Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 12 May 2003 15:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martin Clarke Greetings all, My first post after long time lurking ;0) I have recently been made responsible for the above (amoungst other things !) at a local authority borough council. My thoughts are that in previous small civil engineering jobs involving excavation I have dealt with(minor sewer repairs, etc), statutory undertakers undergroung mains records are obtained during the normal planning process (with the exception of emergency works). However, many such nameplates are renewed, re-located, etc during the course of the year. Most are renew's, not new installtions. What are your opinions in obtaining mains records for this type of work given the high volume ? Is it sufficent to CAT scan prior to excavtion. Your comments appreciated.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 12 May 2003 17:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andy Byers Martin, Having been involved in 2 cable strikes, lucky no deaths, I would advice you to go by the guidance 'avoiding underground services'. Whilst underground service plans are not accurate, they will give an indication usually but more importantlt the utilities companies will be alerted to works in the general area. If customers then complain of loss of power etc, they may twig that a mishap has occurred. In our case the electricity board were not aware and went for a reclosure of the circuit which resulted in the site manager being injured. The subsequent investigation highlighted lack of site plans (so no contact numbers to inform utilities) as well as no CAT etc Regards, Andy
Admin  
#3 Posted : 12 May 2003 22:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Martin. Having had similar responsibilities for some years, I can state (lucky perhaps) that no one was ever injured due to a cable strike. The vast majority of the work I undertook was in fact complete replacement of SNP's, mainly due to vehicle accidents or vandalism, and I pioneered outsourcing away from the large national street name plate suppliers, to local SME's. We assisted these with the SNP frame design and they manufactured (welded). We also assisted them in obtaining PC systems and cutters for cutting out vinyl etc as well as using polycarbonate and gavernised steel backing plates. This formed the main construction of the SNP's. We contracted with these SME's for two services, namely SNP's and pedestrian guard rail repair and replacement (we designed the basoics and they manufactured as required) which again was cheaper and more effective than buying in from national supliers. The service, being local, was also response orientated for our 'customers' and so had fast and 'urgent' response levels contracted in. The service worked well. We also in fact trained the chaps to use Cat's, Gennys were not deemed necessary, and insisted that the contractor 'splashed out' and got their own. As far as I can recall, they never encountered a utility cable in anger whilst taking down or erecting any SNP's, but we did see a trend that large signs generally (due to their positioning) had a higher level of service cables being encountered. Often because they were illuminated of course!! I would say that nowadays, as a minimum, the persons must be competent Cat users. I would suggest that pre-planning of works in ultra-urban areas, including obtaining location drawings from the statutory undertakers prior to undertaking works would assist greatly 'if' anything were to occur, and of course help prevent it in the first place. One must also remember that a line on a drawing supplied, when scale is considered, is often 2m wide or more, so carefull hand excavation, as always, should be the order of the day.... which is of course the way most such jobs are performed, and perhaps hence the low incident/accident rate.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.