Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John Harrison
What is the legal position if an employee is employed on a process that presents a recognised health risk and refuses to allow a Company Doctor or Nurse to carry out a recognised health monitoring technique e.g. respiratory system check or skin check?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Geoff Burt
Had a similar situation with mercury and operatives refusing to give urine samples. If you email me your telephone number I'm happy to discuss the steps we took.
Geoff
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Leadbetter
John
The legal position is that section 7 of HASAWA requires employees to co-operate with their employer to enable the employer to meet their statutory obligations.
If a risk assessment specifies that health surveillance is necessary, then the employee is obliged to participate. Having said that, invasive techniques for surveillance (such as taking blood samples) should be avoided where possible as there are human rights implications in trying to force these sorts of techniques on an unwilling employee.
Paul
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
John,
As part of this persons T&C of employment if your HR dept is up to scratch then there should be a clause in there to the effect that they have to have screeing but probably not invasive screening.
May need 'Counselling' as to the rationale behind this and the union may need to be consulted.
If as a result he refuses and in the intersets of safety he is not allowed to undertake this work, would he not be in breach of his employment contract?
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.