Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 May 2009 16:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MICHAEL T
We have some sub-con pipe-fitters who have removed pipework and ground off the old gaskets which have now tested as white asbestos.
Looking at the RIDDOR ACoP:
Escape of substances (paragraph 21)
The accidental release or escape of any substance in a quantity sufficient to cause the death, major injury or any other damage to the health of any person.
150 The substances covered by this definition may be in any form: liquid, solid (eg powder), gaseous or vapour and may include, for example:
(a) substances which may be hazardous to health (eg asbestos).
I take this to apply in this case? - does it??
Who should put the F2508 in, us or the sub-con company?
What liability does the client have for not disclosing the presence of ACM's?
Regards
Mike
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 May 2009 18:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
I suspect that the HSE will also pick this up when reported as a failure under CAR 2006. It is all too easy in maintenance type work to gnore the problem of asbestos. You were breaking open a flange with material inserted that a competent person copuld reasonably believe was an ACM. The regulation 4 duty holder therefore has the duty to manage ACMs, assess work, and ensure adequate training. This is the very scenario that the HSE are trying very hard to eliminate.

Bob
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 May 2009 20:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
Yes, as no mimimum safe level established for Asbestos, technically reportable.
HSE won't fuss who reports as both parties are in breach!
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 May 2009 20:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TonyB
Michael

Yes it is reportable.

As mentioned the HSE won't be that bothered who reports but technically the duty falls to your organisation as the "Reasonable Person" due to this being a Dangerous Occurrence and you constitute the controller of premises. (para 25 of the RIDDOR ACoP - Table 1).

This is one area that common misunderstood with regards to RIDDOR. It's the site who must report DOs that result from contractor's activities - not the contractor!

Hope it helps

TonyB

Admin  
#5 Posted : 10 May 2009 08:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.