Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 02 May 2002 10:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Woods To cut a long story short a printer has waist length hair which is tied back pony tail style. There is concern that it may become entangled in machinery. He rufuses to wear a hat or hairnet. Any suggestions on legislation or from personal experiance would be appreciated. Robert Woods
Admin  
#2 Posted : 02 May 2002 12:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Clifton Hi Robert. I am presuming that as a result of a risk assessment you have identified the danger of entanglement in moving parts of machinery. The wearing of a hat or hairnet is a method of controlling the risk and under HASWA 1974 employees have a duty to co-operate with employers who have the legal duty to identify and reduce risk of injuries. An alternative track may be to ask the employee to put his ponytail inside the back of his shirt/overalls provided this does not restrict his movements. Good luck. Adrian.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 02 May 2002 13:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tim You could just sack him!
Admin  
#4 Posted : 03 May 2002 11:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard It is an offence not to cooperate with an employer in regard to measures which may be necessary for that employer to comply with health and safety legislation (HASAWA Sect 7) Richard
Admin  
#5 Posted : 03 May 2002 13:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Robert, I completely agree with previous responses. You are making a reasonable request for an obvious hazard. He is in breach of Section 7, no question. Hopefully you HR dept will advise on any tricky employment law. You may have to informal warn, first written etc. However, it is implied in the contract of employment, (whether verbal or not) to comply with section 7 and this may count as gross misconduct resulting in instant dismissal. I do not think that this person would hesitate for a second to put in an industrial injury claim. Why shouldn’t an employer also take the necessary action? Regards Andy.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.