Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
gordon j  
#1 Posted : 19 October 2011 12:01:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
gordon j

Hi all

Does anyone know if there is a minimum qualification requirement in order to be authorised to perform a basic fire risk assessment on premises. The premises would not be categorised as high risk and would be offices and shops predominantly. I have spoken with the local fire service reference this and belive it or not they couldnt really give me definitive guidance.

Your views greatly appreciated as always

Gordon J
JohnW  
#2 Posted : 19 October 2011 13:43:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JohnW

gordon,

Yes I suppose there isn't definitive guidance; depends on the premises and the risks.

A previous thread on the forum pointed to a discussion document issued by FIA, draft ‘Competency Criteria for Fire Risk Assessors’ .

http://www.fia.uk.com/fi...y_document_-_15_6_11.pdf

If the link is broken find a route to it here:

http://www.fia.uk.com/en...k-assessment-council.cfm

and put 'competency' in the search box

gordon j  
#3 Posted : 19 October 2011 14:31:50(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
gordon j

Thanks JohnW

Very helpful info

gordon j
stephenjs  
#4 Posted : 20 October 2011 12:05:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
stephenjs

Hi Gordon,

I would go with Nebosh Fire \cert + 3 years experience in Fire procedures, systems, training & risk assessments

The Fire bodies are moving towards the Nebosh Fire Cert as a base qualification as its NVQ L3

regards Stephen
gordon j  
#5 Posted : 20 October 2011 12:49:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
gordon j

Hi Stephen

Thanks for the info on course...looking up reputable training organisations now

gordon j
Dave Rees  
#6 Posted : 24 October 2011 16:55:07(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Dave Rees

We use the British Safety Council Level 2 qualification in Fire Risk Assessment and have become an approved organisation so deliver the course internally. You need to attend the training and then complete a work assessment after which the BSC marks. So it proves competance through assessment. Of course expeiance also needs to be had. Our guys who do the course then have around 8 buildings under there control to assess.
bob youel  
#7 Posted : 28 October 2011 10:45:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

There is no minimum qualification nor indeed any sort of qualification that is spelt out that is a legal requirement that I know of but competence is quoted

As an example; every school in the UK should undertake a fire risk assessment and after looking at hundreds of these school fire risk assessments I find that on many many occasions they are undertaken by the person given the task [anything from the head teacher to their admin manager, to the care taker etc.] and in most cases they have no experience nor training; this is a stupid situation but there it is

It is only when we have problems/a fire etc. that such risk assessments are seen for what they are

Best of luck on chosing your course
Gamble39201  
#8 Posted : 02 November 2011 09:29:13(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Gamble39201

Surrey County Council , just won the IOSH Safety Award for Education and LA ( I'm not bitter :-) ) for the work they did on training 100,s of school staff to become fire risk assessors in partnership with the Fire Service, FPA have I believe developed the course which is available on DVD .. ??
Try http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/
jarsmith83  
#9 Posted : 04 November 2011 18:39:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jarsmith83

Can I just add my 2 pennies -

The RRFSO 2005 states:

(5) A person is to be regarded as competent for the purposes of this article where he has sufficient training and experience or knowledge and other qualities to enable him properly to assist in undertaking the preventive and protective measures.

Its very fluffy at the moment in terms of guidance on this subject. You would just have to demonstrate you have taken the above into consideration. I am a very methodical person. When I first complete the NEBOSH Fire Safety and Risk Management Cert, because I was lacking in experience, I followed a very in depth study book used to study for the course, and every decision I made when Risk Assessing the premises was detailed. This was to demonstrate why I had come to the decisions I had in the RIsk Assessment. Over time I have gained experience, and know could pretty much complete a FRA without the requirement of constant referring to my books but, I will always need to make reference to some sort of book because of the complexity of FRA`s in general.


That draft document is brilliant!


I also compile my companies polices, this will help hugely when discussing draft polices I have compiled, thanks JohnW.
gourock  
#10 Posted : 05 November 2011 11:44:53(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
gourock

Good morning all,

I am just commencing my CPD and needed the info above. Thank you all for an informative discussion.

Cheers, Ron
Paul T  
#11 Posted : 16 May 2012 19:07:38(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Paul T

Hello i came across this thread i would like to make a comment.The NEBOSH Fire cert is a very good start but is not enough to be able to say you have the competence to carry out a FRA, i have the fire cert at Dist to gain competence you can enrol on the Vulcan Fire Managers course it consists of Mod 1 and Mod 2. If you have the Nebosh fire you only have to take Mod 1, i have just passed it, i would highly recommend it Graham the tutor is highly knowledgeable. you can then apply for Tech-IFSM and carry out FRA.

http://www.vulcanfiretra.../course_fire_Manager.php
Graham Holloway

BA(Open), FIFSM, MIFPO, MIFireE, MIIRSM

Hope this helps


Wilcock28253  
#12 Posted : 08 June 2012 14:50:58(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Wilcock28253

Afternoon all,
This may be slightly off topic but the company i work for are considering the employment of a fire risk assessor specialist who could also carry out fire and safety audits for complex commercial buildings and high rise residential buildings.
Could anyone who may have an interest PM me please
Andrew W Walker  
#13 Posted : 12 June 2012 09:30:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

Paul T wrote:
Hello i came across this thread i would like to make a comment.The NEBOSH Fire cert is a very good start but is not enough to be able to say you have the competence to carry out a FRA, i have the fire cert at Dist to gain competence you can enrol on the Vulcan Fire Managers course it consists of Mod 1 and Mod 2. If you have the Nebosh fire you only have to take Mod 1, i have just passed it, i would highly recommend it Graham the tutor is highly knowledgeable. you can then apply for Tech-IFSM and carry out FRA.

http://www.vulcanfiretra.../course_fire_Manager.php
Graham Holloway

BA(Open), FIFSM, MIFPO, MIFireE, MIIRSM

Hope this helps




I have just done Module 1 of this course and found it to be very worthwhile. I would highly recommend it.

Andy
waterside999  
#14 Posted : 12 June 2012 15:05:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
waterside999

With any risk assessment you should be competent to carry out the assessment. Competency is a bit of a grey area but essentially means someone with the appropriate information, training and other qualities to carry out the assessment. A fire risk assessment follows this principle.

For a low risk premises I would suggest the risk assessment template contained on the back of the fire risk assessment guides would be acceptable. Once you start moving to more complex buildings (e.g. basements, storeys, fire engineered solutions) then formal qualifications along with experience are required.

However in my experience it amazes me that a number of persons who carry out fire risk assessment in their own most basic of buildings are blind to certain issues as they work day in day out in the same building and fail to notice problems. In those situations it is preferable that a fresh pair of eyes either does, or reviews the assessment.
bob youel  
#15 Posted : 22 June 2012 14:13:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Of the many that I have looked at which have been undertaken by 'retired professionals' I find that most are very poor
Fosterspanner321  
#16 Posted : 29 June 2012 14:45:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Fosterspanner321

Hi All,

I deal with 5 different brigades across my role and there is a huge disparity between each none ever checked my competence they are all only concerned whether the FRA is suitable and sufficient. Two brigades didn't even bother to read it when they inspected, two were happy and one issued us with an Improvement notice all off the same format FRA so i wouldn't worry about competence just content.

Regards
Andrew.Kelly  
#17 Posted : 02 July 2012 16:14:26(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Andrew.Kelly

I agree with the people who are saying that the Nebosh Fire Cert is not enough. When we had an issue with our (now ex) fire assessor and sought advice from the LFB, they said that they would expect a fire assessor to:
- Have done a separate course such as the Vulcan or FPS fire assessor course in the specific competency area (Life Safety OR Property Protection), AND
- Be a member of a professional fire assessor register such as the Institute of Fire Engineers.

I echo Bob in that many retired professionals, i.e. ex-firemen, can be very poor as they are not necessarily trained in fire risk assessment!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.