Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 July 2003 15:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eddie Newall I work for a university college and often teach on customers' premises at their request, usually NHS premises, as do many of my colleagues. Is my employer responsible for visiting these premises to conduct risk assessments to ensure my health and safety? Also, many of our students (about 15,000) are sponsored by their employer and college premises in effect become their workplace. Are their employers responsible for visiting college premises to conduct risk assessments for their employees? Some students travel hundreds of miles to attend the college, and many travel from abroad. This is what has been suggested to me should be happening, but this doesn't seem practical and the expense would be enormous.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 July 2003 15:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Eddie, Whoever suggested this is raving mad, the occupier of premises is responsible for what goes on there and to take into account the likely hazards and risks towhich these people are exposed. H ethen has ro ensure that reasonable precaustions are put in place to prevent harm or damahge to the said users. Maybe a person from an LEA could spread a bit more light on this.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 July 2003 15:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Donaldson Eddie, CVCP [now Universities UK (UUK)] and the Universities and Collages Employers Association (UCEA) working with the Universities Safety and Health Association (USHA) and others published guidance covering a number of the matters you refer to. The guidance is titled “Health and Safety Guidance for the Placement of HE Students” and is a priced publication from UCEA. There are some parts of the guidance which need updating and a working group is looking at revising the guidance. Details of this and other publications can be found on the USHA web pages www.usha.org.uk John
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 July 2003 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eddie Newall Thanks to Dave & John for your replies, but John, "Health and Safety Guidance for the Placement of HE Students", are we at cross-purposes? Is my physical presence to teach on customers' premises, or the employees of our customers attending our premises for tuition, classed as 'placement'? To me a placement is something else and usually refers to students being placed on premises outside the college as part of their course.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 July 2003 16:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Donaldson Eddie Yes we have got at cross purposes with regards to Students, now that I have re read your posting. However I do have concerns about members of staff who do at times work at other premises. This is a matter my University is addressing with the help of the Academics and Unions. John
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 July 2003 20:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Nagle Eddie. Employers have a responsibility for their employees where they are employed, either on their own premises or in other employers premises. An example of this for instance could be a Building products salesman going onto a construction site. The duty is explicit in that it states 'All employers shall carry out....risks to the health and safety of their employees at work'. Not just those who have employees on their own premises.... The duty is to undertake a suitable and sufficient assessment of risks MHSW Regs (reg 3). I would suggest that it is reasonably practicable to do this in the case of employees going to (visiting or working) other premises to work/teach, as it is for the construction products salesman, as would be information, instruction and training. I would however suggest that it is not reasonable to suggest that an employer undertakes a risk assessment for students (are they in employment of in full/part-time education?) who are hundreds of mailes away, as I think this would be covered sufficiently under other regulations specifically covering the health and safety of persons attending colleges/universities etc. (I stand to be corrected!!) The college or university you attend to teach also has a duty to assess the risks to students/employees/visitors (which you may be one or the other in their eyes), and to advise and inform you of potential risks etc and the control measures etc that you are to comply with....e.g. the college/university safety rules etc...
Admin  
#7 Posted : 15 July 2003 08:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eddie Newall Thanks for your reply Stuart. In relation to university lecturers teaching off-site, the scale of the problem is enormous. In my faculty we have about 2,000 students on nursing, medical imaging and occupational therapy programmes, all with substantial requirements for workplace placements. In our case their placements are dispersed throughout Kent, in hundreds of different locations in NHS premises. Students also make home visits. Ignoring the health & safety aspects of students in placements (my original posting was in relation to university lecturers) lecturers are required to visit these students whilst they are in their placements. We are also required to teach off-site in NHS and other premises. There is also the education faculty with hundreds of student teachers who have to be visited by lecturers during teaching practice. Then three other faculties with varying degrees of workplace visits by lecturers. Some lecturers travel throughout the UK as part of their work, and in some instances outside the UK. A colleague of mine was recently in Australia, and we were warned about the dangers of visiting China and Canada recently due to SARS (although personally, 30 miles from base is about my limit). In relation to risk assessments on premises outside the university where lecturers are required to work, how would what is “reasonably practicable” in these circumstances be determined? Because of the number of premises involved, and their geographical locations, risk assessment of ALL premises would require a large team of full-time risk assessors. I assume that the high cost of this would not be regarded as reasonably practicable, if only on the grounds that it would render provision of these programmes by the university totally uneconomic. Would it be, for example, no risk assessments further than a 50 mile radius of the university, or none after £100,000 has been spent in any one year? Or would other criteria be used? Fortunately I am not personally responsible for what my employer does or doesn’t do in this matter - health & safety isn’t my responsibility in this context.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 15 July 2003 09:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson In the broader sense of things are we really expected to undertake a Risk Assessment of all premises in which we may send some of our employees. Does the LA EHO have to carry out a RA for every type of shop it sends its staff to or the HSE for that matter. Thought that RA was about 'significant' hazards and noting 'significant' risk. Think that we in this profession are taking the RA way to far and are in danger of Risk Assessing everything, everybody and every scenario and as such this valuable tool will be greatly devalued.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 15 July 2003 09:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Boyd Wright I'd make this subject a simple part of student or lecturer training. Train them to be proactive at first visit / induction and request to be told what risks are (by whoever is in control of premises) and the control measures. Typically fire alsrms, evacuation routes and muster points as well as areas they are to work in and equipment they are to work with. Training should tell them what to expect and what a safe system of work / RA looks like. Give them a simple checklist. I'd put the requirement by the occupier to do this briefing in the documentation / contract that each location taking the student will exchange with you. Lecturer on first visit can check it has been done and he/she themselves will be 'safe' if they are accompanied by the occupier /student whilst on site. To visit and do a risk assessment everywhere is simply not practicable from what you say.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 15 July 2003 15:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Diane Thomason Dave Wilson has hit the nail 100% on the head with "Thought that RA was about 'significant' hazards and noting 'significant' risk". Surely the thing to do is think about the significant, foreseeable risks and ensure that these have been addressed?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.