Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 December 2002 14:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Elliott Having just had the dubious honour of addressing the Board of Directors, the question of "status" of Non Execs. arose. The argument was that they were appointees NOT employees. My gut reaction was to tell them that in terms of HASAW they were classed as employees, any feelings on this?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 December 2002 21:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert M Edwards The legal distinctions are complex and under current consultation with the DTI. The board would argue against them being employees as there are ramifications for PLCs who treat them as such. The NEDs have an independant function on the board which will be outlined in an agreement in compliance with the Companies Act. However your best bet is to consider them in the same way as independant contractors or other 'workers'. Sometimes the term 'employee' causes much debate and we are seeking here to look at matters from the HASAWA. The legal tests for these NEDs so far indicate that as far as H&S goes you need to regard them as employees/workers under the Act. Lime One Ltd 0870 240 4325 www.limeone.com
Admin  
#3 Posted : 19 December 2002 10:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Spiers I agree with Robert but add that in some circumstances could not a NED be regarded as a consultant, giving advice which the company act upon.The questions then would be around wisdom of the board accepting advice,checking competence etc.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 19 December 2002 10:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Bill Presumably, these non-execs have contracts with your organisation. In which case, their status would depend on whether they have contracts of service or contracts for service. I have to admit that I cannot explain the difference but your HR people should be able to. Paul Leadbetter
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.