IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Incident Review Committees / panels - How Effective
Rank: New forum user
|
I'm looking to get some indsight / feedback from any members whose organisations utilise panels or committees to review incidents.
I work for a multi-national, in the extractive industires, working in developing nations and the UK. We're looking at ways to reduce repeat incidents -especially ones were the controls for hazards are generally well known.
For several years there has been an Incident Review Panel made up pf technical managers and HSE managers, who meet monthly and discuss recent incidents - sometimes asking the operating unit to dial in and join the discussion. The oput put of the meeting is the IRP report that is a brief summary of some recent incident - and a set of suggestions (note, NOT mandatory actions) for Country Managers to consider.
I don't believe it's working particularly effectively - as hwn I audit different countries I find the same issues time and time again - but I'm wondering if any members also have similar committees / panels? How do they work? Who sits on them? What's their output? Are they effective?
I'm really trying to upgrade our process and would like to hear fro / talk to others to benchmark what we do. I'll be happy to share all of our processes.
Al.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sounds like you don't have action points agreed upon and only suggestions?
How are the senior managers held accountable under the company rules to ensure that any agreed points are actioned in a timely manner and followed up?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Somewhere the process does not have an effective method of circulating all reports to all units globally
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Al
As MB1 indicated earlier and IMHO:
Your problems lie with the open-endedness of the IRP report; as you have stated that “suggestions (note, Not mandatory actions) for Country managers to consider”.
So people being people they probably leave the meetings with the best intentions, but soon get back to dealing with things they have to do; suggestions then get pushed to back of the mind and are soon forgotten.
IMHO if you wish any type of meeting to achieve a desired outcome, then you need to at least agree/state or dictate/delegate what needs to be done, by whom and by when before closing the meeting. Then check that actions are being effectively completed in a timely fashion; a quick thanks or pat on the back for timely and thorough completion and a gentle nudge (or kick) as applicable for not hitting deadlines.
If you have similar accidents occurring across different sites/countries then perhaps you need to focus on company wide solutions to avoid repeat occurrences as much as possible. If this is not an option or applicable then break it down into manageable sized chunks i.e. for sites/countries (as applicable).
And as bob has stated; you also need to ensure that you have an effective means of distributing reports to all concerned.
HTH
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Smith, MB1, Bob,
Thanks for the inputs - your all correct on all accoutns. There isn't great accountability.
Part of the issue at the moment is that there is a lot of (too much?) belief that if you fire off ane actions points to everyone, then everyone will take action.
I'd really like to be able to demonstrate to my leadership team what a good i.e. effective process would look like.
Would any of tyou be willing to discuss your set-ups / share processes in more detail/offline?
I'm happy to do likewise, but really see this as a sticking point for reducing injuires across our organisation.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Incident Review Committees / panels - How Effective
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.