Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
stan2kuk  
#1 Posted : 19 July 2019 11:19:18(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
stan2kuk

I am involved in a working group on our site tasked with controlling HAVS exposure. We have measured the vibration emitted by all our hand tools and calculated the exposure points for each per 5mins/15min/1hr. We also have a operators record, where the end user records what tool they are using and the duration. Built into this record are exposure limit stop and check points(x2), which require supervisor authorisation to exceed until the daily exposure limit is reached.

What I need to know is what is the legal requirement for me to keep these records, or can they be disposed of each day if the maximum exposure limit isn't reached? Also do I need to keep the raw data from the vibration emission tests now that we have calculated the exposure points for each tool?

I also have various bits of kit to undertake dynamic sampling of employees using HAVS rated tooling.

Roundtuit  
#2 Posted : 19 July 2019 12:53:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Today's maximum may not be tomorrows

If you throw away records daily how do you know what the employee has been previously exposed to?

Were they 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 of the maximum on a particular day?

Persistently at that level every working day because that is how the supervisor sign off works?

Perthaps the question isn't about the records being generated but the policy using the data to drive a change to zero exposure rather than just keeping the employees under a limit.

Roundtuit  
#3 Posted : 19 July 2019 12:53:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Today's maximum may not be tomorrows

If you throw away records daily how do you know what the employee has been previously exposed to?

Were they 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 of the maximum on a particular day?

Persistently at that level every working day because that is how the supervisor sign off works?

Perthaps the question isn't about the records being generated but the policy using the data to drive a change to zero exposure rather than just keeping the employees under a limit.

stevedm  
#4 Posted : 22 July 2019 08:06:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevedm

There isn't any legal requirements as what you are recording is just compliance information by the looks of it..the only guidance is in Health Surviellence - to be completed at job start (within 6 months) and 3 yearly regardless of reported symptoms.

I would keep the weekly exposure as management records and use that for trend data as I ask for it so that I can see the work trends before carrying out the health checks.  It might be prudent to keep the information for up to 3 years incase of a claim...although it will be your health check data that would be more important in a claim...so you can decide it can be 6 months on site, 6 month archive and then destroy.  If the information is summrised in an independant audit of the site (Evaluation of compliance for example) then you could go for less...

thanks 3 users thanked stevedm for this useful post.
webstar on 22/07/2019(UTC), A Kurdziel on 23/07/2019(UTC), stan2kuk on 26/07/2019(UTC)
JohnW  
#5 Posted : 22 July 2019 10:30:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JohnW

Keep the records. That way, if an employee develops some issues with his hands you can show that you have been controling vibration exposure at work. Employees can develop havs outside work e.g. commuting every day by motor cycle, a 40 minute round trip will expose the rider to significant hand/arm vibration. .
Bigmac1  
#6 Posted : 23 July 2019 11:14:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bigmac1

Yep, keep the records its your only defence, just scan them in.

thanks 1 user thanked Bigmac1 for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 23/07/2019(UTC)
stan2kuk  
#7 Posted : 26 July 2019 11:25:34(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
stan2kuk

Thanks for replies lots of good thoughts to consider. We employ over 8000 personnel on our site and can have 1-2 hundred personnel using HAVS toolings in any one week, so not that practical to keep that many individual records. We will be monitoring and keeping records of anyone who goes over the second threshold point as well as trending high risk users with data gathered from dynamic sampling. We do have a policy in place to manage HAVS exposure and we undertake a minimum of quarterly process confirmation audits to measure adherence and effectiveness of this policy

Connor35037  
#8 Posted : 26 July 2019 14:55:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Connor35037

While we're on the subject of HAV; the HSE Guidance document L140 (revised) is now available.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.