Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 June 2006 19:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
I am so so so happy that the jobs pages are going, it will save me loads of angst!

Until we get this H&S profession sorted out we will always be a joke profession.

Not to decry but

working from home / unsupervised / Nebosh Cert / H&S Consultancy / doing H&S Audits for clients blady blady blah

any comments anyone?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 June 2006 20:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charley Farley-Trelawney
So sorry Dave I must strongly disagree with the "joke profession" line.

That we are not!

All the best for your future.

CFT
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 June 2006 22:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Cartridge
Careful Dave,


I sense a "Bundy" moment approaching & we all know where that ends.

I can only speak from my experience, which includes Africa & the Caribbean & then UK, what we achieve here with health & safety is far from a joke.


Four touchdowns

Andy
Admin  
#4 Posted : 28 June 2006 06:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T
No, just can't work out how a page trying to help people get a job can cause you so much angst. I think it is a real shame that companies (not agencies) can't notify people of vacancies on this web site.

Admin  
#5 Posted : 28 June 2006 08:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Max Bancroft
Dave - could you be more specific. Is it because you see the H&S jobs described at the lower end of the scale (shall we say) where it is obvious the person advertising for someone hasn't a clue as to what it takes to be a H&S practitioner and what H&S is really about?
Certainly if we get a tightening up on what is allowed to be put in the SHP (eg stop people insisting on NEBOSH as if getting a MSc in OSH isn't as good) it might stop us being SEEN as not a real profession.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 28 June 2006 08:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
The profession thing again...........we are not at the same level as other professions. IOSH is trying to raise professional status by use of CPD etc and has rejigged membership - good on them.

People will not like me saying this, and I will get personal attacks, but in what other profession could someone with shall we say, minimal education, take a (NEBOSH) certificate, join a professional body, and then call themselves a member of a profession?

Yes they are professional in the sense of making their living form it, but in my eyes not a person with a profession............
Admin  
#7 Posted : 28 June 2006 08:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Max Bancroft
Garyh - IOSH is not so different from the Royal Society of Chemistry. It has Affiliates for those who are interested in Chemistry or studying it, Members (who can use the designation MRSC) for those who have graduated or equivalent in Chemistry (probably equivalent to Tech IOSH) and Chartered Chemists for those who fulfil further criteria - equivalent to CMIOSH. If I were an Affiliate member of the RSC I certainly wouldn't describe myself as a member of the chemistry profession but as an MRSC I certainly would with the understanding that I am not so qualified/competent as someone who can add CChem.

There are, of course, Fellows (FRSC). The equivalences are not exact but it gives us an idea of how another profession sees itself.

We had a talk recently at our AGM from a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. They started off in 1505 as the Barber Surgeons of Edinburgh. They became pure surgeons splitting off from the barbers a century later. I suspect they weren't highly thought of as a profession when they started off but look at surgeons now. Give us another century!
Admin  
#8 Posted : 28 June 2006 09:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Bywater
Hi Dave,

I'm not quite sure how the removal of this page will prevent the type of working that you describe.

There will always be people who are less competent carrying out the work of more competent people and getting away with it. Self regulation which is up and running through CPD and the new membership gradings will eventually weed out the ones we don't need in our profession.

Or am I missing your point?

Regards,
Mark
Admin  
#9 Posted : 28 June 2006 13:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
Dave,

Your point being?

Take care!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 28 June 2006 14:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Walker
Ho Ho Ho

Lots of quals + No experience = incompetent
Not many quals + Lots of experience = incompetent
Tons of quals + Tons of experience = incompetent(sometimes)

Sorry, but it's down to the individual and his/her capabilities like any other profession.

I'll duck and hide now

Andy
Admin  
#11 Posted : 28 June 2006 14:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker
Hi Dave,

I think it will be a shame actually, cos I was going to advertise here.

I passed my NEBOSH Cert last Wednesday and now that I’m a professional safety person, I was planning to set up a consultancy specialising in training people for the touch screen CSCS test so that they can work on building sites knowing all about construction site safety. They will , have the right card to prove it.

Also I was planning to set up a subsidiary (my brother has a transit and his own ladder) removing that white fibre stuff from buildings - have seen someone else doing this and think I can do it much quicker, with far less flaffing around. Evidently there is lots of money to make in this, particularly if you take the white fibre stuff to the council tip in the evening.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 28 June 2006 14:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
Jim,

I think you're going to annoy someone and feel the 'Wrath' of their 'Angst'!

I thought it was funny though!

Take care!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 28 June 2006 16:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin R. Bessant
I am not proposing to stop your fun (yet) but I must remind you all about the IOSH Acceptable Use Guidelines and the need to comply with them.

Martin Bessant - Lead Moderator.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 29 June 2006 14:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
Jim U R a card mate.

Its one of my usual bugbears mate, nothing wrong at all with Cert holders getting into safety but and its a big but! at what level?

Would you use a new cert holder to work from home, unsupervised visiting clients and advising them?

Problem is people are prepared to offer ÂŁ30k for this.

Just realised that 3 of the teams in the WC 1/4 finals are in Scotlands Euro Championship group, oh well look forward to South Africa 2010!
Admin  
#15 Posted : 29 June 2006 14:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
Dave, I am in agreement with you! (There's a first!)

The important point being 'What level'. I tend to train in H & S rather than advise or act as a consultant... it's what I do! I know my own capabilities and levels! I even turn work away (In fact, pass it on to someone who knows more than me on the given subject) if I am not comfortable delivering that particular area of H & S.

In terms of 30K being offered, as we all know, the market decides how much it will pay and as you have mentioned football... how many times do we say... 50k a week... for playing football... it's scandalous!! And yet, that is only led by the 'market' and were I a little more agile, down the right wing, I'd happily take the money!

In terms of my own work, my daily rate fluctuates massively... dependent on market forces! Yes, I have a minimum, but each industry tends to have a ballpark figure and I for one am always happy to negotiate.

Interesting point though, when it comes to qualifications... How many Managers do you know who have absolutely no Management qualifications? They got the job perhaps because a) They had been there a long time, b) They were good at there job... Then fall flat on their face when they are in a management position? Yet by the same token, I know many Managers who do a stirling job!

Take care!
Admin  
#16 Posted : 29 June 2006 14:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Yes,

to a point, but it really does depend on what it is people are going to be doing. Take me, CMIOSH etc etc, so no worries there in my own health and social care setting, but to take a real-life example. We needed a new H&S bod in Retail; it so happened we had a restructure in the function, and there were a couple of displaced people, so we advertised internally first off. The interview was fair, and the applicants were expected to demonstrate an understanding that H&S is more than just 'common sense'. One of the applicants really did very well, he did some research and all by himself came up with something like HSG65 (or as near as you can get in 10 minutes!). So we gave him the job, on a fairly tight leash at first. He's since done IOSH MS (getting over 90% on both bits) and got a Credit in his NEBOSH Cert - both within four months of him starting. It's no surprise though; he has more years of Retail experience than he would like to mention, 17 of them as a fairly senior Retail manager with this organisation, and an MBA to boot. Furthermore, he always took saftey seriously as a general manager, and he cares deeply about people. So yes, competence can be measured in many different ways, but believe me he is well off his leash now and just getting normal supervision from me, and he deserves every penny of what some people would think of as an inflated salary given his possession of a 'mere' NEBOSH Cert,

John
Admin  
#17 Posted : 29 June 2006 14:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Max Bancroft
And presumably, John, doing an NVQ under your supervision that will get him Grad IOSH in a few months time? And Tech IOSH thereafter.

Admin  
#18 Posted : 29 June 2006 15:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Hi Max,

Its whether he wants to as he may well be retiring in a four or five years; though he knows the offer is there,

John
Admin  
#19 Posted : 29 June 2006 15:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson
And again from a different tack - how many industrial safety reps get interested through looking after their fellow workers, get some TUC or equivalent training, and then get the bug to go further?

Is this where the starter enquiries come from on this now to be defunct job page - we all had to come from somewhere no matter what our current opinions are !!

It's the safety rep equivalent of their lowest level NVQ - learn as you go.

Then, at the top, you get the manager who is extremely good at his job, and talks well in safety terms - then can't use a pc and print out any text documents, answer mails, issue works instructions - but he knows the job inside out. Sound familiar ??

How do you define competence? There are SO many ways to show how much knowledge you have in any subject !

Let's face it, we've got 30,000,000 fully abled England managers glued to the tv at the moment, but not one shred of paper qualification to their names - go on, you know, you're out there !

I think that only after an interview, a gut feeling appointment from several good candidates, and a probationary learning curve period of time will let you know if you have picked the right person for the right level of competence in Health and Safety.

How do these people get one way of their first job opportunity ? - This current job page, including any personal mail advice from thread readers to help them define what others may want to read into their requests for work.

I just feel that it's a great shame to lose it, but can understand the IOSH monetary stance.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 29 June 2006 15:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith
Glyn and others,

I would just like to confirm that the Careers Forum is not disappearing and members can still identify that they are seeking work. It just job vacancies, which will not be permitted.
Admin  
#21 Posted : 29 June 2006 15:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
Maybe in 6 months we can ask the question - Who has found work as a result of this forum and if any of then were as a result of being placed by an agency?
Admin  
#22 Posted : 29 June 2006 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith
Dave,

I acquired my current position via an agency that initially traced me via this source.
Admin  
#23 Posted : 29 June 2006 16:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bunny
I got a temp contract from advertising my services on this page. I have also got a permanent job through an agency that contacted me through my posting on this page.

I don't have a feeling one way or the other about jobs being advertised here but I think I have had more response fom advertsing my services on this page than responding tomadverts on this page (if that makes sense!)

But it's swings and roundabouts really. We all have a variety of good and bad experience.

Admin  
#24 Posted : 29 June 2006 16:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
I personally feel it is a backward step. In the days of communication and net-working, we are closing off a vital link. Who makes these decisions? Not the members, for sure. And does it all come down to lost revenue? I believe so.

I obtain my business from a variety of sources, this forum included, which is why I have signed up with the other website for H & S jobs, kindly posted by a member.

My involvement in these forums will ultimately decline... maybe my membership too if I am not receiving perceived value.

Take care!
Admin  
#25 Posted : 29 June 2006 16:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
So then posting that you are available for work on here is successful as you have demonstated, so then why should people who are looking to offer work get a free ride? As this avenue will still be open to you, agencies and others can see this and if you are any good then it can work
Admin  
#26 Posted : 29 June 2006 17:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kesp
Mr Moderator have you noticed that over a 1000 members have viewed this thread. Incidentally, most threads to do with the closing of the job advertising also generate a great deal of interest. Democratic state indeed.
Admin  
#27 Posted : 29 June 2006 17:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
Because the short term contracts will no longer be advertised!

Have you got something against people earning money Dave?! No offence, but I don't have the luxury of a salary paid month in month out.. But then that's my choice... And I wouldn't change a thing!

Take care!
Admin  
#28 Posted : 29 June 2006 17:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kesp
Sod revenue for the SHP what about IOSH, with the huge amount of people, agencies, members etc using these forums, why doesn’t IOSH open the whole site up and split it into Jobs, Chat, Careers advice, Study. Charge a one off fee to agencies and companies who want to advertise, it does not have to be excessive. Imagine the amount of other companies that would like to advertise there stuff on here! Oh and you could have a page for grumpy old men and women.
Admin  
#29 Posted : 30 June 2006 08:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Max Bancroft
Is everybody making their views known to an IOSH Council member near them? Next meeting is in Sept.

IOSH (by which I mean Council which is the governing body and which is elected by all the Coporate members and soon will be elected by all members Corporate and non-corporate) has to balance a variety of things.

In this case possible loss of revenue to SHP which is a service to members and which would then cost more i.e. increase in subs to all the membership against the possibility of jobs/work for some members who are on the lookout via this forum and who don't have an alternative.

As an ordinary member I feel for my colleagues who are on the lookout and would be willing to pay a wee bit more in subs but then I know an awful lot who grumble every time there is an increase in subs. Basically all they want is the letters after their name at minimum cost - Branch meetings, (Specialist) Groups, Chat forums, contributing to Govt policy via ConDocs, being the thought leader in H&S etc just pass them by.
Admin  
#30 Posted : 30 June 2006 11:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By BeSafe
I'm not glad the jobs page is going, but I can think of something positive to come out of it. There are two large consultancies that have advertised on this forum quite regularly and who will remain anonymous, although at least one boasts about how they have recruited here. Have you guessed who it is yet?!They may have recruited a few people but have also undoubtedly interviewed many many more (you may say a level up from the so called "CV-trawlers"!)and never provided any post interview response or feedback. Professional time wasters.
And no, not sour grapes, I'm quite happily employed, thank-you! I've heard this from both colleagues in the industry and agencies. I'm sure there are people reading this who have either experienced these consultancies or know exactly who they are!
Admin  
#31 Posted : 30 June 2006 15:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AHS
I feel its a shame try this new site http://hsejobs.proboards92.com Hopefully IOSH will realise that the SHP has no answers for the self employed consultant who gets a couple of days here and there.
Admin  
#32 Posted : 30 June 2006 15:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
I do not think that the people who have been getting this 'free' service have actually 'got it'.

Would you be allowed to put an advert in the local paper for free? Advertise on Radio for free? get a free telly ad?

Remember this is a NOT FOR PROFIT Organisation and relies on the revenue it can generate from subs etc to survive so why should anybody be allowed to advertise for nothing.

If it was your www and it affected your revenue would you allow it without getting some benefit?
Admin  
#33 Posted : 30 June 2006 15:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gary IMD(UK)
I can advertise anything in my local paper under 'Free Ads'... for nothing! (Maybe that's why they call them free ads)?? For the benefit of the community!

NON PROFIT MAKING? Why is it that the main reason is that revenue is being lost via SHP? The majority of smaller consultants, etc who 'advertise' on here currently would never afford some rates in a national magazine... therefore wouldn't do it!

I thought IOSH was a members institute, for the benefit of members?

For some reason, which escapes me, you don't like other people earning Dave, do you?! Have a great weekend!

Take care!
Admin  
#34 Posted : 30 June 2006 16:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Joel Frorath
Andy

Quite agree with you on that score, anybody can get an "Ology" these days in practically anything, that can mean dilly squat at the end of the day, its as you said how you apply yourself at the job is what counts. I am certainly not knocking qualifications but I have always believed knowledge, experience and application is more important not just a few letters after your name, anybody can do that, just look at the state of O + A Levels - 6 for the price of 1 these days!

Should I hide myself now or am I safe now that its late Friday afternoon, football approaching, people will have forgot all about it by tomorrow!!
Admin  
#35 Posted : 30 June 2006 16:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
OK fair point but thats what budgets are for, There is nothing to stop people advertising that they are available for work its about peopel having free advertising when they really should be paying for it.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (8)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.