Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
E Bromiley  
#1 Posted : 21 May 2024 16:34:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
E Bromiley

Hi all, I am doing a dissertation on silica/RCS and as far as I can tell nothing has happened since the UK Government All Party Parliamentary Group for Respiratory Health produced their report "Silica - The Next Asbestos", or their follow-up investigation into risk reduction strategies entitled 'Improving Silicosis Outcomes in the UK', published in 2023. Is anyone aware of any action taken?

A Kurdziel  
#2 Posted : 22 May 2024 11:50:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

I would not call this a government report. An  All Party Parliamentary Group(APPG) is a group of back bench MPs getting together to make suggestions or recommendations. The government is not required to adopt these recommendations. It is expected that the government will respond in some way to this report even if they just say it’s a load of baloney.

On the 25th of January this year the chair of the Respiratory Health APPG, Jim Shannon asked a parliamentary question about this and Paul Maynard,  the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Pensions( whose remit  covers occupational H&S)  replied that the current arrangements for managing RCS are fine and he does not envision any changes to the current arrangements.

thanks 2 users thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
peter gotch on 22/05/2024(UTC), HSSnail on 22/05/2024(UTC)
peter gotch  
#3 Posted : 22 May 2024 12:07:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Hi E

I can't see anything coming out of this any time soon, unless an incoming Labour Government significantly ups the standard of protection for workers on whatever type of contract.

We have had years and years of cuts to public services and those have impacted the resourcing of the HSE and other regulators, and more so at the sharp end (as it is more difficult to take the axe to policy people).

HSE is hardly likely to be pushing for more regulation when it hasn't got sufficient resources to effectively enforce what is already in place, where there has been a long term skew towards the risks that are acute, and less towards those which are of a chronic nature.

Hence, as example, you see much more enforcement for people falling (or potentially falling) from or through roofs and virtually none in terms of that same population of workers being exposed to occupational health risks including asbestos and silica, despite it being very clear that far more of that population will die prematurely as a result of exposure of hazardous materials than fall to their deaths. [With a similar disparity at lower severities of harm].

If the average worker feels more secure in their employment, then they might be more inclined to comment on unsafe working conditions and be more likely to whistle blow than at present.

thanks 2 users thanked peter gotch for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 22/05/2024(UTC), HSSnail on 22/05/2024(UTC)
HSSnail  
#4 Posted : 22 May 2024 14:51:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Are the actions they suggest actualy achievable? Or is it like the one to remove all asbestos by a certain date (sorry forget the date) that did not take into account the number of companies that would be needed and disposal sites avialable?

A Kurdziel  
#5 Posted : 22 May 2024 15:31:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Nothing Earth Shattering:

 Clinical Recommendations

  1. Silicosis is included as a notifiable disease.
  2. Notification of previous RCS exposure to be made  accessible within secondary care i.e. better record keeping of exposure to  RCS and sharing between medical practitioners.
  3. GP’s to be notified if a patient tests positive during workplace health surveillance.
  4. Records of health surveillance to be kept even if employee leaves the company and shared with patient’s GP.

Regulatory Recommendations

  1. All government supported building industry vocational training should include the risks posed by RCS.
  2. The  HSE to do more to warn people of the risks posed by RCS in building and other trades.
  3.  HSE to reduce the WEL for work with silica to 0.05 mg/m3.
  4. Improve testing and to develop a real time monitoring  of RCS in the workplace.

But as Peter says, the HSE has been cut to the bone and if they adopt any of these recommendations, they will either need to find more money or  cut something else to pay for it.  

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.