Rank: Super forum user
|
The OP only asked if it was a RIDDOR... :-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I was losing the will to live... reading it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
I think people are confused here, the first issue - is it a reportable Riddor? , yes it is. It is the employers responsibility to look after health and welfare of employee. She has been injured at work, over 7 day injury - reportable.
Second issue surrounds the gritting. It is the responsibility of the landlord to have the surface treated in inclement weather a claim would be against the landlord./
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Originally Posted by: MaxL  I think people are confused here, the first issue - is it a reportable Riddor? , yes it is. It is the employers responsibility to look after health and welfare of employee. She has been injured at work, over 7 day injury - reportable.
Second issue surrounds the gritting. It is the responsibility of the landlord to have the surface treated in inclement weather a claim would be against the landlord./
Do you? I don't think people are confused.
I think they're debating
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: MaxL  I think people are confused here, the first issue - is it a reportable Riddor? , yes it is. It is the employers responsibility to look after health and welfare of employee. She has been injured at work, over 7 day injury - reportable.
Second issue surrounds the gritting. It is the responsibility of the landlord to have the surface treated in inclement weather a claim would be against the landlord./
Being injured at work is a red herring in the reporting of RIDDOR. Just because you are at work doesn't make it reportable. Why I am getting involved in RIDDOR questions is beyond me.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Everything depends on the lease agreement. If the maintenance of the path is indeed the Landlords responsibility (including gritting), then your employee is a member of the public to him and so unless she went straight to hospital (which she didn’t) it is not reportable.
If gritting the paths is either not noted (so landlord has not specifically taken responsibility) or definitely your responsibility and this person was walking between the two building for a work required activity (ie not at lunch or break). Then it is associated with their work and so reportable by your company. IMHO having to move from one building you control to another you control on a path you control because they, let’s say have to take a message to someone or go and liaise with someone, is work, otherwise why wold they be doing it. If the company requires them to do whatever it is, then it is work.
So up to you which fits best to your circumstance.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.