Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 June 2008 07:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DJ Graham Hi folks Daft question but I have to ask quickly before my funding goes down the pan. I have the NEBOSH Gen Cert and a lot of the job adverts I see want the Construction Cert. If I opt for this course does it add any value to what I already have or am I just repeating stuff and wasting course money? Or is there lots of new specialised material that will add value to my CPD? Any advice/guidance appreciated. Many thanks.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 June 2008 08:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT You won't need to take the management paper again, assuming you did the NGC recently, so it will be practical and hazard paper; yes, it is quite different and whilst principles will be the same teh content is not. If construction 'type' work is calling you then if you have the opportunity go for it. CPD wise is a matter for you to decide the value. CFT
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 June 2008 09:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DJ Graham Many thanks CFT. My NEBOSH Gen cert is dated 2005 so I may benefit froma good update I think. Based on your reply it may be worthwhile and not just duplication of something I already hold. My interest in the construction qual is simply because it will assist me in the engineering world. LOLER/PUWER/SSoW etc... and if I dont do a course soon I will lose the funding :) Thanks again :)
Admin  
#4 Posted : 11 June 2008 10:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT I don't really feel it will be overly beneficial for engineering purposes, but who knows if it is available and paid for then go for it; it's a bit like your diary and development section within CPD, you need to re-visit because you just never know what opportunities are around that very next corner and changes become necessary! All the best CFT
Admin  
#5 Posted : 11 June 2008 12:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson I would go for it even from an engineering background, as often structural engineers are asked to put in calculations ready for groundworks for machine pads, hoists, lifting equipment for engineers on sites. The more that you know about the whole process, the better any risk assessment based around the work will be, especially in areas around the installation, commissioning procedures, use of completed equipment etc etc. All material knowledge is good and would enhance your job and current work prospects. It would also make it easier when inspections of work based activities are done pre / mid / post job being done. You cannot be blinded by science if you have a good, basic, or all round knowledge of construction techniques and materials. From the perspective of your employer getting good value for money and good safe standards of workmanship, this makes sense.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 June 2008 14:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mr Adrian D Everett If you want to be a CDM Co-ordinator you will need the Construction Certificate. Check the CDM April 2007 ACOP!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 10 July 2008 16:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Zoe Smith I agree that a NEBOSH Construction will assist if you are looking for CDM or Construction biased roles. Some clients of mine also like it for Civil engineering projects as well. Always good to have as if you go for a role most clients in the specific industry will choos someone with a Specific NEBOSH rather than General.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.