Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 May 2009 09:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Trevor Anstey
Morning
We have a new piece of ECD equipment used for the testing of RoHS substances.
It contains a sealed source of Nickel-63 Beta radiation & the service procedures from the suppliers state that a leak test is required to be taken every six months by the user.

Does anyone have any experience with this? our engineers wish to use an old piece of uncalibrated victoreen equipment which in my opinion is not suitable.

The equipment suppliers are not being particularly helpful & I would appreciate some advice
Im thinking a simple wipe down test would suffice?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 May 2009 09:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft
Trevor, cant help but I do like to learn from such postings. My Experience of radioactive sources differs from this one. Can you explain the abbreviations please.
R
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 May 2009 10:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Flic
A Google search suggests that this is an Electron Capture Detector.

I think you need to establish just what is intended - for some equipment a leak test means a check of whether the shielding is doing its job in blocking the radiation, and consists of running a geiger counter of the right type all around the equipment, looking for airborne emissions.

On the other hand, for radioactive substances, there is a need for periodic checking that they are not leaking out of their sealed containers. This would normally be done by doing a wipe test and check with geiger counter. Here you are looking for radioactive material that is escaping from the container.

The two tests are fundamentally different.

I suggest you consult a radiation protection adviser to help you to figure out what is needed. In any event, using uncalibrated equipment to do it is definitely out.

Flic
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 May 2009 12:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
Flic: this radiation is not "airborne".
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 May 2009 12:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Flic
Perhaps I chose the wrong word there, but I was trying to help people distinguish between the two tests. A wipe test will not find a beta particle.

If you have a beta emitter, the beta particles are indeed airborne - they travel through the air from the source to you. It isn't electromagnetic radiation, it is a flux of real particles.

Flic
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.