Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 April 2009 15:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andy.c.
Opinions, clarification please,

IP has minor accident on Wednesday, stays at work until end of working day. Reports in sick on the Thursday stating accident from previous day for absence, has rest days Friday and Saturday and returns to work on the Sunday.

Not counting the day of accident but including rest days this is a three day absence and therefore automatically reportable, but if the IP during a back to work interview implies they only needed a day to rest and had it not been a rest day (Friday)would have attended work, should i still report

Regards
Andy
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 April 2009 15:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steven n
If they were fit for work during their rest days it is not reportable.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 April 2009 15:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Duell
Agree with Steven N: It's not whether they were AT work, it's whether they were FIT to work.

Otherwise, every accident including cuts and bruises, on the day before you go on a fortnight's holiday, would be reportable!
Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 April 2009 15:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Clive Lowery
Hi Andy,

I would say no. The important fact is that the IP was available for work.

However; that said I would record all the details and keep a note in their file, ensuring they signed a statemnt to that effect as well.

Regards

Clive
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 April 2009 15:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andy.c.
Thanks for the quick response, Glad i asked the question at the BTWI, i was not sure but thought as much, "extended weekend syndrome" surely not a notifiable disease

regards
Andy
Admin  
#6 Posted : 22 April 2009 15:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft
Don'T disagree with the others but in any case not reportable as must be OVER 3 days not fit for normal duties and not simply 3 days, not counting day of accident to be reportable unless it was a specified injury etc.
R
Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 April 2009 15:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By safetyamateur
Even without the 'Friday' issue, this is a two-day absence, right? (exclude day of incident, Friday & Saturday absent, work on Sunday = 2 days)
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 April 2009 15:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By safetyamateur
Why don't I read these things properly? Ignored the Thursday. Doh!

Carry on

Admin  
#9 Posted : 22 April 2009 15:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By andy.c.
Safetyamateur

Off absent Thursday, rest days Fri, Sat. made me check the post though

Regards

Andy
Admin  
#10 Posted : 22 April 2009 17:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By anon1234
Richard Altoft is correct - it is NOT reportable as the IP was only absent for a maximum of 3 days not including the day of the accident - hence it is not an OVER 3 day RIDDOR.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 22 April 2009 20:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose
Others have beaten me to it - it's not a 3 day injury that is reportable it's an OVER 3 day injury. Also remember that it is not just limited to injury's which result in people being off work for more than 3 days but also those injury's that mean that people are unable to perform their NORMAL work duties for more than 3 consecutive days.

Paul D - "every accident including cuts and bruises, on the day before you go on a fortnight's holiday, would be reportable" - they may well be recordable, but not necessarily reportable under RIDDOR.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 23 April 2009 07:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F
Paul D,

they would have to state that the accident was the reason they were off i.e. cut finger and as it would be over the stat, 7 days produce a doctors note.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 23 April 2009 08:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Biggles473
I wonder then why we persist with the "3 day" comments. It's always baffled me as it's got to be 4 days minimum...who thought this up in the first place...HSE?

Surely we should be calling it a 4 day or more injury / absence.

Just a thought.

Mark
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.