Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 May 2009 19:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Messy Shaw
I keep reading (on various threads and on many fire consultant websites) that fire risk assessments need to be conducted by 'competent persons'.

Whilst I have no problem with that view - indeed I totally support that aspiration- where does it say that in the RR(FS)O 2005????

There is multiple use of the term competent person throughout the RR(FS)O and a useful definition. But I cannot see where it relates to conducting a FRA.

The only possible article is Article 18 (safety assistance) where it states:-

"18. —(1) The responsible person must, subject to paragraphs (6) and (7), appoint one or more competent persons to assist him in undertaking the preventive and protective measures."

However, this must surely relate to a time after the FRA has been completed, as only a FRA is able to determine those 'preventive and protective measures'.

Any views?????

Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 May 2009 19:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TDsafety
I think you'll find that anybody who completes any type of RA should be, in some way, competent.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 May 2009 20:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer
Carrying out a FRA is all part of the process in highlighting and undertaking preventative and protective measures. Paragraph 6 and 7 are the exemptions from Article 18 of the Order.

If you have a small office 1 or 2 storey, you may have vast experience of that property and knowledge. You can use the official guidance publications to assist you in carrying out the FRA. You also have HSE websites and other BS documents to assist you. Attending a training course will aid you.

'sufficient training and experience or knowledge and other qualities to enable him/her properly to assist in undertaking the preventive and protective measures'.


So yes you do need to be competent, but the environment of your workplace will dictate (and the insurance guys) to what level of competence will be required.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 May 2009 20:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft
Article 9 says responsible person must undertake FRA, and RP alone is responsible for FRA being suitable and sufficient so if RP has assistance then it had better be from someone competent or RP will be liable.Remember who the RP is has been defined in RRFSO so it is not a question of someone being delegated to be RP as RP will remain as defined in RRFSO Article 3 throughout. Hence very unlikely a safety pro would be the RP for example
R
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 May 2009 10:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer
In short yes you need to be comp[etent. That is to understand the whol;e process and be able to reach a sound judgement of the level of risk to which anyone in the workplace can be exposed. That does not mean you must employ a company to do it. That is a myth driven by the commercial interest of such companies. Take for instance a small office on one floor with a suitable emergency exit within the required disyance leading the safe asembly point, the risk would be low provided the premises is adequately managed, it may burn down but no one will get killed. Isn't that the main point of the RRRFSO?
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 May 2009 10:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel
would any professional facilitate in the RA process irrespective of the subject area if they were not competent do so so - If they would then, in my opinion, they are not working as a professional

This is not to say that none competent people do nothing it says that they gain competence by buddying those who do have the appropriate skills and learning about subjects in as many ways as they can do
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 May 2009 11:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Swis
competence is a MUST. Not only in FRA but i any other RAs.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 20 May 2009 13:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike DF
To turn the question on its head; would you let an incompetent person do your FRA? I think not.

I guess the question is really look to define competence. With a good H&S background and experience you should be able to interpret the regs and do an assessment - or know that you don't feel competent to do so.

Look out for the next post 2006 fire fatality to bring forward a court case and provide us with some clarity
Admin  
#9 Posted : 20 May 2009 13:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Y
The simple answer is 'yes' of course they have to be. Mike makes the simple point, would you let someone that isn't competent do it? What confidence would you have in any assessment that wasn't done bu someone that was competent to do it. The assessment would probably not stand up to scrutiny but more importantly would not identify and manage the risks that it needed to.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.