Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard
Like many of us I am the secretary of our Safety Committee. At a recent meeting I also took the chair as the regular chair was missing. During this meeting I made some adverse comments about senior management's dedication to health and safety, which I duly recorded in the minutes.
I have now been told that this was the wrong forum for such a complaint (which I don't agree with anyway) and these comments should be removed.
My view is that wrong forum or not, these comments were made at the meeting, and must therefore appear in the minutes. I have refused to remove them.
Comments please. I have eighteen months to retirement so am not too bothered about fallout!
Richard
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Sean Stephenson
Richard,
I totally agree with you. The safety committee is exactly the right forum to discuss issues like this. The committee that I sit on regularly discusses management committment to health and safety, in fact we publish a yearly health and safety action plan, which this year has management committment as one of the major focuses.
All I would say is that if you feel the issue is important, which clearly it is, then stick to your guns!
Good luck
Sean
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Diane Warne
Richard,
Another point - what does your organisation see as the function of minutes? Generally they are supposed to be a true record of what was said at the meeting. So if something appears in the minutes that is inaccurate, the members have a right to have it removed. If it's accurate however, it should stay in, unless it was agreed at the meeting that the comments were off-the-record. It's very dangerous to start letting people manipulating minutes of meetings because they don't want things that were said (ON the record) to be recorded. The ultimate decision, of course, rests with..... the Chairman!
Regards
Diane
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Marie T
Hi Richard,
I think that it was a rather bold move on your part. If your written statements in the meeting were clearly accurate and pertained to what was said in the meeting, most definately write it down.
I'm currently in my last year studying Occupatoinal Health and Safety. During my short work experience, I have already witnessed supervisors and employees "afraid" to say how they truly feel in fear of losing their jobs. What ashame.
If senior management does not show committment to safety by attending a simple meeting, how are they going to deal with other safety tasks within the company !
I assumed you could have played the political game and not written your comments, but how fun would that have been. It will be interesting to see if your comments affect the company. Keep us posted.
Good luck!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stuart Nagle
Richard.
I admire your tenacity in refusing to have these matters removed form the minutes, no doubt reinforced by your imminent retirement !!
I would think that the 'comments' (made by management perhaps?)to which you refer on the removal of the comments is probably due to two things;
a) hitting a raw nerve, and
b) being put in a place (the minutes of an open meeting) where those comments are available to a wider audience and a response was not able to be made in defence or argument !!
Looking at it from the management point of view, I would hazard to guess that the 'Chair' you were standing in for, probably has recourse to a higher level 'Management' meeting, which I would assume is judged to be where the management (from their prospective) feels the issue should have been raised/discussed.
Whilst I am not one for sweeping matters under the carpet myself, I also know, as a senior officer in my company, that there are issues that are best discussed, and often best results obtained, when discussed in the right forum. In all cases, 'opinions' - if this was the case - are best kept as that and such comments made off the record at any meeting where the level of meeting or committee does not have either the remit, or perhaps the power to action those items.
Perhaps the issue may have been best served by reporting that there were (whatever)concerns, and asking for the matter to be tabled for a (more senior) management meeting to review, where perhaps you may have been invited to further quanitify the issues/matters of concern raised.
I know it's all politics, but this is why in most companies there is a hierachy and structure to management, and as you rightly know by your reference to retirement, no one likes people to step outside this structure when it is considered that there is a method/forum for dealing with such issues.
I hope you able to review and reflect upon the matters/issues and resolve them, but perhaps consider the wider implications and the steps, perhaps, that may have been the right/prefered route to bringing the issues into a discussion/meeting in order that they could be dealt with without causing conflict (and reducing stress of course).
Good luck...
Stuart Nagle
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Frank Cooper
Richard,
I am inclined to agree with Stuart.
Also, I wonder if those sentiments would have been expressed and minuted had the usual Chairman been at that meeting?
I suppose I am lucky in a sense because my MD (who I report directly to) chairs our meetings and is quite happy to deal with issues that I am sure, in some companies, would be swept under the carpet.
From experience, I do not like to see issues raised that are aimed at particular groups of people or individuals (usually somewhere up the management chain) when they do not have the opportunity to respond to them at that forum at that time.
An invitation to a senior manager to deal with specific issues is one way around it. If that doesn't happen then the issues should be raised in writing on behalf of the committee.
Career limiting it may be in some companies but the need to be able to get issues into the open is essential when they relate to the health and safety of individuals.They should however only deal with fact and not the supposition that nobody at the higher cares. However, experience again tells me that sometimes such issues do not always have a lot to do with H&S but people may just use H&S as a route to raise other grievances.
Yes, as Stuart says, there is a lot of politics in all this but where company protocol exists for raising issues to a higher level then it should be followed.
Whatever happens, enjoy your retirement.
Frank Cooper
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard
Points accepted. However, the matters referred to have been ongoing since September 1999, and have been constantly referred to management, both by the Committee and by outside accreditation bodies to which we are subject.
The same statement was also made by me at the June meeting last year, under the normal chairman, and was accepted and published!!
I am not deliberately bloody minded, and have exhausted the normal channels of communication. I was hoping a bit of in house publicity might get results, and also head off a formal complaint to HSE which some members of staff (not me - never awaken a sleeping tiger!)have postulated.
Thanks for the responses, the struggle continues
Peace, Brothers (and Sisters)!
Richard
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.