Rank: Super forum user 
|
|
 1 user thanked WatsonD for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
Because it is not adequately maintained. Its 19 years since REACH and 17 since CLP which introduced Hazard (H) and Precautionary (P) Statements. The e-tool harks back to the defunct Risk (R) and Safety (S) phrases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Because it is not adequately maintained. Its 19 years since REACH and 17 since CLP which introduced Hazard (H) and Precautionary (P) Statements. The e-tool harks back to the defunct Risk (R) and Safety (S) phrases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user 
|
that was the first hit on google...more likely cost of maintainance is the driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: Roundtuit  Because it is not adequately maintained. Its 19 years since REACH and 17 since CLP which introduced Hazard (H) and Precautionary (P) Statements. The e-tool harks back to the defunct Risk (R) and Safety (S) phrases.
That sound more like a reason to update it rather than discontinue, but I guess it all smacks of cost cutting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It does indeed sound like cost cutting. With a new Government looking even keener to "cut red tape" than the last one, perhaps HSE is also gearing up for radical change to COSHH etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.