Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Roundtuit  
#1 Posted : 27 March 2020 20:16:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

So as we are all aware there are some supply chain problems acquiring sufficient PPE - we now have the potential that some equipment may now reach our shores not necessarily CE marked nor tested to European Standards

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/opss-coronavirus-covid-19-guidance-for-business-and-local-authorities 

HM Gov has written to both the Notified Bodies who conduct testing and the HSE who enforce market surveillance asking them to consider suitability for the task rather than absolute conformity.

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
Kate on 30/03/2020(UTC), Kate on 30/03/2020(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#2 Posted : 27 March 2020 20:16:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

So as we are all aware there are some supply chain problems acquiring sufficient PPE - we now have the potential that some equipment may now reach our shores not necessarily CE marked nor tested to European Standards

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/opss-coronavirus-covid-19-guidance-for-business-and-local-authorities 

HM Gov has written to both the Notified Bodies who conduct testing and the HSE who enforce market surveillance asking them to consider suitability for the task rather than absolute conformity.

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
Kate on 30/03/2020(UTC), Kate on 30/03/2020(UTC)
chris.packham  
#3 Posted : 28 March 2020 10:06:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

When considering the selection and use of gloves as protection conformity does not necessarily indicate fitness for the task for which it is being provided. For example, the EN ISO standard for gloves for chemical protection (EN ISO 347) actually states that the standard does not indicate suitability for a specific situation. 

I wonder how the HSE is  going to assess suitability for the task as opposed to CE conformity.

peter gotch  
#4 Posted : 28 March 2020 10:28:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Roundtuit - right on the ball! Thanks for sharing the link.

Chris - I suspect that HSE don't know, and I wonder what projects the sharply pared resources in the Health and Safety Laboratory would be expected to drop to do as asked.

P

thanks 1 user thanked peter gotch for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 07/04/2020(UTC)
A Kurdziel  
#5 Posted : 07 April 2020 09:58:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

This government (most governments) want to have their cake and eat: they want guarantees of safety but they don’t want to be “held back by red tape”. It’s called squaring a circle and you just can’t do it! So they are going to have to choose: keep CE marking which may cases delays and short supplies or cross fingers and have a free for all. Well they all desperately want to be elected and now they have to start making decisions and live with the consequences.

Users browsing this topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.