Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ged
Hi everybody can anybody help me out with this one. Firm has a builiding very old and it is full of asbestos boarding. It is now well passed the sell by and new premises have been found. However there is still some equipment in the building that has to be maintained periodically. Everything that is screwed down etc has been left within the building to prevent accidental breakage of the asbestos boarding. The building will be boarded up and locked etc and it is within a compound.
Question
1..If kids break in etc and vandalise are we responsible?
2..Is there a need for a permit to work for the engineers doing the periodical maintenance?
Hopefully question two will also be resolved in the near future when a new site can be found for this equipment.
Cheers for now
Ged
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ashley Williams
I recently attended a HSE presentation on the topic of managing Asbestos and the new duties. A similar question was raised at the time and the answer was "If you occupy the premises you are responsible for the Asbestos". This was demonstrated with an example of the problems a local council was having, after identifying all asbestos in schools and labelling it up the kids were deliberately smashing panels to get the school closed for the day!
Risk assess the periodic maintence work, then decide on your control measures it may be you need a safe system of work and permits to work or you may just decide on some other form of contact.
Ash
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Nick Higginson
Ged,
Under Criminal Law, HSWA74 Section 4 places responsibilities on anyone in control of premises.
Under Civil Law, Occupiers Liability Act 1957 and 1984 place duties on persons in control of premises. 1984 gives duties with regards to trespassers. SIgns warning of the danger are unlikely to discharge your duties as far as children are concerned, so other measures will be necessary.
If you are aware that trespass is likely (and you obviously are, hence your message) then you certainly do have duties whilst you still retain some control over the premises.
Regards,
Nick
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ged
Ashley and Nick thanks very much for the reply it is as suspected, matter now being worked on for the near future. Thanks again for your help and advice.
Ged
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martin Allan
Question one the answer is "Yes" as others have indicated.
Question two The answer is "Yes" if you want to put yourself in a suitably justifiable position, as having provided clear unambiguous instruction to those who will be undertaking the work. Such instruction/methods of work should be used if they will improve control and further the safety of the persons involved.
If it only provides a record that clear instructions were given and helps reinforce the importance of taking care and reporting damage to suspect materials it is probably woth using such a permit system.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Martin Allan
Question one; the answer is "Yes" as others have indicated.
Question two; the answer is "Yes" if you want to put yourself in a suitably justifiable position, as having provided clear unambiguous instruction to those who will be undertaking the work. Such instruction/methods of work should be used if they will improve control and further the safety of the persons involved.
If it only provides a record that clear instructions were given and helps reinforce the importance of taking care and reporting damage to suspect materials it is probably worth using such a permit system.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.