Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 19 May 2009 11:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
http://www.telegraph.co....on-Armed-Forces-Day.html

Just for once it would be nice to know exactly who advises on H&S to this council. Or at least their qualifications

Any offers ?

Merv
Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 May 2009 11:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F
Merv,

I would like to respond but there seems little point.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 19 May 2009 11:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Scotty
I was interested in this section:

"South Kesteven District Council, which maintains the Town Hall, says it is too risky to ask the site manager to climb a ladder and unfurl a flag."

Why is it too risky to ask the manager? Are they some sort of brute? Likely to fly off the handle at any request?

Or is it just poor grammer, split infinitives or shoddy journalism?

Oh, sometimes I think the world gets dimmer by the day. And it's only Tuesday. *sob*
Admin  
#4 Posted : 19 May 2009 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
Probably not yet attended the £250.00 ++ course Mr Letts attended during his filming of his recent programme!!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 May 2009 11:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MartB
Up the pole !!!

WAH Risk assessment & plan etc; by competent persons.

ATB
Martb

Admin  
#6 Posted : 19 May 2009 12:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin Brown
Check out the Mail. Looking at the photo in their report it looks a bit iffy (is the flagpole inclined outwards, where is the ladder to be sited/secured) to me but there are other ways around the problem, including a cherry picker. Obviously a case of money talks, flagflying walks.

http://www.dailymail.co....lag-Queens-birthday.html
Admin  
#7 Posted : 19 May 2009 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Flic
This is a most peculiar situation. You don't normally have to climb to the top of a flag pole in order to put a flag on it. There is usually a piece of rope and a pulley for doing the job.

Flic
Admin  
#8 Posted : 19 May 2009 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graham Bullough
Merv

Thanks for flagging up (!) the press article about access to the flagpole on the roof of Bourne Town Hall in Lincolnshire being banned because of "elf n safety". However, by your questions, it seems that you've fallen into the trap of assuming that the ban has come from a H&S adviser. Most if not all of the silly "elf n safety" scenarios in local authorities which get publicised seem to stem from managers who use "elf n safety" as a spurious reason to try and justify decisions they've made about banning activities for other reasons.

I've no connection with South Kesteven District Council but guess, probably like most others reading this thread, that the council's H&S professionals have not been involved. I know of another council which had a silly "elf n safety" situation at its town hall which was rightly highlighted by a press article several years ago. When I later met one of its advisers and the story cropped up in conversation, she told me that reading the press article was how she and her colleagues first became aware of the situation.


Admin  
#9 Posted : 19 May 2009 13:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
Graham,

Thank You. That was exactly my point. As others have already pointed out, if a minimum Risk Analysis had been done by someone even minimally competent then alternative methods would/should have been suggested.

We are not here to ban things. We are here to help facilitate them. Safely.

Merv
Admin  
#10 Posted : 19 May 2009 18:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graham Bullough
Merv

As a regular reader of your contributions on this forum I should have twigged that you were being teasingly provocative about this matter. Anyhow, I fully agree with your sentiments about real health and safety being about enabling, facilitating and protecting, not banning.

The photo on the Mail website is most useful. The base of the pole appears to be accessible from the top of the steps behind it, so perhaps the rope on the pole got stolen. I bet most people on this forum who looked at the photo shouted "cherry picker" or "MEWP" when they saw it, and probably thought of at least one other safe way of of dealing with the matter. Crikey, better not ask if and how the pole gets painted or the face of the clock high up on the Town Hall facade gets cleaned!

Is it too much to hope that the matter will be resolved by the next time a flag should be displayed from the pole?

If a VIP such as a member of the Royal Family were due to visit Bourne at short notice, no doubt the matter would get resolved in a flash. As an aside, several past experiences prompt me to mention that impending royal visits work wonders in getting organisations to find funds and decide to repair, clean and redecorate the buildings to be visited. Rumour had it that after a visit by Princess Anne to a large educational establishment in my area some years ago, the route she followed inside the establishment could be readily identified by seeing which corridors and rooms were clean and newly decorated compared with the off-route parts.

Cheers

Graham
Admin  
#11 Posted : 20 May 2009 13:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By marcusblack
It is so frustrating that we never see the real story. If just one of these national papers fully exercised their journalistic capabilities. A full report into the story would lead to less 'elf & safety' nonsense and more appropriate ridicule of these cowardly figures hiding behind an essential service.
Come on journalists, do a worthwhile job for a change!
Mark
Admin  
#12 Posted : 20 May 2009 19:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graham Bullough
It's good to report that, according to a press article at

http://www.peterborought...urn-on-flying.5286664.jp

there has been a u-turn about the flagpole, although it doesn't seem to mention the method by which the matter is to be resolved. Any bets on the use of a cherry picker as the most likely one?

Also, this thread is currently listed as about the 4th hit when you do an internet search under Bourne + flagpole.

On a general note, most hijackings of "elf n safety" by people who are not H&S experts as an excuse for banning things tend to identify themselves because the people involved use the easy blanket term "health and safety". Surely most situations can be classed under either "safety" or "health" but not both at the same time! Concerns about "safety" may have been claimed (but not justified) as the basis for the flagpole scenario, but it had nothing to do with "health".
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.