Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 02 June 2003 17:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson No its not! I sometimes really despair with us H&S lot, we do the job to the best of our ability, the majority of the time with no or little thanks. "So lets get a degree then!" I fancy 'outer mongolian flute playing' and I can then do a Phd in 'jellies and other wobbly foods'. OK done that, now fancy this H&S lark its a doddle, done a two week course and I'm now an expert! After all Phd,BSc(hons),AIIRSM, Couls advance my career, might as well do a NEBOSH Cert now! Who will pay me money to advise them? This employer is looking for someone at £20k H&S Manager right up my street we say. I say what a load of Hugh, Pugh, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble & Grub!!!!! Chartered status cannot arrive a minute sooner for me, at least we will know who is professional and who are 'playing' at it! or is someone really winding me up??? or what! Would you give this person work if your neck was on the line?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 02 June 2003 17:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Whent Dave et al. Although I think you may have swallowed an angry wasp, I fully agree with the sentiment. It seems incredible to me that no experience and no qualifications is not seen as a barrier to representing the safety interests of many workers. Assistants and advisors should be part of a team and are invaluable. But part of the team not leading it..I had a boss at one company who paraded himself as 'Head of SQE' with a Managing Safely Certificate! Rob
Admin  
#3 Posted : 02 June 2003 17:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Geoff Burt I don't suppose I should respond to this Dave but let me ask you a question. Why would being chartered (and I assume you mean individually chartered) be any different from MIOSH or FIOSH recognition in the case you mention? This is a genuine question that I don't know the answer to. Geoff
Admin  
#4 Posted : 02 June 2003 17:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Diane Thomason Dave, You've made your wobbly jelly PhD point at least twice before, so I can see this is something that really concerns you. But is it really true that someone can get MIOSH status with a degree/PhD in some irrelevant non-safety subject plus a NEBOSH Certificate, which seems to be what you are angry about? Looking at the membership requirements it seems clear to me that the only degrees, diplomas etc. recognised for MIOSH are health and safety ones. One of us has completely misunderstood! Is anyone from IOSH (Norman Walton??) willing to clear this one up? For the time being Dave, go home and have a nice beer and calm down!! Kind regards Diane
Admin  
#5 Posted : 03 June 2003 01:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer Dave By way of an explanation from outside of UK: In Australia a few years ago the advertisements for a safety person were low key affair, eg a two weeks course done by the National Safety Council was the norm in respect to OHS qualifications. Universities began offering courses in OHS and Hygiene and as people gained these qualifications industry became aware of the changes to the standards of education for the safety professional and the advertisement now normally require some form of Tertiary qualification. Certainly at management or consultant level need BSc or MSc standards. I guess what I am saying is that eventually in UK the market place will determine those it wants in these roles and they will set the standards that the safety person will need to meet. Employment in Aus in a role of safety coordinator requires a Grad Cert or Dip in OHS as minimum. This is so in NZ, Canada and working in the Middle East or Far East. I recently audited a Shipyard in Singapore (3,000 employees), where the client safety manager, the local representative co-auditor and myself all held tertiary qualifications in OHS. 5 years previously I would have been the only one with any qualifications in OHS. Times are a changing, and once people realise this is the future, then attitudes will change. I understand your frustration and I sympathise - however change is inevitability. Part of this is the incorporation of the IOHS. I hope this helps.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 03 June 2003 08:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Dave and the others, I’ve quite enjoyed reading the various spleen “ventings”, but come on lads (notice how it is the males?) there are now five threads all waffling about the same stuff and I’m growing bored. I would agree that employers need educating regarding the level of competence required, so for the time being lets concentrate on promoting MIOSH as a high standard of attainment. Can I suggest the three or four “usual suspects” channel their energies into helping other forum threads (they keep pushing down the list) that could benefit from your undoubted expertise. Other than that, run for election for council, or is that too much like hard work?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 03 June 2003 09:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Hazel Harvey In particular response to Diane. As well as the well publicised accredited qualifications in OSH, there is a route to membership for mature graduates with degrees relevant to OSH, who can demonstrate at least three years experience in OSH matters. This group of Members are frequently called topic specialists, although in fact they are corporate members in the same way as any other. I am sure it is this group to which Dave refers and it would be undoubtedly true that in the past there have been some members admitted who would no longer meet the current qualification profile. However, many of these members have attained the relevant knowledge and experience and have in due course moved on to the Register of Safety Practitioners, so it is not for anyone to say that they are not competent because of their initial qualifications. This apart, before we get a flood of applicants with no knowledge of OSH, the Admissions Committee now police this route of entry with extreme rigour and in all but exceptional cases, applicants to the grade of MIOSH without accredited qualifications are interviewed to determine if they should be offered the grade. It is also worth pointing out that only very relevant degrees like Occupational Hygiene or some Safety Engineering degrees which are very high level but do not meet all of the broad requirements for IOSH accreditation are considered. PhD's in wobbly jelly are definately not! Just a word on MIOSH. This is in fact not a grade which recognises full comptence in practice, it is only the Register of Safety Practitioners that really does this. Here, following initial assessment by the Admissions Committee, competence is maintained by Continuing Professional Development which is monitored by peers from the profession. One of the confusions that has developed over the years since the introduction of the current membership structure is this differentation between the Register and the corporate grade The corporate grade encompasses those with relevant qualifications to broaden the base of knowledge, to fulfil our learned society role. It is these types of issues which the Council of Management will be discussing at their forthcoming meeting as well as the already aired TechSP debate. Hazel Harvey Head of Professional Affairs
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.