Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 August 2001 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Breen does anyone know if there is a limit to how much weight a person would be allowed to carry depending of course on the persons weight/height and fitness etc:?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 August 2001 11:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Alan How long is a piece of string? The HSE guidance for heavy building blocks puts a figure of 20kg for an individual to place on a wall, above this 2 operatives are required. I remember also the push to 25kg cement and plaster bags. Some of the early HSE guidance to the Manual Handling regs in 1993 suggested 25kg at waist height and close to the body. This reduced when stooping or reaching up was required, also with distance from the body. It is a useful start point in my mind. Bob
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 August 2001 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick Higginson Alan, There is no weight limit for anyone. The Manual Handling Operations Regs 1992 require employers to: 1. Avoid Manual Handling wherever possible 2. Carry out a risk assessment on any manual handling hazards that remain 3. Reduce risks to lowest levels reasonably practicable There are some weight limits quoted in an appendix at the back, but these are based on operations of 30 times an hour, and are not maximum weight limits, as many people seem to believe. Drop me an e-mail if you would like some more help. I do have a couple of sample electronic MH RA forms I could send if you want. Regards, Nick
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 August 2001 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Breen Thanks a lot Bob,I know it was a slightly obscure question,but a friend of mine is an insurance assessor and she asked if I could try and find some info on this subject.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 August 2001 20:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Neil Budworth Just for info the HSE have published a leaflet called handling the news, which is suggesting a limit of 18kg moving to 17kg for newspaper bundles. Regards Neil
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 August 2001 08:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jack Re Nicks posting, the figures in the Appendix of the HSE Guidance (L23) are NOT weight limits they are basic guideline figures for identifying when manual lifting and lowering operations may not need a detailed assessment (it says here). And they are for relatively infrequent operations - UP TO 30 operations per hour.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 21 August 2001 08:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick Higginson Isn't that what I said?
Admin  
#8 Posted : 21 August 2001 09:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Nick You missed the UP TO Bob
Admin  
#9 Posted : 21 August 2001 10:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick Higginson Bob, Many thanks, how could I have been so shortsighted? Fear not, I will grab the copy of the regs and quote chapter and verse from now on. At least I can be safe in the knowledge that Jack is there to point out the error of my ways. Nick
Admin  
#10 Posted : 21 August 2001 10:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick Higginson RE Jack's first statement: Could I just point out the inaccuracies here as Jack has mentioned a Manual "lifting or lowering" operation. The precise definition of Manual Handling is "Any transporting or supporting of a load (including the lifting, putting down, pushing, pulling, carrying or moving thereof) by hand or by bodily force". (Regulation 2(1) on page 6 of the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (L23) ISBN No. 0-7176-2415-3. Therefore Jack's definition was not all encompassing. Nick
Admin  
#11 Posted : 21 August 2001 11:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jack Fortunately Nick, Jack is still here to point out the error of your ways. If you re-read his earlier posting you will see he was specifically talking about THE FIGURES IN THE APPENDIX of the HSE GUIDANCE (L23) and when he said: they are basic guideline figures for identifying when manual lifting and lowering operations may not need a detailed assessment, he was quoting DIRECTLY from L23 page 43 Para 7!! Further on in the guidance you can find information about other manual handling guidance eg carrying, pushing, pulling and even handling while seated.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 21 August 2001 11:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Keith Archer. Alan, As other respondents have pointed out there is plenty of information about on Manual Handling but the golden rule on lifting is always lift within your own capacity. Hope this helps, Keith
Admin  
#13 Posted : 21 August 2001 18:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brian Dawson I've been watching this thread develop with some amusement. Nick you seem to have taken exception to being "corrected" by Jack. That to me is one of the strengths of this forum. I know it can be irritating - and why doesn't he give his full name? - but it can also be valuable, especially if you are working towards qualifications. In fact, I think Jack was making a valid point. In your initial response your first two paragraphs made the point that there are no weight limits. Then you said the appendix quoted some weight limits. Jack was saying they are not weight limits they are guidelines to determine whether a detailed assessment is necessary. You also confused the issue by referring to these weight limits only applying for 30 operations per hour. You therefore seemed to be implying that there were weight limits but they only applied when you were repeating the operation 30 times an hour. I know you didn't mean that but I also think it was reasonable for Jack to clarify the point. I do not think he was any more pedantic than quite a number of responses to this forum including some of your own (indeed wasn't there one today where you even apologised for pedantry and managed to critise Jacks into the bargain? He must have really got to you!) All the best Brian
Admin  
#14 Posted : 21 August 2001 19:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By STEVE Jack Your the man! I have noticed over a period of time how Nick feels he has to correct peoples mistakes or errors to which there is nothing wrong with that,but what he also feels he needs to do is belittle them aswell. Not very good for a Safety Person To gain respect you have to give a little,there is nothing wrong in trying to impress if thats what you feel you have to do but not on other persons errors. Maybe this is not taught in the Nebosh paper format welcome to the real world Steve
Admin  
#15 Posted : 21 August 2001 22:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lee Bennett Dear All, Over the last few days I have been reading the postings on these forums. Most of the questions were quite legitimate and some responses were sarcastic, pedantic, nit picking, and at times puerile. Even I recieved an email saying I should watch my tone from a user of this forum. Is there something in the water ? Is it because we have lost the Ashes ? Or is it just the lack of sun ? Once upon a time these forums were informative and sometimes humourous what went wrong ? No wonder regular contributors are leaving in droves. So come on people if it is reasonably practicable, lets get on with the main objective to make our workplaces safe and healthy, even safety people need to laugh now and again. "I have opinions of my own - strong opinions - but I don't always agree with them." President George Bush
Admin  
#16 Posted : 22 August 2001 07:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nick Higginson Gents, I tjought me and Jack were just having a bit of fun - apologies if anyone has taken it in a way other than it was meant. Brian you are exactly right in that by the thread developing, we have arrived at the correct advice. I sometimes type to quickly without thinking of the wordage I am using, and although I knew exactly what I meant with regards to the guidelines in the appendix, it didn't come out as I meant it! As for warning e-mails, I'm not sure what that's all about. The only really disappointing comments are Steve's derogatory remarks, which I don't intend to get involved in. Once again, apologies if I was misunderstood. Nick
Admin  
#17 Posted : 22 August 2001 08:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jack Yes, things seem to have got a bit serious overnight; is that when the grown ups log on?
Admin  
#18 Posted : 22 August 2001 12:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Breen Hi everybody,it`s Alan here again...first of all thanks to you all for such a great laugh on my very first question on a forum.........secondly,thanks to Nick for the e-mail,and thirdly .Lee,we may have lost the ashes,but what a great victory at Headingly....... many thanks to you ALL Alan 22/08/2001
Users browsing this topic
Guest (6)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.