Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 19 July 2001 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith Hutchings July 19, 2001 I was wondering what is happening in other jurisdictions related to whether any consideration is been given to legislating a ban on cell use while driving? Are companies putting in place policy as part or their OH&S policies to regulate how cell phone should be used by staff? What are other issues related to this topic which affect an OH&S Program? Thanks for your response!
Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 July 2001 12:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor The three main areas of concern tend to be: distraction and loss control of the vehicle or other associated accidents; possible health effects from continued use; and radio interference with equipment and systems. We address these through a simple generic risk assesment. I know that some others have introduced policies and/or rules.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 19 July 2001 15:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin The organisation I work in has introduced a policy on mobile phones in general. It emphasises the managers responsibilities to assess and enforce best practice in order to minimise any risks, and gives guidance based on current knowledge and common sense. Some of these are: minimising use of mobiles, use of land lines where possible, minimising call length, areas where phones must not be used (eg garage forecourts), not giving the number out unless there is no landline alternative etc. In terms of driving, we say that all employees must follow the highway code and excercise proper control of vehicles at all times, therefore the policy states that mobile phones should not be dialled or answered while the vehicle is in motion, hands free kit or not.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 19 July 2001 17:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Francis MSc MIOSH RSP Martin, Brilliant is all I can say- the more who think and act this way the better. Any chance of getting hold of your actual Policy on this? Have you included radios in cabs too?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 July 2001 19:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Harper Being relativly new to H&S (5 Years) I am puzzled with certain questions such as this, hopefully some of the more experinced can enlighten me. The issue is a simple one. You use a phone, the police are likley to prosecute you for "Undue care and attention", hands free or not. OK, so you guys are out writing policy that some has to read and someone has to enforce for something that you can reasonably expect everyone with a driving licence to know. You may already have in you Health & Safety policy, compliance with the law and perhaps even mentioned the Road Traffic Act. I spend a lot of time on issues such as this and to me it seems very simple, in my H&S policy, which I am now reviewing...."Mobile phones or cab radio must not be used whilst driving" Am I missing something?
Admin  
#6 Posted : 19 July 2001 21:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Burt If this is the most pressing Health & Safety issue that you have in your organisation you must share the secret of your success with everyone. I express this view as a person who is still trying to get things like risk assessments, site specific method statements and proper accident investigations completed by Managers. I have only been trying to achieve this over a period of over 20 years in the health, safety and environmental field. Perhaps I have just missed the point.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 July 2001 09:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ciaran McAleenan I would have to agree with the tenor of Ian and David's postings. This is not strictly a OSH issue. There are perhaps health issues that are still the subject of debate. I was asked to produce a policy for an organisation recently which I resisted. Eventually I wrote the following note to be sent to all department heads for circulation to their staff. Some of the references are N. Ireland or UK specific but the sense was intended to be global. Hope you find it useful. Ciaran mailto:ciaran@confinedspaces.com
COMPANY MEMO
It has been the 's position, since the implementation of our safety management system, not to duplicate advice that already exists. Since there is already a significant amount of advice and guidance already in the public domain will not be issuing a policy document on this topic. However pointers to the existing sources of advice are offered below, together with an explanation of how the guidance should be used in the completion of 'site specific' assessments. Mobile Phone Sources of Advice 1. There is sufficient guidance on the safe use hands free mobile phones (HFMP), including advice on the correct type of car kit, available in the manufacturer’s guidance. Compliance with the Safety Manual procedure (Purchasing and Disposal Policy) will adequately address that issue. 2. The use of hand-held mobile phones (HHMP) while driving is not permitted under the Highway Code. The legislation, giving rise to the offence, is Articles 10 & 12 of the Road Traffic (NI) Order 1995. 3. The Highway Code is a control measure in the generic risk assessments (Core Tasks; ‘Travel to and from site’ and ‘Working on or near the highway/ railway’). Whenever individual managers are making or reviewing their ‘site specific’ assessments they should highlight Highway Code Para. 127 to staff using mobile phones and driving. The ‘Notes’ field in the assessment form should be used for this purpose. 4. The DETR leaflet on the use of mobile phones and driving, produced in UK, gives clear and concise guidance. This guidance has been endorsed by the Association of Chief Police Officers and the Federation of Communication Services (the guidance is available as a glossy leaflet or downloadable from their website at http://www.detr.gov.uk/campaigns/mobile). A hyperlink to this will be added to 's intranet site. 5. The output from the research into health effects of using mobile phones and the effects on driver performance are inconclusive and at times inconsistent. Should this change in time then will take account of developments and amend the safety advice accordingly.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 24 July 2001 11:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By George Wedgwood I agree with most of this debate and where it is leading - banning the use of phones whilst driving, by the driver. Of course there are many cases where the phone can be used by a passenger on 'hands-free' whilst the driver is concentrating on the driving - also, when stopped, it is often more convenient to use on the H-F system. However, perhaps the manufacturers have some leverage here, by installing the kit in such a way as to disable the phone whilst the vehicle is in motion and only allow a series of bleeps to indicate that an incoming call has been received. Then the driver could plan a stop to ring the caller (caller ID in force) back whilst stationary and with the engine off. Despite all these ideas, the really important part of the 'policy' should come from the senior managers and directors, who can set the example to their functional managers who have all the hassle of running the practical part of the business - then and only then will they get together to discover safer ways of doing the business - little of which involves 'writing policies'! Fine, the key points can be set out for managers' guidance but it must be seen as guidance born out of business understanding and not enforcement by the 'policy makers'. I hope that's how the DETR MORR Task Group will report (my Company is a part of this Group) and then companies can decide how best to implement controls. After all, controls should be prioritised and this aspect of safety is important but not the most threatening!
Admin  
#9 Posted : 25 July 2001 11:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Young George, The most important part of any policy should come from unbiased and informed people who can advise on the legal aspects and ensure that H&S considerations are of paramount importance. They should be written to ensure that there is no misunderstanding in what is meant and for evidence that the company is discharging its duty of care to staff. Your assertion appears to be putting business needs before peoples safety, which can be an extremely dangerous situation. You seem to imply that H&S policy makers are a hinderance to managers. Only to those who don't give a ****. Mobile phone use whilst driving increases the risk of accidents, it is well documented and should be legally banned. There is no ocassion when a "functional manager" should be allowed to ignore "guidance" for the exigency of the company. What did people do before the advent of the mobile phone anyway.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 25 July 2001 11:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Waldram Just to broaden the debate - is there any real difference between hands-free mobile phones and radios? If not, then what about those who use radios on a regular basis, e.g. Emergency Services? (Although it may be normal policy for a passenger to use the radio, there are times when the driver has to do it). What about off-road situations, e.g. within large sites, where traffic is lighter and there is usually a local speed limit? What about lessons from aviation, or motor racing about how to use communication systems under stress but safely? I suggest George Wedgewood's approach is more realisitic than an absolute ban.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 26 July 2001 07:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Harper If you want to make it really broad, can anyone remember the guy who got done for undue care and attention for eating his kit kat whilst driving? Is the company at risk if you ban mobile phones and then omit other causes of driving with undue care and attention? As for hands free kits, there was a case in my neck of the woods, where a lorry hit a guy on a push bike. In his statement, he stated that his phone beeped but he didnt answer it. He still was prosecuted...
Admin  
#12 Posted : 26 July 2001 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Webster In reply to Ian Waldram, yes there can be a big difference between radios and mobiles - even hands free. A mobile requires a small button to be located and pressed to answer it. There is an urgency to answer before the caller hangs up - it might be important!! There is probably no prior knowledge of who is calling or what the call is about. The call may be complex, and long. Callers may upset or anger the driver and demand his/her full attention. If the driver is calling out, numbers may have to be looked up and will have to be dialled. Reading and sending of text messages whilst driving adds another dimension to inattention to the road. With 2-way radios, only a single, large press to speak button is used, which can be eliminated with a hands free set. Contact is with a single controller who knows the job and appreciates that you are also driving. Standard RT procedures are generally followed. If it is not convenient to talk, a single response of "standby" or the like will hold the message - there is no need to explain yourself. Messages are as brief as possible, requiring the minimum of driver response. In other words, there are adequate controls in place. There have always been pathetic excuses for inattention, blaming some external distraction as if the magistrate or sheriff will somehow nod sympathetically and hand down a lighter sentence. A concentrating driver is unlikely to be easily distracted. There is a whole heap of driver "activities" which potentially could be banned. It would be impossible to legislate specifically for each one of them. They include using mobiles, eating, drinking, smoking, cranking up the controls of the "mobile disco" or searching for Radio 1 on Drumochter Pass, snogging, reading maps, picking noses and eating the bogeys, shaving, playing the air guitar, putting on make-up, tieing ties, doing the Telegraph crossword, having sex, clipping fingernails, making rude gestures at Volvo drivers, throwing Coke cans at motorcyclists etc., etc. Ciaran is right. The catch-all offence of Driving without due care and attention covers every one. How many of the above do we want to write into our Health & Safety policies for company car drivers. Behaviour on the road is adequately covered by the Highway Code. Some consistency, however, in how the offence is applied and prosecuted is long overdue. John
Admin  
#13 Posted : 26 July 2001 13:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor Whilst supporting John's response to Ian, I cannot totally take Ciaran's position. The snogging and can throwing activities are clearly driver peculiarities but use of the mobile phone whilst driving may well be part of the 'work activities' (taking orders, having mobile conferences, etc) and, if recognised as part of the normal and expected behaviour of employees, implicate the employer. There are, of course, other work activities where the use of a phone (or distraction by one) could have serious consequences (eg on roofs, up ladders, operating certain machinery, etc) I believe that, where necessary, employers should make their position clear in saying that the risks associated with mobile phone use at work must be addressed and phones not used in some circumstances - including driving.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 26 July 2001 16:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Euan McKie Good to see so many responses on this subject. anyone that overlooks this issue should look at recent cases on this subject including " Text Message HGV driver jailed for 5yrs for killing man in lay-by". Raising the awareness within companies through a policy on the subject is a step in the right direction
Admin  
#15 Posted : 31 July 2001 07:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Urquhart Keith. This is an interesting topic and it has on several occassions previously been raised in this Forum. I have also previously contributed. I apologise for this lengthy contribution in advance, but I believe the second part of your question raises the issues of what is not just a UK dilema but a world wide socio economic evolutionery and safety issue. I support some of the views expressed and disagree with others. I certainly believe that where a Company supplies the Phone in a vehicle which is part of the employees work equipment, it should as a minimum remind the vehicle driver of the requirements of The Highway Code and The Road Traffic Act. I do believe that driving and talking on a mobile telephone, hand held or hands free distract attention and concentration and as such the practice clearly in my view contributes to the potential for Road Traffic Accidents with who knows what consequences. I have first hand experience of being rear end shunted on the M1 in heavy traffic by a vehicle where the driver was using his hand held mobile. I had twice prior to the shunt seen him in my rear view mirror, accelerating from the stop go pattern that the Motorways attract at times of peak traffic, and then observed the momentery panic on his face as he realised that the traffic in front of him had stopped, AGAIN!!!. The third time despite me having changed lanes he hit me. Fortuneately damage was slight and injury was more to him and his deameanour than anything else. There is however no doubt in my mind that that driver was not fully in control and was a liability and a pre-emptor of a Traffic Accident. I believe that companies have to recognise this fact and accept some responsibility for the way mobiles are used by their drivers. I currently live and work in Hong Kong and here on the 1st., July 2001 Road Traffic Legislation was introduced making it an offence to use and speak on and use a hand held mobile phone if you are the driver of a vehicle. (Taxi's and Public Light Buses included). As I have said before in this forum if you take a Cantonese persons mobile away from them it is like killing them, the mobile is like their heart or lungs, without it they can't live!!! Daily, I and colleagues travelling by road to work see 100's of motorists ignoring and probably oblivious of this new law. The evidence of the enforcement rate I have not been able to ascertain as yet but you certainly don't see many patroling traffic police pulling motorists for the offence. I will keep monitoring however. And at length to the scond part of your question. I believe that there are many other areas of work and the work environment where the use of Mobile telephones are pre-emptors for or of accidents. Crane operators, Dumptruck drivers, the Carpentar pushing the timber through the circular saw etc., etc., The interesting thing is that the Phone always takes priority. If it rings, even with WAP, Text, Messaging systems, vibration, flashing lights, bells and whistles, the phone dominates. This is a worry. If we miss a call is it so important? If the Crane driver inching the load to it's final position and concentrating on the banksman signallers signals suddenly transfers his concentration to his ringing telephone and answers it, what is the percentage ratio of times that he can do this before this action is a contributor to an accident. There is some information in the investigation of an Air Crash in Thailand in 1998 that shows that a number of passengers were using their Mobile Telephones, contrary to Civil Aviation safety advice. Following the cabin announcement that the flight was diverting to another airport pasengers used their Mobiles to inform third parties of the diversion after aboting landing attempts in heavy rain, and that there meeting /collection arrangements would have to change. Whether or not the use of the Mobiles and there operating frequency signals interfered sufficiently to conribute to the downing of the plane and the loss of some 140 lives is unclear but the suspicion is there. ( The use of the phones was established by checking the Air time accounts of the deceaseds phones.) It is known that Mobiles and there frquencies can interfere with equipmnt in many environments, (Hospital ICU's, Laboratories, Control Rooms etc.,) and there is risk that selfish and unthinking members of society will blatantly continue using there phones regardles of risk, established and proven or suspected. Enter Mobile telephone traffic accidents or similar as a search engine topic on your computer and see what you come up with. All around the world mobile telecomunications are posing threats to Health and safety issues and the call for bans and enforcement laws to prevent there use in certain conditions is becoming truly International.(Particularly Driving situations). In the UK RoSPA has done a lot of research in this area and considerable lobbying with some success. They are seeking a total ban on the use by the driver of mobile phones. The RoSpa web site has lots of information. One thing that striks me in all these sessions of disussion on this topic is that no one to my knowledge anyway has come up with any statistics. Can we, (Maybe IOSH as a Project) get some base line information together,What is the recorded incidence of Mobile Phone use related accidents. All kinds and categories. Industrial and commercial workplace use, domestic, personal and leisure use. Do the Insurance companies have any infomation about accidents that indicate that mobile telphones were or might have been implicated. (Road traffic Accidents particularly) How many organisations have some corporate policy, rules or procedures about Mobile Telephones, there provision, use and the retrictions, (accident prevention related).And if they have rules etc, why? What prompted them to develop them? What about the behavioural issues, why must we recognise and answer a ringing telephone as a priority, or is this a myth. In the age of an ever shrinking world and advancing technology, society that more and more puts its faith in gizmos and appliances, are we really awake to the potential problems and downsides arising from the appartus/equipment/resource as well as accepting its benefits? Or are we just going to let evolution carry us along. When shall we get the first implant mobile communication device? Will people want one? Will it be a must have? What hazards will such devices bring? Far fetched, well maybe, but they are bringing back (for those young at heart enough to remember him from The Eagle Comic) Dan Dare!!!! I look forward to some real and interseting debate. Regards. Ken Urquhart For anyone who wants to contact me direct e-mail: kenurquhart@pccw.com
Admin  
#16 Posted : 31 July 2001 19:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Waterton hi, i have not checked all the other responses so someone may have mentioned..there is a guidance leaflet free of charge, produced by the relevant gov't dept..we have tended to use there recommendations.. you should note also where they feel and can proove using a mobile has contributed to an incident..some police forces will use this as part of a prosecution..ie. driver was not in control of the vehicle...
Admin  
#17 Posted : 05 August 2001 21:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Harmsworth Sorry to come to the debate late but I have been away on holiday. One thing puzzles me, why is it unsafe for me to use a hands free mobile phone but safe for police and ambulance drivers when on thier own in the cab to use thier radio's? The answer is of course is that provided it is truely a hands free set and is used inteligentley, then it is not.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.