IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Ideal 4815 guillotine checks and inspection guidance
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi,
We have recently purchased an Ideal 4815 guillotine for cutting paper (office environment) and while I have read the PUWER ACOP and the HSE "safe use of power-operated paper cutting guillotines" I am unsure whether the extent of the checks / inspections (daily / monthly / 6 month) would apply? My thought process behind this is that the guidance feels like it is more for industrial environments with bigger machines.
Gut feeling is that some level of inspections and checks are needed, but just wondered if anyone else out there has experience of the this type of machinery in an office environment?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Whilst your device may not be the same scale as those described in the ACOP it is a powered blade and it relies upon an interlocked guard to keep the operator safe. Checking the interlock operates before use, after blade change and at service (Table 1) is a must (the latter two in case the switch is damaged).
I take it this machine is not for significant use in which case the industrial application described in the ACOP would as you say appear OTT. We have a larger guillotine which used to operate daily but can now go for months without use - we don't power up just to conduct checks but do ensure a thorough pre-use inspection before processing any orders.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Whilst your device may not be the same scale as those described in the ACOP it is a powered blade and it relies upon an interlocked guard to keep the operator safe. Checking the interlock operates before use, after blade change and at service (Table 1) is a must (the latter two in case the switch is damaged).
I take it this machine is not for significant use in which case the industrial application described in the ACOP would as you say appear OTT. We have a larger guillotine which used to operate daily but can now go for months without use - we don't power up just to conduct checks but do ensure a thorough pre-use inspection before processing any orders.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks for the reply.
I have pre-use checks as part of the SOP and RA, so similar to the approach you have for your guillotine.
It was just the infrequent use / low volumes of materials processed that was throwing me and knock on effect on ensuring safety and compliance without going OTT.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If it's big enough to cut your hands off in the event that the interlock is faulty then, yes, I would apply every check necessary. You'd be hard pushed to put your whole body in it, but you don't need to put your whole body in to have a life changing accident.
Check and check again.
|
1 user thanked hilary for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
6 monthly safety check by a competent person. PLUS pre use inspection by the operator.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks.
Just checked and a service contract is in place, which will encompass regular checks by a competent person.
Edited by user 30 August 2019 11:18:30(UTC)
| Reason: spelling competent as component
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Ideal 4815 guillotine checks and inspection guidance
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.