Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 November 2002 12:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Dear all, Do you record ULD's as accidents, and record them in your accident book and statistics, or not record until they are reportable? Any comments of discussion would be appreciated. Andrew.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 November 2002 12:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jo Scott Smith Bearing in mind that the statutory purpose of an accident book is to record accidents that may later turn into claims for sate disability and disablement benefit then I would say yes they should be recorded. Certainly they need to be reported in some way so that preventative action can be taken promptly and permanent injury avoided. Granted that the information requested in the accident book is not all that helpful for incidents such as these where the damage happens over a period of time rather than one critical incident (stress would be another example). For this and other reasons to do with recording preventative measures taken and getting better accident statistics we are in the process of formulating our own accident/incident reporting system. Hope this helps
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 November 2002 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Andy I presume you mean Work Related ULDs. In which case by definitionn these are the result of repetitive injury and cannot be defined as an accident - Thus they are they are recordable as an accident. However you need to record them and analyse as they suggest that your processes may need review, after all if there is an occurrence of WRULD risk assessments need review. Bob
Admin  
#4 Posted : 11 November 2002 14:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Stone I brought this up in another message last week, cramp in the hand or forearms due to repetative movements are reportable under RIDDOR F2508a form section 8.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 12 November 2002 13:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Many thanks for the responses so far ,as always your thoughts are greatly appreciated. Jo, I agree, recorded, although not necessarily in the accident book, and acted on. Robert, you presume correct, could you clarify your response, ? WRULD's are not accidents, not recordable as such but should be recorded in some way and acted on? Ian, Thanks for that, I was referring to internal reporting and recording for acting on investigating, statistics and so on. Regards Andrew
Admin  
#6 Posted : 13 November 2002 10:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Firstly an accident is a specific event in time and WRULD is a chronic injury arising from repetitive acts, normally involving manual and digital dextrity in some form but not always. The accident book is not the place. Due to office moves I cannot at the moment get the guidance to F2508A which is the RIDDOR report for injury such as this and diseases. Occurrences must be reported in the prescribed circumstances. More importantly though such an occurrence may well indicate that an improvement or modification is needed to the work method. A single person with such injury has to be treated as a warning sign. Bob
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 November 2002 10:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Bob, Thanks for the reply. This area seems a little grey! We obviously have to record WRULD's and act on the findings etc, but as to whether it is an accident or not? An accident is an unplanned event leading to loss. Does it differ if it is a number of events? What about acute RSI, I had a chap suffering after a couple of hours work. If he had pulled his back it would have been recorded as an accident. If an UPD, it would not. What is the definitive answer, if there is one our there at all. Thanks for the responses so far, they are appreciated, however, do only 3 people out there have an opinion or knowledge on this?? Regards Andrew
Admin  
#8 Posted : 14 November 2002 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Mains Andy, I cannot give a definitive answer. However, in my organisation we do not use an accident book. Instead we record onto an incident form. This allows incidents and near misses to be recorded along with accidents. Once these have been logged, specific incidents or trends can be investigated. Hope this is of some help to you. David.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 14 November 2002 20:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By sylvia This dilemma (and the mixed views resulting) is one of the reasons the true status of occupational ill-health is so vague. Historically, ill-effects arising from cumulative wear&tear have NOT been reported in the only reference used for "safety" monitoring - the accident book. They are often only reported via a range of medical specialists, and even if the organisation has an occ health service, is it "joined-up" with the safety service for such monitoring? Nowadays as so many larger organisations in particular have amended the concept of 'the accident book' into reporting forms, there is more scope for collating all types of incident and injury / ill-health data from these. My own experience was that ULD / RSI (whatever - aches & pains) were NOT reported except via the OH service, maybe, who treated this as confidential. Then we'd get a solicitors letter, and a very unhappy (often absent for many weeks even) employee. Someone needs to investigate the circumstances of any (alleged) work-related injury - if there is no trigger mechanism for this (as with 'accidents') an organisation is badly placed to defend any claim, should it even come to that. My own organisation - with such a problem - eventually devised a very specific form just for DSE related symptoms. Whilst not an ideal solution especially for those who dislike the 'form for everything' method, it did highlight the issue to managers and staff, and encourage a more integrated approach with the OH service. Surprise, surprise, reported cases increased! After it had been around 3 or 4 years, it was integrated back into the standard incident reporting form, which was more generally worded so as to include such conditions.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 15 November 2002 12:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy David and Sylvia, many thanks. I have a reasonable accident reporting and investigation system after trying a few different forms, however, I do not use an 'incident' form which would cover a wider scope of issues and allow appropriate action to be taken whatever the incident should be. If anyone is willing to e-mail a working copy of an incident report I would be very gratefull. Thanks again for the responses so far. Regards Andrew
Admin  
#11 Posted : 15 November 2002 12:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jo Scott Smith Sylvia I'd be really interested in seeing a copy of the form that you now use to incorp ULD reporting into your accident reporting system. I'm in the process you describe of ditching the accident book and having our own internal reporting. Could you email me a copy please. Thanksyou in anticipation. JO
Admin  
#12 Posted : 18 November 2002 12:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Laurie Andy I have responded by e-mail Laurie
Admin  
#13 Posted : 17 February 2003 12:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Penny We record and monitor ULD's on our dse assessment form. Staff who have ULD's are high risk and are monitored on a regular basis, usually monthly, to make sure their symptoms are not getting worse. They also get referred to our occ health team who visit our site every month. The doctor then sends us a report and advices us on what equipment to give them, i.e wrist rest. Hope this helps.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 17 February 2003 15:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin West It surprises me that WRULDS are reportable on Form F2508a where as back problems (perhaps due to bad posture while using DSE) are not. Is there a reason for this? I have a freind who has just returned to work after two months off sick due to back pain probably due to manual handling at work (her doctors comments, not mine) and yet it isnt 'reportable'. She has suffered nerve damage as a result and is now on continual medication, thus effecting her life (she can no longer drink alcohol and the medication could have effected her driving through drowsiness). Any thoughts? Kev
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.