Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 February 2002 15:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nicki We recently had an accident/incident which is giving me a great deal of concern and raises one question, should I have done more to prevent this? Basically, one of our employees stopped at a motorway services to re-fill the windscreen washer bottle. He purchsed a windscreen additive at the services and in the process of adding this to his car, high winds blew it into his eyes. To make matters worse he stumbled backwards and was hit by another car, resulting in a broken arm. All of our drivers are given a basic vehicle safety course i.e. checks of fluid levels etc. My concern is should we have included windscreen washer in our CoSHH assessments or send the car into a garage for the most minor service requirement, which sounds unpratical to me. At what point does common sense take over from fully documented risk assessments and method statements? Regards Nicki
Admin  
#2 Posted : 03 February 2002 18:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Moody What would your COSHH assessment have said if it had been done ? "Do not use in high winds" ? I think you are fretting too much about the screen wash and not considering the driver of the car who ran over your employee. What did his risk assessment say ?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 February 2002 13:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David .J. Minnery Nicki, I do not think that you or the employer could be in anyway responsible for high winds , even if your employee was taking great care as to what he was doing it was a "freak accident", windscreen washer bottles sometimes require to be filled several times a day ,depending on conditions, so your employee was living up to his training and complying with the law [by filling up the windscreen washer bottle]. I would be more concerned about the speed and awareness of the other driver in or around a forecourt area , ask the garage if it was captured by their cctv system and ask for a copy , ask the police if they have seen the cctv tape? I hope your employee is alright . I do not think that your risk assessment would have shown this type of incident up anyway , what do you do supply goggles to everyone filling the windscreen washer bottles and how would you enforce this? maybe you could now supply small funnels to avoid any future problem . Regards David
Admin  
#4 Posted : 04 February 2002 13:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Hi Nicki, My first thoughts were, pre-use checks, I am sure that you have them and they are documented. Did be carry them out on that day. Should you have twice daily checks, perfomed in a controlled environment where possible. At least one can be done at home/base. It is interesting to note that a driver may need to fill a washer bottle several times a day, I assume that is correct.because I cannot speak from (industry) experience. If multiple daily refills are necessary and if drivers wear gloves to fill diesel, could they were safety glasses when re-filling screen-wash/brake fluid etc etc. Regards Andrew
Admin  
#5 Posted : 04 February 2002 20:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Nicki The ACoP for the Management Regs states that employers are expected to take reasonable steps to help themselves identify risks. While you might reasonably anticipate the risk of skin contact (and thus you must consider what needs to be done to control it), is eye contact with windscreen washer liquid reasonably foreseeable? I would say that it is not although I might have to revise my opinion in the light of your employee's experience. Regards Paul
Admin  
#6 Posted : 05 February 2002 09:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie Nicki If you had done a COSHH assessment you would, presumably, have used the manufacturer's safety data sheet. It is extremely unlikely that this would have recommended wearing eye protection when adding to the washer tank Laurie
Admin  
#7 Posted : 05 February 2002 11:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brendan Meyler Nikki, Firstly thankyou for bring this case to the attention of the forum. I for one would have never foreseen this incident/accident. Comments like the one posted by Jane Moody are Not Helpful, as this is a discussion forum with a view to providing constructive information for all questions. I hope this does not put you off using the forum again. Regards Brendan
Admin  
#8 Posted : 05 February 2002 12:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nicky Firstly Brendan was a bit hard on Jane, it is a discussion forum. Secondly, I am the "jobsworth" that has covered screenwash in a CoSHH assessment. Gloves and goggles for the vehicle maintenance staff when using undiluted screenwash. The main thing is to learn from this. How about pre-drive checks (already suggested), and pre-diluted screen wash to be supplied and carried in the vehicle? Nicky
Admin  
#9 Posted : 05 February 2002 19:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nicki All, thanks for all your comments about this incident. As a footnote the driver of the other vehicle was a "member of the public". The police are not taking any action against him. On my way home stopped to fill my own car's, not a company car, washer bottle. The screen wash I purchased has lots of detail about mixing strengths etc but not a single word about and safety risks. I would have thought a caution about not drinking and contact with eyes should have been mentioned!!! Kind Regards Nicki
Admin  
#10 Posted : 05 February 2002 22:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Bennett Nikki, When I first read your message and the responses the first thing that pops in to my mind was this. As an owner of a vehicle I would class the filling the water bottle on my own vehicle or that of my employers as "a routine activity that is associated with life in general" and I draw you attention to section 13 and sub-section 13a of the Management of Health and Safety at work Regulations 1999. My interpretation could be wrong and good debate on this subject would be helpful. Regards, John
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.