Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 07 February 2003 15:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Waterton Hi hopefully someone has come accross this before. We are a small local authority social work dep't in darkest scotland. we do not have many service users from ethnic backgrounds. However we anticipate we will have to work with this group in the future. My concern is staff being asked not to wear outdoor shoes in a service users home. We instruct staff that they should always wear suitable foot wear and that under no circumstances should they go bare foot or wear slippers in a service users home. Thus what do we do in instances above. Would wearing plastic type shoe covers as used by staff in swimming pools over shoes be acceptable?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 February 2003 15:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Renny Thomson The plastic covers will not be suitable if maual handling tasks are required due to the slip risk. You can get overshoes that have reasonble grip but a better idea would be a second pair of shoes for indoor use.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 February 2003 19:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi You have not stated what particular aspect of wearing footwear may pose problems. Is it to do with the "leather" in the footwear, which some Hindus would not permit either in the house or more likely, in room(s) where they worship. In that case, non-leather footwear can be a solution. Overshoes will not be a solution as it is the cattle based leather in shoes that Hindu's object to. A variation of this is the "custom" that footwear brings into the house germs & is unhygienic and needs to be kept "seperately"/outside the living areas. These customs were more relevant in the age when public health & sanitation was poor and is not applicable now in developed countries, but for some, the custom carries on regardless. Attitudes will vary dependiong upon the age & background of groups you have referred to. Not all ethinic minorities hold on to these beliefs & customs. It may be better to find out the "reasons" for not allowing footwear from the ethnic minority community based organisations and then devise control measures so that the health & safety of your employees is not compromised.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 12 February 2003 09:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor Has anyone any examples of this issue in practice? Despite working in H&S for many years in inner-city environments, I must admit to never having been presented with the problem where protective footwear was required in domestic property.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.