Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Eddscott  
#1 Posted : 29 July 2024 10:08:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Eddscott

For office based staff or those working in set locations, the appplication of the welfare requirements is easy. How are you managing these for transiant or Peripatetic workers?

For exmaple - we have 5 Sales Reps who travel all over the country, they normally stop off at cafe, service stations etc and stop for a rest, drink , toilet break etc.  One rep has said we need to provide them with water (so we have give them a water bottle for them to fill before they leave the house) . The welfare at work act states an employer must provide facilities such as toilets, somewhere clean to eat and hot running water.

As their works are not office based - impossible for "us" to povide, but we can provide them with details of where they could use - we also ask for them to plan their works to take into consideration reset breaks.

We also have a team of mobile customer satisfiaction survey people, who travel on public transport doing surveys, we provide them with key "stops" with rest facilities, but not every stop has a toilet hence the question how do you manage these requirements?

Roundtuit  
#2 Posted : 29 July 2024 11:13:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

The 1992 regulations include the phrase "In so far as is reasonably practicable" ergo at a fixed location all provision should be available, in a temporary location / construction provision commensurate with the number of employees over the duration of the works (Site cabin through groundhog to a "welfare van").

As for travelling sales reps etc. unless your company puts them in plush motorhomes "reasonably practicable" does become motorway services, cafes and supermarkets.

Our sales team hold regular meetings at a major coffee chain which then bring reminders about IT security.

These are grown up people working without direct supervisory oversight - finding food, drink and toilets should not be too arduous a challenge.

thanks 4 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
MikeKelly on 29/07/2024(UTC), LancBob on 30/07/2024(UTC), MikeKelly on 29/07/2024(UTC), LancBob on 30/07/2024(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#3 Posted : 29 July 2024 11:13:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

The 1992 regulations include the phrase "In so far as is reasonably practicable" ergo at a fixed location all provision should be available, in a temporary location / construction provision commensurate with the number of employees over the duration of the works (Site cabin through groundhog to a "welfare van").

As for travelling sales reps etc. unless your company puts them in plush motorhomes "reasonably practicable" does become motorway services, cafes and supermarkets.

Our sales team hold regular meetings at a major coffee chain which then bring reminders about IT security.

These are grown up people working without direct supervisory oversight - finding food, drink and toilets should not be too arduous a challenge.

thanks 4 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
MikeKelly on 29/07/2024(UTC), LancBob on 30/07/2024(UTC), MikeKelly on 29/07/2024(UTC), LancBob on 30/07/2024(UTC)
peter gotch  
#4 Posted : 29 July 2024 11:55:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Edd - I would broaden the consideration to your approach to how you look after ALL aspects of these transient workers.

So, an overall plan for getting rep R from base location to locations M, N, O and P and back. How are they travelling, where do they stop off in the day and perhaps one or more overnights? - and what are the contingencies in place for when Plan A doesn't work?

As Roundtuit says they are grown-ups and should be able to find a loo (assuming they are not in the middle of nowhere when "behind a bush" might be the only option) and I tend to the view that your overall lone worker policy and how it is put in place is a greater issue to think about.

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.