Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 09 March 2005 16:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Roger the Dodger
HSE are recruting new trainee inspectors!

Ah Ah I thought, at least read the Prospectus

1st Section
Starting Salary is £20581

Didn't bother with the rest of the Prospectus - can't afford the pay drop...

Any other offers applicants

Admin  
#2 Posted : 09 March 2005 18:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Lee
Not a bad starting salary for someone straight out of university and a good way into the field unlike jobs for the boys which want 5 years experience.

Dont suspect there will be a shortage of applicants.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 09 March 2005 18:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Craythorne
The pay may not be the best in the world but all the training is paid for and after a few years in the HSE the jobs market opens up quite well.

Paul Craythorne
Admin  
#4 Posted : 09 March 2005 20:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Karen Todd
I did apply for one of the jobs for the boys Peter with not much success.

Applied for one of the mechanical specialists positions and despite more than meeting the criteria (am a chartered mechanical engineer, have NEBOSH Dip 1 and waiting on results for Dip 2, and having 7 years industrial experience which includes all the areas they wanted you to have experience in) I didn't even get an interview. I was a bit gobsmacked at not even getting an interview if I'm honest.

I'd been waiting for ages for the trainee inspector positions to be advertised, but as the others have said could not take the huge cut in salary.

Regards,

Karen
Admin  
#5 Posted : 09 March 2005 23:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
I was hoping for a role with the HMRI with 22 year working in the railway industry etc. However, I figure that at my age (46) I have missed my chance, pay cut or not.

The role advertised seems to me like safety on the cheap. After all, the university of life is an important factor. You cannot learn that at uni.

Ray
Admin  
#6 Posted : 10 March 2005 09:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Roger the Dodger
Fair comment, the salary is ok for someone straight out of University - but not for people in mid career who can't afford the salary drop.

I have no doubt, that they will get enough applicants

Guess the HSE, like other Gov Dep'ts want younsters because they are cheap and can be more easily molded into their ways of working.

Guess a lot of us mid career people are just too cynical about the world of safety, despite having adequate qualifications etc.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 10 March 2005 12:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
As Roger implies, getting graddies may be a short term solution but when they have got the experience will they be retained?

In the past the HSE have sought experienced staff with qualifications. A knowledge of a particular industry, implicit and explicit should be a requisite I would have thought.

Must be well past my sell-by date !

Ray
Admin  
#8 Posted : 10 March 2005 12:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Lee
Note these are "trainee" positions. I wonder how many people would take umbrage at a trainee H&S officer with a starting salary of £20K in another organisation.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 10 March 2005 13:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
Is it me or are HSE Inspectors getting less and less "experienced" ie how many Inspectors have any concept of what it is like to be "on the other side of the desk".

In my view HSE and EA Inspectors should have to have Indsutrial Experience or be seconded to Industry before they are "let loose".

How many experienced HSE Managers & Officers are ging to see entering the HSE / EA as a career move, on this sort of salary?
Admin  
#10 Posted : 10 March 2005 14:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephen Woods
The HSE said they were moving away from training graduates as they could learn the theory but were unable to put it to use in a real life environment. I know two people who were recruited from industry no H&S experiance other than that gained on the shop floor. Thier manager who sits on a H&S forum I vice chair says theyre among the best he's had working for him.

The company I work for has a policy of employing graduates and the Directors acmit it's because they're come at about half the cost of someone of a similar age with practical experiance.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 10 March 2005 22:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp
Peter, you have made your point, £20K may not be a bad salary for a trainee, some may disagree. However, and correct me if I am wrong, the crux of the argument is whether experience in a particular sector should be integral part of the selection and recruitment process. After all, we are talking about HSE Inspectors are we not.

Incidentally, you can start with LUL as a station assistant (no qualifcations required) on a basic salary of about £19K. Put in perspective £20K does not seem that attractive even for a graduate.

Ray
Admin  
#12 Posted : 11 March 2005 09:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Emma Forbes
I was quite disappointed to see the salary band on the posts. Although I'm training just now, I'm not too far off that wage already. And if I take into account of the extra travelling I would be worse off. So, I think I'll stay this side of H&S. I don't know if I'm wrong, but I certainly enjoy the challenge of solving the H&S problems as well as drawing attention to them.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 11 March 2005 09:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MC
Hello all,

So if I am a not so recent (post)graduate (graduated 7 years ago, age almost 30) with 14 months relevant experience, a nebosh cert, am I too old? too good? could go either way if i applied as with any job?

I do recall reading that a HSE employee's survey didnt come out too well either!

It is 2 years' structered training upto NVQ level 5 and then continued training for another 3 years - so I do feel more experienced people's comments on graduates not having experience is a bit harsh. You can learn alot in those years - give graduates some credit!

All the best
MC
Admin  
#14 Posted : 11 March 2005 16:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
yeh but no but!! how many ex HSE inspectors end up in plumb jobs!!!

Looks good on the CV forget that I am a little hitler who knows a lot of legislation but not how to work safety etc.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 11 March 2005 21:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian J. Durber
Just a note for those of you concerned about HSE's 'age' of entry from their equal ops. statement:

"HSE is committed to equality of opportunity .We aim to reflect the diversity of the community we protect. Applications are encouraged from individuals regardless of disability, gender ethnic origin, sexual orientation, age or religion".

Hope this is useful to the debate.

Regards,

I. Durber
Admin  
#16 Posted : 22 March 2005 15:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Joe Hardiment
As a graduate I am very lucky to be gaining experience with a local company. However, if I had not landed on my feet I would be applying to the HSE, What a great opportunity!

In addition, my liittle experience in safety, has told me that a mixture of experience, qualification and common sense is the key. Lets face it, it depends on the individual and how they get on with people.

I have already met people with loads of both experience and qualification, who get things wrong.

Just a graduate thought tho.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 26 March 2005 15:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Pat Burns MIOSH, RSP - SpDipEM - AMIQA
If the government of today was as committed to health & safety as businesses were they should remunarate at a competitive salary to try and attract qualified professionals from industry.

As previously stated it is all to well recruiting graduates from Uni but there is no in depth knowledge to underpin the training they receive. In most cases as we used to say in the Royal Navy with regards to direct entry officers and technicians: No CDF.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 04 April 2005 12:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lisa Eldridge
I have to disagree with the last post. We all have to start our careers somewhere - someone put their faith in you to do the job and provided you with training and development. I think it is a wonderful idea to train graduates up, they will have two years of class room and on the job training - that is probably more than some have. I agree that graduates do not have life/work experience on the job - but they will get that. I have just got through to the assessment centre and I graduated 6 years ago and have two years experience in H&S - but what a great opportunity it is and don't mind taking a pay cut!
Admin  
#19 Posted : 07 April 2005 23:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick TM Patience
I am a health and safety inspector and have been for 9 years. it is interesting to read the comments on this forum. when I joined HSE I was an Intensive Care Charge Nurse and was earning £21k, the trainee inspector pay back then was £14k. I felt back then that the temporary pay drop was worth it for the long term. I have received large amounts of training,obtained a post-graduate diploma in OHS, gained experience of regulating in several different industries and hopefully helped to improve the working lives of people at work. Perhaps I am a bit altruistic but I still try to approach the job for the reason that I started: to stop people needing the sort of treatment in hospital that I gave them for the first few years of my working life. Donald Trunkey an American Traumatologist suggested that the best treatment for trauma was to prevent it in the first place.

Pay isn't everything.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 08 April 2005 10:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Roger the Dodger
Quite agree pay isn't everything, but try telling that to someone trying to pay a mortgage, feed the kids etc.

There is no way I could even contemplate taking the HSE jobs on the salary the advert suggests. Hence why I think it it is unlikely that an experienced/mid career safety manager will apply - unless of course they are so driven to take a large salary cut. This is despite still being highly motivated about improving the working lives of people.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 08 April 2005 11:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ralph Baqar
Roger, I’ve yet to come across anyone who has worked as a health and safety professional and then joined HSE as an inspector.

HSE usually take on university graduates and then send them to undertake a post graduate diploma and follow this on by furthers in-house training.


I’d be very interested to hear of any inspectors who were formally external safety advisors before they joined HSE.
Admin  
#22 Posted : 08 April 2005 17:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simon Rider
I found the comment in the last response very interesting

Having the NEBOSH Cert
BSc(Hon) in Occupational Health and Safety
An ex fire prevention officer 12 years
10 years as a health and safety manager in construction and National Health
Lecturing at University
Willing to take a £17,000 per year pay cut to do something I believed would be worthwhile

Alas my results of the “on line” numerical test were apparently not high enough to get an interview
Perhaps you’re right and it’s not the policy of the HSE to recruit experienced health and safety professionals but a numerical test is more important!

or perhaps I'm to old?
Admin  
#23 Posted : 11 April 2005 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Brown
Lots of interesting responses here, some inaccuracies though. I was an HSE general inspector until 2 years ago. I originally joined in 98 on 18K. The training lasts 2 years including 6 months at Aston University to get the Diploma. After that you get promoted adding around 4k to the salary (98 prices). The other training is fantastic in its depth and breadth. You get excellent support from colleagues during training also.

Salary is not great to start with but what you also have to remember (and HSE is not very good at pointing out these) is 13.5% on top of your salary into your pension. All travel is on company time so you don't have to work over a 37 hour week, 5 1/2 weeks leave (goes upto 6 1/2 after about 8 years service). Very family friendly for time off, part time and flexible working for mothers. For me after 5 years the package was worth about 30k (2003)

Of the 120 people recruited the same time as me maybe one or two had previous H&S management experience. None were straight from university and I was one of the youngest in my late 20's. Minimum requirement is 2 years of work in any discipline. HSE changed its recruiting procedure in 98 and went to a detailed evidence based assessment, ie daunting application form, psychometric testing session (half day) and if you passed that full assessment day of various exercises. The figures i recall were 10000 application forms requested, 2000 returned, 500 assessed, 120 appointed. HSE like to recruit people with good interpersonal skills and then train them to think like inspectors (not the same as thinking like a safety manager in my opinion)

Some of the respondents to the original post were qualified engineers who would not normally apply as general inspectors but as specialists. Starting salaries for specialists are much better generally and take more account of free market prices (ie more if theres a shortage of a particular discipline). Specialists generally have more chance for promotion than general inspectors.

One of my former colleagues left for a consultancy job 30k plus car etc worked 50 hours week for 12 months and then went back to HSE as he preferred it. Very few from that original number have actually left to my knowledge and HSE generally has a low staff turnover for inspectors.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 11 April 2005 13:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert S Woods
I have to sympathise with Simons plight.

I have been informed that I was in the top 30% for what "verbal test", scored in the bottom 16% for the numeracy. It would appear that I took to long to answer the questions. 19 mins as opposed the 12-minute norm. I can account for at least five minutes of this in time spent answering phone calls and getting my son to lend me his calculator (mine packed in).

I have to say I find it unlikely that Inspectors use a lot of means, medians, percentiles and modes in their every day activities.

I do think it is a good method of reducing the chances of anyone other than those newly graduated passing. Or another way of looking at it: by passing the equal ops policy re: ageism.

C'est La Vie.
Admin  
#25 Posted : 11 April 2005 15:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CJ
Their email response to me after the completion of the tests was priceless.


HSE:'Subject: Invitation to complete personality questionaire.'

My thoughts: looks like good news!

HSE: We are pleased to inform you that you have met the standards required to attend our assessment centre.

My thoughts: Very good news!

HSE: However due to the larger than expected amount of responses we can only place you on the reserve list.

My thoughts: Bugger!

Then someone from the HSE phoned congratulating me, even though i haven't got an interview.

What a weird world it is

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.