did add a brief entry to the induction process and sent a general reminder to all staff [email] about the stairs So, whilst I agree that 'controls' may be a step too far [no pun intended] one shouldn't ignore what may be a real problem.
hilary  
#25 Posted : 30 August 2011 10:55:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
hilary

m, Do whatever you feel happiest with. If you dither and don't make a decision and someone does fall downstairs when wearing spiked heels and talking on the phone and carrying bags as happened in our place, you will be kicking yourself seven ways from next Sunday that you didn't do something. What about an all users email? It's official but not OTT. At the end of the day, you are responsible for identifying the risks and if your assessment tells you this is a risk then you cannot really ignore it, or there was no point in doing it in the first place.
A Kurdziel  
#26 Posted : 30 August 2011 11:10:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

I’d be careful with this one. We banned drinks and other liquids in open containers some years ago following an accident that cost of about £10000. We enforce this rule quite strongly and supply all staff with a lidded drinking cup so that they can take drinks back to their offices. On the other hand I too have heard of the multinational company that insists that staff hold onto hand rails while they walk and own steps. When I first heard of this I thought it was a wind up but apparently this company (a large chemical company) has this rule worldwide and enforces it. My suggestions that this would be the sort of thing that makes H&s look daft fell on deaf ears. On the other hand I do see people walking down and up stairs while texting on their phones and I have even been told of the person trying to use a laptop walking walking down some stairs. I suppose it all depends on your organisation’s culture and response to management initiatives. I think our staff are too cynical for this and we would have to put CCTV in every stairwell to enforce this sort of rule.
bod212  
#27 Posted : 30 August 2011 12:05:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bod212

My advice is this...ignore the negative comments made here. The fact that the people making the negative comments have never experienced many stair related accidents means that the issue has been well controlled or they are just very lucky. I wonder which it it could be? Stairs are everywhere, is there a workplace in the UK that doesn't have some kind of stair? If someone carrying out a work related task needs to use stairs then it should be factored into a risk assessment. I don't mean a specific risk assessment just for stair climbing. I mean that this is an inherent hazard and should be recorded as such. It is easy for someone who works in a low risk environment to lambast this as something that shouldn't even be thought about. I work in heavy industry. We risk assess accordingly. There are stairs for us to negotiate. They are included on our risk assessment. If we worked in, say, a large multi-storey office surely we would be encountering stairs more. Surely the chance of an accident is greater. Or am I missing something? Incidentally, when working in the nuclear industry a few years back they were very big on door closing (nuclear safety, you see) and as such everyone, and I mean everyone had to attend a course on the subject. On the surface it seemed laughable but it was a very real and potentially serious problem. I agree that an A5 poster might be too small and might go unnoticed. You can promote this issue without ramming it down the throats of people. Use anecdotal statistics/ evidence. Use bulletins via email. Use cartoons/ humour. Just don't treat the matter with the contempt that other 'professionals' have shown.
m  
#28 Posted : 30 August 2011 12:57:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

Once again, thanks for your comments. I knew the results would be spikey but I did not expect so much polarisation! I accept that the use of stairs is a low priority but the consequences can be high and sometimes people just need a reminder. I suppose that even negative discussion about this in the offices will get people thinking about the issues. I will take on the + and - views and may even submit some kind of link to what I come up with. I like the cartoon ideas, I thought of the swimming pool idea and then read it in a later post. I'll see what I can find in Word's ClipArt. I may even do an animation on YouTube but, of course, that won't make a poster.
Clairel  
#29 Posted : 30 August 2011 13:37:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Gerry D wrote:
My advice is this...ignore the negative comments made here. Just don't treat the matter with the contempt that other 'professionals' have shown.
Then again ignoring negative comments can be seen to be putting ones head in the sand, especially when those 'professionals' you refer to have considerable experience in H&S.
achrn  
#30 Posted : 30 August 2011 13:56:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

After milk bottles, stairs are our most frequent injury source. Two accident book entries in ten years for going up and down stairs. One of them was me. I always run up the stairs, and normally skip some treads in either direction. I don't think people need telling how to negotiate stairs in the safest possible manner, and I don't think it is necesary to always negotiate stairs in the safest possible manner - I have been known to ride a unicycle down (short) flights, though not at work. Has anyone quantitatively examined the dangers of running up stairs with the health benefit of frequent short-duration moderate-intensity exercise through the working day due to always running up the stairs?
Merv  
#31 Posted : 30 August 2011 14:37:50(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Merv

Kurdzy, (if I may be familiar) I did 25 years with that multinational chemical company - "no running", "use the handrail" rigidly enforced even by the contract cleaning ladies. having become thoroughly habituated (indoctrinated) twenty years since I I left them I still hold the handrail and haven't been known to run since I gave up squash. Anyway, at my age such rules seem more and more sensible. It's only the young and foolish that run up stairs. grumpgrumpgrump. Merv
DavidBrede  
#32 Posted : 30 August 2011 15:14:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DavidBrede

If you have a risk and there is evidence of accidents and near misses (or falls) then do a risk assessment that assesses and focuses on the issues in your building and offers good simple guidance which can fit into an induction or tool box talk for 5 minutes.
IanF  
#33 Posted : 30 August 2011 15:44:25(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
IanF

Couple of other points from accidents in my organisation: - clothing (I know footwear's been mentioned), but in my organisation, someone tripped on the end of a gown (in a court) and toppled down a flight; - cleaning standards (that is, cleaners leaving wet floors) - we've had some nasty injuries where floors have been left sopping wet - someone fractured their hip as a result (on a level, rather than falling down stairs). I'll leave others to debate the benefits of producing guidance, but hopefully these points will help.
Graham Bullough  
#34 Posted : 30 August 2011 16:02:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

When new postings appear on this forum there's no obvious way of predicting whether or not they will generate/provoke a lot of responses. In the case of this topic, a fair number of the responses seem to stem from whether or not the responders have experience of dealing with stairway-related accidents or not, or at least information about such accidents. Though I've dealt with relatively few such accidents I think that stairways, an unavoidable feature in many workplaces, have considerable potential for significant injury as regards HOW people use them. Therefore, I can't agree with Clairel's comment at #23 that environment is the most important factor, not the person on the stairs. Surely much of OS&H in its widest sense is concerned with the physical aspects of workplaces, buildings, machinery, etc., plus behavioural aspects, i.e. how people interact (wittingly or unwittingly) with the physical aspects. Take fork lift trucks for example. Good design and maintenance of such trucks is important, as is the design and layout of the workplaces and routes they use, and equally the training and behaviour of their operators. There's also a need to keep this matter in perspective. Stairways are so common that some people understandably think that safe use of them is a mundane topic, especially when compared with workplaces like nuclear power stations or North Sea oil platforms where activities and situations with potentially massive risks understandably and rightly get the most attention and resources to minimise such risks. Even so, it is appropriate for employers to try and influence how people use stairways, even though it surely is far from reasonably practicable to use observers or CCTV to identify stairway mis-users and tackle them. Ron Hunter at #8 makes a very valid point about stairways near external doorways becoming hazardous when their steps are made slippery by moisture being tracked in on footwear from outside during wet weather. Employers with such stairways ought to have dust/moisture trap mats/carpeting just inside the doorways so as to try and control the stair slip hazard by physical means as much as possible. However, such physical control can become ineffective in cases where the mats become saturated with moisture because lots of people use the stairways and/or the wet weather continues for a long time. Therefore, stairway users may well need to be told/reminded that stairways may become more slippery than usual during wet weather and thus merit extra care. For people like myself who tend to run up and down stairs, such extra care means not running at such times. Also, HSE might have an angle on stairway safety. While visiting a HSE office a few years ago I was intrigued to see an A4 size poster on a stairway I was using and took a photo, a somewhat mediocre one, of it, partly because I was still getting acquainted with a digital camera (one of my best tools for OS&H). The poster comprised a very simple cartoon with 4 figures running up/down 4 stairways interlinked in the style of the famous artist M C Escher, with a fifth figure shown plunging upside down from one of the stairways. Underneath was the advice "For your safety, please hold onto handrail". Perhaps the poster was devised locally because its heading was "Health and Safety Notice" which I thought was notably uninspiring. No doubt some forum users could think of alternative and inspiring headings. Finally for now, here's a suggestion as a development of this topic: Why don't those of us with school connections (professionally or as parents of school age kids) suggest to schools, especially primary schools, that they hold competitions for pupils to devise a poster about stair safety? The posters could include aspects which can make stairs unsafe and also how ways of tackling the hazards. It seems that some children are more perceptive about such matters than adults might expect. Also, the posters would provide an opportunity for teachers to conduct interactive discussions with their classes about stair safety. If such competitions resulted in a reasonable proportion of today's kids having some grasp of stairway safety, then perhaps in the long term there might be less need for employers to consider trying to influence employees and others about such a matter!
Clairel  
#35 Posted : 30 August 2011 17:10:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Graham, have you ever thought about reducing the length of your posts just a teensy bit - no offence but you do tend to waffle on a bit. H&S is such a dry subject anyway that sometimes two words really are better than 10. Lengthy posts are offputting, so maybe your point would get across better if it were more succinct. No offence intended mind.
Graham Bullough  
#36 Posted : 30 August 2011 18:13:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Clairel - thanks for your comments above - fair point about the length of some of my posts, so no offence perceived on my part. Sometimes I just get carried away about different points regarding some topics. Also, perhaps I'm heeding a semi-conscious desire to limit my tally of posts to avoid being classified as a super duper forum user! However, I can't agree about H&S being a "dry subject", and certainly not for regular forum participants who either work in H&S or have a significant interest in it. Part of the art/skill of working in H&S surely is making the subject interesting/relevant to others. This includes trying to understand how others perceive or misperceive it. I could also add... but won't !
pete48  
#37 Posted : 30 August 2011 18:31:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

I am going to leave my last words with Alice (Alice in Wonderland) as she fell into the rabbit hole she remarked. “Well! After this, I shall think nothing of fall-- of falling down stairs.” p48
barnaby  
#38 Posted : 30 August 2011 19:16:15(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Graham Bullough wrote:
Part of the art/skill of working in H&S surely is making the subject interesting/relevant to others.
Couldn't agree more mate!!!
Clairel  
#39 Posted : 30 August 2011 19:52:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Graham Bullough wrote:
However, I can't agree about H&S being a "dry subject", and certainly not for regular forum participants who either work in H&S or have a significant interest in it. Part of the art/skill of working in H&S surely is making the subject interesting/relevant to others. This includes trying to understand how others perceive or misperceive it. I could also add... but won't !
Well I'm a regular forum user and work in H&S and I think the subject is dry therefore how you deliver the subject is indeed very important......hence me telling you to stop waffling!! ;-) I make it my mission to talk to clients in plain English and make it real and not spout about legislation etc It's suprising how many people who work in H&S do think the subject is a tad boring. We're not all H&S geeks even if we make our careers from it. Thanks by the way, my constructive criticism was well taken by yourself!!
RayRapp  
#40 Posted : 30 August 2011 21:21:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

For what it's worth I'm firmly with Claire with this one. Health and safety has a very poor image (and it's a dry subject for most) and I see my role as a practitioner to try and engage people to work safely most of the time. I, strangely enough, tend to focus on significant risks - the ones which might kill people. I also accept that if a perceived trivial risk is the main cause of injuries at work, then it is incumbent upon that person to manage it as they see fit. People talking on the phone, texting, using a laptop, carrying a tray of drinks...do not need training or advice in how to use the stairs. They know better but are happy not to use a handrail. Just as people know when they are driving a vehicle they should not use a phone, text, use their sat nav...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.