Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 06 March 2003 15:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Stone If you had some employees who needed to wear safety glasses over their normal glasses for engineering work. Would you supply them or prescription safety glasses ? The staff are complaining that they are uncomfortable and want the prescription ones. Management dont really want to do this. Advice please
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 March 2003 15:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Ian Since the most effective PPE is that which is worn, it may be a false economy to provide non-prescription PPE to those who wear glasses as they will probably not wear it. As PPE must be suitable for the intended use (including suitable for the user), prescription lenses should be provided for those who need them. Paul
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 March 2003 15:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert M Edwards Not to supply PPE with prescription lenses where needed is false econonmy at best and at worst negligent. The wonky unstable two frame set up will not be effective as PPE and we all know how common eye incidents are and how serious they can be.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 March 2003 21:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PatrickT Ian, The provision of PPE as pointed out must be suitable and sufficient. Wave a copy of the PPE / Management Regulations under your bosses nose. It might prove useful to highlight the fact that PPE is to be Risk Assessed once provided. An old addage "you make provision for PPE to fit the person, not make the person fit the provision of the PPE". Just like a dagger, you could always draw upon the punitive costs likely to be incurred, if it is found that the PPE provided failed or was proven to be inadequate. Regards
Admin  
#5 Posted : 07 March 2003 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Ian, From another point of view if you are looking to protect the eyes with these OK would agree, it may be better and more cost effective to provide a 'face shield' as this protects the whole face from impacts.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 10 March 2003 14:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alison Dando I think that the answer to your problem lies in Reg.1 and Reg.3 of the PPE Regs.The hazards and the risks arising from those hazards. Then you will need to consider the fabric of the PPE, the nature of the job, any physical effort by the employees, how long it needs to be worn, requirements for visibility etc. and that it is capable of fitting/adjusting correctly and the state of health of the employees using it. As people come in different shapes and sizes (and wear glasses!)although your final specification (get advice from the technical staff who sell the PPE)may be the same the same item may not be suitable for all your staff i.e you get a selection in and let staff try them.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.