Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 01 March 2006 12:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By cfraser I have been trying to move into health and safety for some time now, I live in East Yorks but am willing to travel. Most of the time I was told that jobs were limited with only holding NEBOSH cert, I have now passed NEBOSH Dip 1, will this open more doors for that elusive Health and Safety position,or perhaps that elusive employer is looking for something else? any thoughts, regards Colin
Admin  
#2 Posted : 01 March 2006 12:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh If you haven't already, join IOSH. What you need is experience. The problem is that (without knocking you or anyone else) is that every one and his brother/sister wants to be "in Safety". I think that this is mainly because it allows someone without much in the way of a formal education to eventually enter a "Profession". Of course, newcomers take lower salaries - and this drags down "Professional salaries" to safety officers to the same level as dustbinmen.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 01 March 2006 13:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By cfraser gary, cheers, I am a member of IOSH and have approx 10 years of experience although not full time, in industries such as marine, power generation, petro-chemical and oil/gas, most of my experience is within operations approx 20 years.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 01 March 2006 14:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Howard Be interested to know what qualifies as a formal education
Admin  
#5 Posted : 01 March 2006 14:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mr T Wilcock Garyh, I find your comments to be aloof,condecending and insultive. Myself i have no 'formal education' but after a long number of years working in a very specialised field [see appointed person post] i regard myself as having a profession. Unfortunately i have met several formally educated and professional people within my field who's ability and knowledge to say the least, is questionable. You also may find this hard to believe, there are dustbinmen who are educated, though some obviously not to your standard. Who was quoted to say, "he is obviously so well educated, to be so ignorant"
Admin  
#6 Posted : 01 March 2006 14:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh Formal education? I mean by that someone who has formal qualifications such as: O Levels, A levels, GCSEs, HNC, HND, Degree that sort of thing. I have come across many Safety Officers who have come "off the tools" and have no experience of things like data analysis, report writing, running meetings, taking minutes, writing procedures, auditing etc........ You need to be able to do this, and more, to step up to "the next level" and be a Professional. You tend to aquire these skills to an extent during further and higher education and then as your career progresses, but not if you left school, went straight into an apprenticeship and then a trade. This hypothetical tradesperon could then take the NEBOSH certificate and be qualified but may lack "formal education" and the skills outlined above. With time, however it can be done. It doesn't happen overnight though. NOTE I am making a general point here, in Colin's case here this is not the case. As regards experience, I mean experience in direct hands on Safety Management which is the key.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 01 March 2006 15:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MMM I must say I also found your (gary) comments rude and condesending, however, it is not the first (and no doubt not the last) time I have heard someone take this approach/attitude. Firstly I would like to make a distinction between Site Safety Officers and 'Safety Professionals'. In my opinion (and please correct me if anyone has other views)SSO's are what i would call 'front room' safety staff and SP's are what I would call 'back room' safety staff. One type i would expect to come to work with his steel toe caps and a high vis vest, the other with his parker pen and shirt and tie. Both of these are of equal value in the workplace but both require very different 'skill sets'. I know many of both types of people but there are some Safety Professionals (academics) I would not let anywhere near a construction site just the same as I would not let some SSO's anywhere near a safety and health plan/policy/procedure review session. I beleive the key to success is when these people work together to link the theoretical side of safety to the practical side of safety. I also do not agree that formal education gives a person the skill sets that you refer to eg running meetings....I know many graduates that can barely run a bath nevermind a meeting. Furthermore I didnt realise that you learnt how to take minutes on formal educational courses (I also thought this deliverable was normally that of the administratinal assistant). The vast majority of the SSO's that I have worked with also are far better at auditing that the academics as they have a real understanding of the practice and take a far more practical approach. I think the bottom line is simple, a balance of academia and practical experience is what is required......but you dont get the necessary experience by means formal education...it is by carrying out work in that particular environment eg ON SITE....so in my view a safety officer with practical experience with a formal safety qualification is worth his weight in gold! I look forward to any other view that people may have. Regards, MMM Site Safety Officer
Admin  
#8 Posted : 01 March 2006 15:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Howard Garyh, this surely has to be a wind up?? Many of the best Safety People have come through the route you find hard to accept, who understands the task in hand and can formulate a safe means of completing it. If you think Safety is just about report writing or Auditing then god help us, It’s about dealing with people. I left school with no qualifications but have worked hard since to remedy that. I take it from the standard of written English your first post, that you don’t have a formal education either.!! Remember Competence is a balance of experience, qualifications, common sense etc. Doesn’t all happen at once, these “newcomers” need a break just like the rest of us. Smacks to me of “ I’ve made it now pull up the ladder”. I would like to know how you managed your first break into safety? Colin has you looked at working overseas in the oil & gas industry; try typing Safety Jobs, Middle East. There are plenty to look at there and your background should count for something. Howard- "No Formal Education"
Admin  
#9 Posted : 01 March 2006 16:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh True I missed off the people skills bit. My point is (try reading what I actually wrote) is that becoming a bone fide Safety Professional (it IS a profession - or can just anyone do it?) is difficult for those without formal education. Not impossible. And I stand by my point that a lot of people from Trades background etc see it is an easy route into a "white collar" job. They accept low salaries, dragging down average salaries. How often does a Solicitor or Doctor get asked "how do I get into your Profession mate?" - I get asked this a lot (don't we all?) Why is that? Note that IOSH is trying to revamp and toughen up it's membership structure - surely to raise standards and profesionalism? I have nothing against anyone trying to get into Safety, but if they wish to achieve a higher status then it will take time. How I got into Safety - went to University (Chemistry degree). Realised lab work was "dead end" so went into Environment as an Env officer. Then became a SHE Officer, did NEBOSH cert. Much in house (big Company training) and got MIOSH. Eventually got first SHE "Manager" job after 10 years in SHE. And so on. In other words I needed a lot of Management skills to make the transition from Safety "Officer" to "Manager". Being a good SO ain't enough to make you able to be a Safety Manager. (Look at the army - how many Sergeants could be an officer and vice versa?)
Admin  
#10 Posted : 01 March 2006 17:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mr T Wilcock Gary, your reply reflects on your attitude towards the ' lower ranks '. In which part of your education did you study military protocol and rank structure? After 14 years in the armed forces i will treat your opinion with the contempt it deserves........
Admin  
#11 Posted : 01 March 2006 18:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Howard I'll second that
Admin  
#12 Posted : 01 March 2006 19:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Fisher Gary Whether I agree with your comments or not doesn't matter, but I would like to acknowledge the fact that you stated your opinion. I am disappointed that some of the other respondents have chosen to critisise you rather than argue an alternative view; this happens all to often on this Forum. They could have made a case like MMM and Howard. Bill
Admin  
#13 Posted : 01 March 2006 21:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By phil Facts are bound to hurt some and facinate others! But the fact remains, with due respect to dutmen, tool-men, the X army....most of those that are able to get the chartership in IOSH are, those with a NEBOSH diploma, and a few others who happen to be on the Director of Safety level or those that knew someone.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 01 March 2006 21:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By phil One other thing.... there is more to safety, than just telling people "not to bend down" what is a HAZAN? (no checking in google please)
Admin  
#15 Posted : 02 March 2006 07:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh I believe that HAZAN stands for "Hazard Analysis". It was used in a COMAH Safety report I managed. Basically the way we did it was to look at worst case scenarios (fire, explosion, loss of containment) and then look at initiating events. The HAZAN part was looking at the factors leading to initiation - eg possibility of leak leading to flammable materials present, then the possibility of ignition source and so on. You also look at historical events, design factors etc and eventually feed all this into a quantified risk assessment. I was involved in the HAZAN process however it was complex - we used a Consultant (HFL) for this.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 02 March 2006 07:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith Archer. Phil, "most of those that are able to get the chartership in IOSH are, those with a NEBOSH diploma, and a few others who happen to be on the Director of Safety level or those that knew someone". Please elaborate Keith
Admin  
#17 Posted : 02 March 2006 08:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Carl West I'd be more interested for an explination of the last part of the statement - "..or those who knew someone" Carl
Admin  
#18 Posted : 02 March 2006 09:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Thompson CMIOSH from the tools to CMIOSH 10 years expierience in a senior role looking after 6000 staff in over 200 buildings. No A levels no O levels no. No prosecutions national recognition in my field. Must have got something wrong eh
Admin  
#19 Posted : 02 March 2006 09:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gorkir I'm sorry but I have to ask Gary this question are you an EHO? because in my opinion EHOs are one of the most snobby professions I have ever come across
Admin  
#20 Posted : 02 March 2006 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh The fact that I don't know what an EHO is tells you that I am not one. Why do so many responses attack me and not address the issue? Let's have constructive comments. Finding fault with other people's comments is easy..............
Admin  
#21 Posted : 02 March 2006 10:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MMM Dare I say it but I think that the fact that gary doesnt know what a EHO is paints a picture in itself!
Admin  
#22 Posted : 02 March 2006 10:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin Keeler Would it be Environmental Health Officer?
Admin  
#23 Posted : 02 March 2006 11:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Thompson CMIOSH Words are a very powerful medium and when using them one has to consider their impact and be mindful that people can be offended by the untoward un planned insensetive comment. This is as much a part of being a professional as qualifications skills knowlege and expierience. Beware of un guarded comments as they will do nothing to ease the role of the profession, we are constantly having to battle negative attitudes towards us simply because of the job we do.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 02 March 2006 11:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh Ye Gods! I guessed what EHO meant! I was making a subtle point!! (About using acronyms) Remember my earlier post about reading WHAT I ACTUALLY SAID! I gave my career history there............so DOH! You could see I have never been an EHO. I have been a GSM though........
Admin  
#25 Posted : 02 March 2006 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Longworth "You tend to aquire these skills to an extent during further and higher education and then as your career progresses, but not if you left school, went straight into an apprenticeship and then a trade." Sir John Harvey Jones was obviously in completely the wrong job then
Admin  
#26 Posted : 02 March 2006 12:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Audrey Jones This thread has now been locked. It is considered that some of the later postings are unhelpful and are deviating from the original topic. Audrey Jones, Web Co-ordinator IOSH
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.