Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 10 April 2008 11:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard_Sams Hi, It is apparent that there is far more availability of courses to enable someone from a design background to become qualified in health and safety than vice versa. In order for someone to be deemed competent to deliver the CDMC service as an individual, they are expected to demonstrate a suitable level of knowledge in design, health and safety and the construction process. Does anyone know of some suitable design course options for individuals that already have knowledge of the construction process, significant health and safety qualifications but require design knowledge without going as far as becoming a qualified to degree or diploma level in architecture or engineering? Thanks in advance Richard
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 April 2008 00:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By SJA Richard Unfortunately you cannot just attend a short course and gain the necessary experience and knowledge, it takes years of full time study followed by many many years of practical experience to gain the knowledge that you are looking for. I have had to mentor many graduate engineers during my career and even after two or three years many of the most able graduates would still have limited knowledge and experience in this respect and it really annoys me when people think that they can effectively purchase this kind of knowledge and experience! Steve
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 April 2008 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard_Sams Thanks for that Steve and I take your point completely. All professions require long periods of study and years of experience before an individual can be deemed competent. My interest is in the different approaches for training someone to become a CDMC. For almost all professions there are structured academic routes which when combined with the relevant experience enables one to operate at a defined level of competency. As the role of CDMC is a very new role there are as yet no structured routes into the profession. Instead one often finds CDMCs that are health and safety practitioners with little or no design qualifications and experience, or CDMCs from a design background with no little or no health and safety qualifications or experience. There are however a number of health and safety qualifications available to someone from a design background so that they may move some way toward meeting the criteria for a competent CDMC. On the other hand there isn't such as abundance of design courses available to health and safety practitioners. Just as architects, engineers etc are not expected to hold a BSc or Diploma in Health and Safety in order to practice as a CDMC it is not necessary for someone who holds a BSc in Health & Safety to then go as far as to study a degree in architecture or engineering. If you take a young inexperienced individual in terms of CDMC delivery, who is qualified to BSc level in Health & Safety, has experience in the construction industry but little or no experience or education in civil/structural/M&E design, what would be a good starting point in terms of a design related course that can be incorporated into a training programme to compliment experience gained by working along side other CDMCs? Regards Richard
Admin  
#4 Posted : 11 April 2008 12:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By willhiem richard, good question, i've often wondered about that myself. doesnt seem to be a lot out there, its pretty easy do a diploma or a masters in H & S but try doing that in engineering or design and you'd spend 2 years or more!!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 11 April 2008 13:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel Its still the case that H&S is seen as being less professional than other professions' hence a designer, farmer, fisherman, marketing manager, HR manager, lawyer, etc can move to H&S easier than a H&S person can move in the opposite direction! I have great respect for the CDMC's [I have acted as a PS in the past on large complex jobs] for those that I know however it is the case that there are many designers out there who have the most basic design qualifications and basic H&S qua-lies but are operating on large complex sites as CDMC's and are more respected by clients as a CDMC via design can show the CDM guidance to a client to prove where the regs place a designer but a H&S professional is not mentioned in the regs so they cannot impress the client in the same way! Additionally there are many H&S professionals who are expert in many areas but not construction so I advise all those in that situation to obtain competence and or call on support as needed On an underground job that I recently appraised neither the CDMC nor the H&S adviser had any experience of underground plant rooms, especially the M&E areas, so you can see where they were going yet both had glamorous business cards
Admin  
#6 Posted : 11 April 2008 14:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lance Hi It is an interesting point. I work as a CDM-C and know many other CDM-C's working for a wide range of companies and no two have the same qualifications. I have spent many an evening over the past few months discussing the role of CDM-C. In my opinion the requirements for construction/design and an understanding of law all outweigh that of H&S. I think too many CDM-C's get bogged down advising the design teams on H&S matters which our esteemed H&S colleagues working for contractors can deal with. The role of CDM-C is very much about controlling a process in a proactive way and trying to get people (designers!) thinking and talking about hazard elimination before you reach site. Back to the point though, there are loads of colleges and universities around that provide a wide range of construction courses with design elements etc. It is daft to suggest all CDM-C's need to be architects or engineers, it is the design process you need to understand. I would suggest doing a part time HND in a construction related subject with an element of design? Keep at it as this role has got some fantastic opportunities especially for people at graduate level as there are so few going into it. I do get frustrated with the APS, as they are not keen to allow graduates to become members even if you pass their entrance point scoring system, personally I think that membership of IOSH and CIOB or RICS is a robust way of demonstrating your competence on top of experience. So try and get a course which is accredited by CIOB or RICS and start working towards full membership. Hope that is of some help. L
Admin  
#7 Posted : 11 April 2008 15:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By willhiem would the formulation of a programme of study for such a role not be totally justified by now. I dont think a lot of designers understand the role and think once they stick in a few anchor points on a roof its safe yet you could have ten people up there in a week!! aesthetics still take precedence over safety in their minds, safety is still an after thought!!
Admin  
#8 Posted : 11 April 2008 15:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lance I agree completely. I am told everyday by designers how important safety is to them and that access strategies will be an inherent part of the design etc etc etc, but in realty it is always a "bolt-on". The lack of understanding of the purpose of CDM or even what it is (a common question)by designers of all types is chronic, there are some excellent ones but all too many who don't care.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 11 April 2008 15:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By willhiem not sure exactly but a cdmc cant actually specify changed to be made because then they become liable to be classed as designers, the role is still a little vague, its a general policing job of asking oh did you think of / do that or what are the plans for this etc. so control is pretty minimal!!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 11 April 2008 15:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lance Indeed, the biggest issue with CDM 2007 is that is didn't give the CDM-C any additional influence. It is a tricky job to undertake and basically ends up ensuring the client fulfills his duties. The input into the design is minimal, hence my point about not needing to be an architect etc. You are really there to instigate discussions and a review of plans relating to hazard elimination. There is certainly scope for a specific university course as the career prospects are great and salaries can be very good.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 11 April 2008 15:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By willhiem indeed, we seem to agree on the same points. client or PM's though still dont recognise such roles and in some cases i thin designers feel agrieved that they are out of the loop with this and therefore turn a blind eye to it and think they still have ultimate control. it will take a hard line approach or else in build it into a manditory cpd for them before they realise what they have to do. but thatcould result in developing a know it all sense!! so still a few issues to be ironed out i reckon
Admin  
#12 Posted : 11 April 2008 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith As many of you are aware, I work as a CDM-C within an architectural practice, however when we are not appointed for this role, the feedback I often get from my design colleagues is that they never ever get to speak to this person.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 11 April 2008 17:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Carl West Just going back to the original question, Maybe take a design qualification to compliment your H&S quals ?
Admin  
#14 Posted : 11 April 2008 19:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Marie Louise Hi Richard, Have you looked in to the CITB Site Management Safety Training Scheme 5 day course it's listed in table 3 for MaPS. Hope I've got this right as I'm thinking of heading this way to. For MaPS you need as a minimum, 2 points in either table 1 (Design) or 3 (Construction) if yor main qualification is in H&S. Sure I'll be corrected. Marie
Admin  
#15 Posted : 12 April 2008 18:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By James M The trouble is that you can qualify to be RMaPS and NOT comply with the CDM ACOP. To get your MaPS registered member qualification under the new scheme, you need 2 points in H&S. The CSCS touch screen test and a one day scaffold inspection course gets you this. The CDM ACOP states on page 50 para 231 and appendix 4 page 111 that for individual competency for a CDM C you are expected to hold a NEBOSH construction certificate or equivalent. I don't know of an equivalent qualification so NEBOSH construction cert is it. It would be interesting to see the outcome of a court case where the CDM C relies on his RMaPS qualification verses the CDM ACOP regarding individual competency.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 18 April 2008 20:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Having read the responses and your original question, I thought that perhaps you ought to explore the opportunities offered in local Colleges on ONC/HNC/HND course in civils or building construction. Most of these course cover and include use of software design packages commonly used in the real world, and learning this way (perhaps on day release or evenings depending on what the Colleges offer) offers both an excellent means of CET/CPD and the opportunity to develop skills in the area your looking at. As has been stated in the other responses, unfortunately there is no quick fix, and any of these courses will take between 1 and 2 years to complete depending on the type of study.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.