Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 October 2003 14:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Simon Micklewright
Just to cheer you all,

The following is the transcript of an ACTUAL radio conversation in October 1995, between a US Navy ship and The British authorities, near the coast of England.

The transcript was released by the MoD on 10/10/95.

BRITISH: Please divert your course 15 degrees to the South, to avoid collision.

U.S.NAV : Recommend you divert YOUR course 15 degrees to the North, to
avoid a collision.

BRITISH: Negative. You will have to divert your course 15 degrees to the
South to avoid a collision.

U.S.NAVY: This is the Captain of US Navy ship. I say again, YOUR course.

BRITISH: Negative. I say again. You will have to divert your course.

U.S.NAVY: THIS IS THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER USS LINCOLN. THE SECOND LARGEST SHIP IN THE UNITED STATES' ATLANTIC FLEET. WE ARE ACCOMPANIED BY THREE DESTROYERS, THREE CRUISERS AND NUMEROUS SUPPORT VESSELS. I DEMAND THAT YOU CHANGE YOUR COURSE 15 DEGREES NORTH. THAT'S 15 DEGREES NORTH, OR COUNTER MEASURES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THIS SHIP.

BRITISH: We are a lighthouse.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 04 October 2003 12:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch
Simon

Instinctively I thought this was an urban myth and it seems that the Brits were actually Canadians, and the Lincoln was the Enterprise.

See

eg http://www.urbanlegends....ighthouse_tins_more.html

From: cmraman@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Phantom Photographer)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Aircraft carrier/lighthouse legend debunked
Date: 20 Jun 1996 16:37:09 GMT


For the last several months (though I believe it started after September), we have been regaled with the story of an alleged encounter between the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise, and a lighthouse on the Canadian coast. This encounter seemed, in the abstract, to be patently false, but in the absence of any physical evidence, has been considered unproved.

A few days ago, I was lent a copy of "Asimov Laughs Again", a 1992 compilation of jokes, anecdotes, limericks and other humorous things by the late Isaac Asimov. While flipping through and chuckling quietly to myself, I came upon entry #170 (each piece is indexed by number) on page 119. To wit:

The huge ship was barreling through the waters one inky night (in
the days before radar) and you can imagine the captain's indig-
nation when he saw, up ahead, other lights coming closer.

Cholerically, he ordered the message sent ahead, "Veer off!"

The message came back, "You veer off."

The captain, beside himself, had the message sent off, "Veer off,
you blasted idiot. This is a battleship coming toward you."

And almost at once a message came back, "Well, think it over. This
is a lighthouse coming toward you."

Clearly, this is merely a joke that has been arount longer than aircraft carriers, and explains a key omission of the story as we have heard it: Why isn't the Enterprise's radar picking up the land mass behind the lighthouse?

So, Asimov provides the answer, and I propose an entry in the FAQ reading

F*: Aircraft carrier, insisting on right-of-way, challenges lighthouse.

with the asterisked F leading to an explanation along these lines:

This is merely an updating of a funny story, perhaps playing upon the arrogance of naval captains, which dates back to the days of battleships and no radar. For an older example, see joke #170 in "Asimov Laughs Again", by Isaac Asimov. The book, published in 1992 by HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., has the ISBN of 0-06-016826-9 and the Library of Congress Catalog number of 91-58353. The joke is on page 119 of the hardcover edition.

Marc "still bucking for a hat, as it'll help prevent sunburn" Reeve

Simple Google search throws up other sceptics.

Regards, Peter
Admin  
#3 Posted : 04 October 2003 15:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jason Gould
Im Flabagasted at this much detail. Heheheheh
Admin  
#4 Posted : 04 October 2003 21:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Abbott
Well... I thought it was funny Simon :D
Chris
Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 October 2003 04:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Spencer
Well done Simon, we all had a good laugh!!!

The pity of it all is the subliminal message about the American arrogance towards all that is not American.

Anyone who has worked in the oil industry where American executives were in charge will relate to the above statement.

I recall seeing the job statements and particularly where remuneration was discussed. The contract dealt with “Americans and non American”.

The make a difference not us – the rest of the world.

I was recommended to view the video “Bowling for Columbine”. If you really want to understand the American condition, get this movie out and have a gander.

It’s possibly the fact that most Americans own an average of 9 guns per family.

Well being ‘brung up’ with that amount of ‘firepower’ for domestic use, might account for the delusions of grandeur demonstrated by the US Navy Captain, when elevated to the dizzy heights of force element group commander.

Whilst I don’t always agree with the French (and not many do) I think the brand of civilisation espoused by George double uu small shrub is more suited to Wild West than the reality that is the rest of the World.

Vive the rest of the world and lets hope that the reality created by Hollywood does not become our inheritance.








Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.