Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Ken Slack  
#1 Posted : 01 March 2011 10:56:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ken Slack

Just perusing H&S news and found this, is this the kind of thing that Lord Young was trying to address, are LCC right, or should they implement the necessary H&S to make the volunteers safe, rather than a blankey 'NO'.... http://news.bbc.co.uk/lo...wsid_9397000/9397970.stm
SteveL  
#2 Posted : 01 March 2011 11:02:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SteveL

I thought H&S was about getting things done in a safe manner, not stopping things being done, it would not take a lot to implement the required H&S,and would be a benefit to all. No wonder safety has a bad name.
HSSnail  
#3 Posted : 01 March 2011 11:22:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Steve l - "It would not take a lot to implement the required H&S" Are you familiar with the property Steve? For me the picture shows a very large property which it states has stood empty for 15 years. This potential means that there could be a minefield of issues - rotting floor boards, asbestos, material left by persons using the premises illegally such as used hyperdermic needles etc. I agree that it is a real shame that the Authority cannot assess the work properly and adequately supervise the volunteers so that the improvements can be made, but with the number of job losses and cut backs being announced each day I can understand why they feel unable to tackle this issue at this time. Brian
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 01 March 2011 11:40:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Let's keep the correct perspective here. This is a Grade II listed Building. You cannot let well-meaning volunteers loose to make inappropriate repairs etc.Prioritising, planning and approving those works takes an awful lot of resources. Times are hard and LAs have some difficult choices to make. We can only hope that funds will allow the building to be kept wind and water-tight until a buyer can be found.
walker  
#5 Posted : 01 March 2011 12:13:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

I think Ron has hit the nail on the head. This fine building will remain delapidated until vandals burn it down & then the council can sell the plot & wash their hands of it.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.